非对比计算机断层扫描对缺血核心的自动评估:一项与CT灌注的多中心比较分析。

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Puja Shahrouki, Shingo Kihira, Elham Tavakkol, Joe X Qiao, Achala Vagal, Pooja Khatri, Mersedeh Bahr-Hosseini, Geoffrey P Colby, Reza Jahan, Gary Duckwiler, Viktor Szeder, Luke Ledbetter, Stephen Cai, Banafsheh Salehi, Amish H Doshi, Puneet Belani, Johanna T Fifi, Reade De Leacy, J Mocco, Jeffrey L Saver, David S Liebeskind, Kambiz Nael
{"title":"非对比计算机断层扫描对缺血核心的自动评估:一项与CT灌注的多中心比较分析。","authors":"Puja Shahrouki, Shingo Kihira, Elham Tavakkol, Joe X Qiao, Achala Vagal, Pooja Khatri, Mersedeh Bahr-Hosseini, Geoffrey P Colby, Reza Jahan, Gary Duckwiler, Viktor Szeder, Luke Ledbetter, Stephen Cai, Banafsheh Salehi, Amish H Doshi, Puneet Belani, Johanna T Fifi, Reade De Leacy, J Mocco, Jeffrey L Saver, David S Liebeskind, Kambiz Nael","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2023-020954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Application of machine learning (ML) algorithms has shown promising results in estimating ischemic core volumes using non-contrast CT (NCCT).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the performance of the e-Stroke Suite software (Brainomix) in assessing ischemic core volumes on NCCT compared with CT perfusion (CTP) in patients with acute ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective multicenter study, patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusions who underwent pretreatment NCCT and CTP, successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerbral Infarction ≥2b), and post-treatment MRI, were included from three stroke centers. Automated calculation of ischemic core volumes was obtained on NCCT scans using ML algorithm deployed by e-Stroke Suite and from CTP using Olea software (Olea Medical). Comparative analysis was performed between estimated core volumes on NCCT and CTP and against MRI calculated final infarct volume (FIV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111 patients were included. Estimated ischemic core volumes (mean±SD, mL) were 20.4±19.0 on NCCT and 19.9±18.6 on CTP, not significantly different (P=0.82). There was moderate (r=0.40) and significant (P<0.001) correlation between estimated core on NCCT and CTP. The mean difference between FIV and estimated core volume on NCCT and CTP was 29.9±34.6 mL and 29.6±35.0 mL, respectively (P=0.94). Correlations between FIV and estimated core volume were similar for NCCT (r=0.30, P=0.001) and CTP (r=0.36, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results show that ML-based estimated ischemic core volumes on NCCT are comparable to those obtained from concurrent CTP in magnitude and in degree of correlation with MR-assessed FIV.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1288-1293"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated assessment of ischemic core on non-contrast computed tomography: a multicenter comparative analysis with CT perfusion.\",\"authors\":\"Puja Shahrouki, Shingo Kihira, Elham Tavakkol, Joe X Qiao, Achala Vagal, Pooja Khatri, Mersedeh Bahr-Hosseini, Geoffrey P Colby, Reza Jahan, Gary Duckwiler, Viktor Szeder, Luke Ledbetter, Stephen Cai, Banafsheh Salehi, Amish H Doshi, Puneet Belani, Johanna T Fifi, Reade De Leacy, J Mocco, Jeffrey L Saver, David S Liebeskind, Kambiz Nael\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jnis-2023-020954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Application of machine learning (ML) algorithms has shown promising results in estimating ischemic core volumes using non-contrast CT (NCCT).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the performance of the e-Stroke Suite software (Brainomix) in assessing ischemic core volumes on NCCT compared with CT perfusion (CTP) in patients with acute ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective multicenter study, patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusions who underwent pretreatment NCCT and CTP, successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerbral Infarction ≥2b), and post-treatment MRI, were included from three stroke centers. Automated calculation of ischemic core volumes was obtained on NCCT scans using ML algorithm deployed by e-Stroke Suite and from CTP using Olea software (Olea Medical). Comparative analysis was performed between estimated core volumes on NCCT and CTP and against MRI calculated final infarct volume (FIV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111 patients were included. Estimated ischemic core volumes (mean±SD, mL) were 20.4±19.0 on NCCT and 19.9±18.6 on CTP, not significantly different (P=0.82). There was moderate (r=0.40) and significant (P<0.001) correlation between estimated core on NCCT and CTP. The mean difference between FIV and estimated core volume on NCCT and CTP was 29.9±34.6 mL and 29.6±35.0 mL, respectively (P=0.94). Correlations between FIV and estimated core volume were similar for NCCT (r=0.30, P=0.001) and CTP (r=0.36, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results show that ML-based estimated ischemic core volumes on NCCT are comparable to those obtained from concurrent CTP in magnitude and in degree of correlation with MR-assessed FIV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1288-1293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2023-020954\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2023-020954","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:机器学习(ML)算法在使用非对比CT(NCCT)估计缺血性核心体积方面的应用显示出了有希望的结果。目的:评估e-Stroke Suite软件(Brainomix)在评估急性缺血性卒中患者在NCCT和CT灌注(CTP)上的缺血性核心体积时的性能。方法:在这项回顾性多中心研究中,来自三个卒中中心的前循环大血管闭塞患者接受了预处理NCCT和CTP、成功再灌注(改良型脑梗死溶栓≥2b)和治疗后MRI。使用e-Stroke Suite部署的ML算法在NCCT扫描上获得缺血核心体积的自动计算,并使用Olea软件(Olea Medical)从CTP获得。对NCCT和CTP上估计的核心体积与MRI计算的最终梗死体积(FIV)进行比较分析。结果:共有111名患者被纳入。估计的缺血核心体积(平均值±SD,mL)在NCCT上为20.4±19.0,在CTP上为19.9±18.6,没有显著差异(P=0.82)。有中度(r=0.40)和显著性(P结论:结果表明,基于mL的估计的NCCT缺血核心体积在量值和与MR评估的FIV的相关性程度上与同时进行CTP获得的缺血核心容量相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automated assessment of ischemic core on non-contrast computed tomography: a multicenter comparative analysis with CT perfusion.

Background: Application of machine learning (ML) algorithms has shown promising results in estimating ischemic core volumes using non-contrast CT (NCCT).

Objective: To assess the performance of the e-Stroke Suite software (Brainomix) in assessing ischemic core volumes on NCCT compared with CT perfusion (CTP) in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Methods: In this retrospective multicenter study, patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusions who underwent pretreatment NCCT and CTP, successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerbral Infarction ≥2b), and post-treatment MRI, were included from three stroke centers. Automated calculation of ischemic core volumes was obtained on NCCT scans using ML algorithm deployed by e-Stroke Suite and from CTP using Olea software (Olea Medical). Comparative analysis was performed between estimated core volumes on NCCT and CTP and against MRI calculated final infarct volume (FIV).

Results: A total of 111 patients were included. Estimated ischemic core volumes (mean±SD, mL) were 20.4±19.0 on NCCT and 19.9±18.6 on CTP, not significantly different (P=0.82). There was moderate (r=0.40) and significant (P<0.001) correlation between estimated core on NCCT and CTP. The mean difference between FIV and estimated core volume on NCCT and CTP was 29.9±34.6 mL and 29.6±35.0 mL, respectively (P=0.94). Correlations between FIV and estimated core volume were similar for NCCT (r=0.30, P=0.001) and CTP (r=0.36, P<0.001).

Conclusions: Results show that ML-based estimated ischemic core volumes on NCCT are comparable to those obtained from concurrent CTP in magnitude and in degree of correlation with MR-assessed FIV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信