英格兰接种第一剂和第二剂新冠肺炎疫苗后的不良事件:国家疫苗监测平台自我控制的病例系列研究。

IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-03 DOI:10.1177/01410768231205430
Ruby Sm Tsang, Utkarsh Agrawal, Mark Joy, Rachel Byford, Chris Robertson, Sneha N Anand, William Hinton, Nikhil Mayor, Debasish Kar, John Williams, William Victor, Ashley Akbari, Declan T Bradley, Siobhan Murphy, Dermot O'Reilly, Rhiannon K Owen, Antony Chuter, Jillian Beggs, Gary Howsam, Aziz Sheikh, F D Richard Hobbs, Simon de Lusignan
{"title":"英格兰接种第一剂和第二剂新冠肺炎疫苗后的不良事件:国家疫苗监测平台自我控制的病例系列研究。","authors":"Ruby Sm Tsang, Utkarsh Agrawal, Mark Joy, Rachel Byford, Chris Robertson, Sneha N Anand, William Hinton, Nikhil Mayor, Debasish Kar, John Williams, William Victor, Ashley Akbari, Declan T Bradley, Siobhan Murphy, Dermot O'Reilly, Rhiannon K Owen, Antony Chuter, Jillian Beggs, Gary Howsam, Aziz Sheikh, F D Richard Hobbs, Simon de Lusignan","doi":"10.1177/01410768231205430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To estimate the incidence of adverse events of interest (AEIs) after receiving their first and second doses of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccinations, and to report the safety profile differences between the different COVID-19 vaccines.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We used a self-controlled case series design to estimate the relative incidence (RI) of AEIs reported to the Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners national sentinel network. We compared the AEIs that occurred seven days before and after receiving the COVID-19 vaccinations to background levels between 1 October 2020 and 12 September 2021.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>England, UK.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Individuals experiencing AEIs after receiving first and second doses of COVID-19 vaccines.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>AEIs determined based on events reported in clinical trials and in primary care during post-license surveillance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7,952,861 individuals were vaccinated with COVID-19 vaccines within the study period. Among them, 781,200 individuals (9.82%) presented to general practice with 1,482,273 AEIs. Within the first seven days post-vaccination, 4.85% of all the AEIs were reported. There was a 3-7% decrease in the overall RI of AEIs in the seven days after receiving both doses of Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 (RI = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.91-0.94) and 0.96; 95% CI: 0.94-0.98), respectively) and Oxford-AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 (RI = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95-0.98) for both doses), but a 20% increase after receiving the first dose of Moderna mRNA-1273 (RI = 1.20; 95% CI: 1.00-1.44)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a small decrease in the incidence of medically attended AEIs. Sentinel networks could routinely report common AEI rates, which could contribute to reporting vaccine safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":17271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"134-148"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11100448/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse events after first and second doses of COVID-19 vaccination in England: a national vaccine surveillance platform self-controlled case series study.\",\"authors\":\"Ruby Sm Tsang, Utkarsh Agrawal, Mark Joy, Rachel Byford, Chris Robertson, Sneha N Anand, William Hinton, Nikhil Mayor, Debasish Kar, John Williams, William Victor, Ashley Akbari, Declan T Bradley, Siobhan Murphy, Dermot O'Reilly, Rhiannon K Owen, Antony Chuter, Jillian Beggs, Gary Howsam, Aziz Sheikh, F D Richard Hobbs, Simon de Lusignan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01410768231205430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To estimate the incidence of adverse events of interest (AEIs) after receiving their first and second doses of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccinations, and to report the safety profile differences between the different COVID-19 vaccines.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We used a self-controlled case series design to estimate the relative incidence (RI) of AEIs reported to the Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners national sentinel network. We compared the AEIs that occurred seven days before and after receiving the COVID-19 vaccinations to background levels between 1 October 2020 and 12 September 2021.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>England, UK.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Individuals experiencing AEIs after receiving first and second doses of COVID-19 vaccines.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>AEIs determined based on events reported in clinical trials and in primary care during post-license surveillance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7,952,861 individuals were vaccinated with COVID-19 vaccines within the study period. Among them, 781,200 individuals (9.82%) presented to general practice with 1,482,273 AEIs. Within the first seven days post-vaccination, 4.85% of all the AEIs were reported. There was a 3-7% decrease in the overall RI of AEIs in the seven days after receiving both doses of Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 (RI = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.91-0.94) and 0.96; 95% CI: 0.94-0.98), respectively) and Oxford-AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 (RI = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95-0.98) for both doses), but a 20% increase after receiving the first dose of Moderna mRNA-1273 (RI = 1.20; 95% CI: 1.00-1.44)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a small decrease in the incidence of medically attended AEIs. Sentinel networks could routinely report common AEI rates, which could contribute to reporting vaccine safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"134-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11100448/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01410768231205430\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01410768231205430","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:估计接种第一剂和第二剂2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)疫苗后感兴趣不良事件(AEI)的发生率,并报告不同新冠肺炎疫苗之间的安全性差异。设计:我们使用自我控制的病例系列设计来估计向牛津皇家全科医生学院国家哨点网络报告的不良事件的相对发生率(RI)。我们将接种新冠肺炎疫苗前后7天发生的不良事件与2020年10月1日至2021年9月12日期间的背景水平进行了比较。背景:英国英格兰。参与者:接种第一剂和第二剂新冠肺炎疫苗后出现不良事件的个人。主要结果指标:根据临床试验和许可证后监测期间初级保健中报告的事件确定AE。结果:在研究期间,共有7952861人接种了新冠肺炎疫苗。其中,781200人(9.82%)接受了全科治疗,共有1482273例不良事件。在接种疫苗后的前7天内,报告了4.85%的不良事件。在接受两剂辉瑞-BioNTech BNT162b2后的七天内,AE的总体RI下降了3-7%(RI = 0.93;95%CI:0.91-0.94)和0.96;95%可信区间:0.94-0.98)和牛津-阿斯利康ChAdOx1(RI = 0.97;95%置信区间:0.95-0.98),但在接受第一剂莫德纳mRNA-1273后增加了20%(RI = 1.20;95%CI:1.00-1.44)。结论:新冠肺炎疫苗与医疗护理不良事件发生率的小幅下降有关。哨兵网络可以定期报告常见的不良事件发生率,这有助于报告疫苗安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adverse events after first and second doses of COVID-19 vaccination in England: a national vaccine surveillance platform self-controlled case series study.

Objectives: To estimate the incidence of adverse events of interest (AEIs) after receiving their first and second doses of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccinations, and to report the safety profile differences between the different COVID-19 vaccines.

Design: We used a self-controlled case series design to estimate the relative incidence (RI) of AEIs reported to the Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners national sentinel network. We compared the AEIs that occurred seven days before and after receiving the COVID-19 vaccinations to background levels between 1 October 2020 and 12 September 2021.

Setting: England, UK.

Participants: Individuals experiencing AEIs after receiving first and second doses of COVID-19 vaccines.

Main outcome measures: AEIs determined based on events reported in clinical trials and in primary care during post-license surveillance.

Results: A total of 7,952,861 individuals were vaccinated with COVID-19 vaccines within the study period. Among them, 781,200 individuals (9.82%) presented to general practice with 1,482,273 AEIs. Within the first seven days post-vaccination, 4.85% of all the AEIs were reported. There was a 3-7% decrease in the overall RI of AEIs in the seven days after receiving both doses of Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 (RI = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.91-0.94) and 0.96; 95% CI: 0.94-0.98), respectively) and Oxford-AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 (RI = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95-0.98) for both doses), but a 20% increase after receiving the first dose of Moderna mRNA-1273 (RI = 1.20; 95% CI: 1.00-1.44)).

Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a small decrease in the incidence of medically attended AEIs. Sentinel networks could routinely report common AEI rates, which could contribute to reporting vaccine safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
3.50%
发文量
107
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since 1809, the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (JRSM) has been a trusted source of information in the medical field. Our publication covers a wide range of topics, including evidence-based reviews, original research papers, commentaries, and personal perspectives. As an independent scientific and educational journal, we strive to foster constructive discussions on vital clinical matters. While we are based in the UK, our articles address issues that are globally relevant and of interest to healthcare professionals worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信