{"title":"过敏性真菌性呼吸道疾病的过敏性免疫疗法。","authors":"Harold S Nelson","doi":"10.2500/aap.2023.44.230058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Allergy immunotherapy (AIT) with fungal extracts is not as straight forward as that with other inhalants. The complexities relate to the number of airborne fungal spores, the limited data on the exposure to the spores of individual species of fungi and their clinical importance, the poor quality of the fungal allergen extracts that are available for the diagnosis and treatment, and the lack of controlled studies establishing dosing and efficacy of AIT with fungal extracts except for Alternaria. <b>Objective:</b> The objective was to review what is known with regard to the role of fungi in causing allergic respiratory diseases as well as the evidence that exists for the role of AIT as a treatment for these conditions. <b>Methods:</b> A search was conducted of PubMed, textbooks, known articles on immunotherapy with fungal extracts, and references derived from these primary sources. <b>Results:</b> Nine immunotherapy studies that used Alternaria or its major allergen Alt a 1 and two studies that used Cladosporium herbarum were identified. When a good quality extract was administered in adequate doses, immunotherapy with Alternaria was as effective as that with other inhalant allergens. There was a suggestion of efficacy with a specially prepared Cladosporium extract, but systemic reactions were common and limited the tolerated dose. The use of immunotherapy as an adjunct treatment for allergic fungal sinusitis is briefly reviewed, but controlled trials are lacking. <b>Conclusion:</b> Fungal immunotherapy should largely be limited to Alternaria alternata and perhaps C. herbarum. Under conditions of demonstrated exposure to a particular species of fungus and with symptoms that correlate with that exposure as well as availability of an apparently potent extract of that fungus to which the patient is sensitive that fungus may be considered for immunotherapy. Fungal (mold) mixes should not be used for diagnosis or therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7646,"journal":{"name":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","volume":"44 6","pages":"395-401"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allergy immunotherapy for allergic fungal respiratory diseases.\",\"authors\":\"Harold S Nelson\",\"doi\":\"10.2500/aap.2023.44.230058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Allergy immunotherapy (AIT) with fungal extracts is not as straight forward as that with other inhalants. The complexities relate to the number of airborne fungal spores, the limited data on the exposure to the spores of individual species of fungi and their clinical importance, the poor quality of the fungal allergen extracts that are available for the diagnosis and treatment, and the lack of controlled studies establishing dosing and efficacy of AIT with fungal extracts except for Alternaria. <b>Objective:</b> The objective was to review what is known with regard to the role of fungi in causing allergic respiratory diseases as well as the evidence that exists for the role of AIT as a treatment for these conditions. <b>Methods:</b> A search was conducted of PubMed, textbooks, known articles on immunotherapy with fungal extracts, and references derived from these primary sources. <b>Results:</b> Nine immunotherapy studies that used Alternaria or its major allergen Alt a 1 and two studies that used Cladosporium herbarum were identified. When a good quality extract was administered in adequate doses, immunotherapy with Alternaria was as effective as that with other inhalant allergens. There was a suggestion of efficacy with a specially prepared Cladosporium extract, but systemic reactions were common and limited the tolerated dose. The use of immunotherapy as an adjunct treatment for allergic fungal sinusitis is briefly reviewed, but controlled trials are lacking. <b>Conclusion:</b> Fungal immunotherapy should largely be limited to Alternaria alternata and perhaps C. herbarum. Under conditions of demonstrated exposure to a particular species of fungus and with symptoms that correlate with that exposure as well as availability of an apparently potent extract of that fungus to which the patient is sensitive that fungus may be considered for immunotherapy. Fungal (mold) mixes should not be used for diagnosis or therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Allergy and asthma proceedings\",\"volume\":\"44 6\",\"pages\":\"395-401\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Allergy and asthma proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2023.44.230058\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2023.44.230058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:真菌提取物的过敏性免疫疗法(AIT)并不像其他吸入剂那样直接。复杂性与空气中真菌孢子的数量有关,关于暴露于单个真菌种类孢子及其临床重要性的数据有限,可用于诊断和治疗的真菌过敏原提取物质量差,以及缺乏确定AIT与除链格孢外的真菌提取物的剂量和疗效的对照研究。目的:目的是回顾真菌在引起过敏性呼吸道疾病中的作用,以及AIT作为治疗这些疾病的作用的证据。方法:检索PubMed、教科书、关于真菌提取物免疫疗法的已知文章以及从这些主要来源获得的参考文献。结果:确定了9项使用链格孢菌或其主要过敏原Alt a 1的免疫疗法研究和2项使用中药枝孢菌的研究。当给予足够剂量的优质提取物时,链格孢菌的免疫疗法与其他吸入性过敏原的免疫疗法一样有效。有人建议使用专门制备的枝孢提取物有疗效,但全身反应很常见,并限制了耐受剂量。简要回顾了免疫疗法作为过敏性真菌性鼻窦炎辅助治疗的应用,但缺乏对照试验。结论:真菌免疫治疗应主要局限于链格孢和中药。在证明暴露于特定种类真菌的条件下,有与该暴露相关的症状,以及患者对该真菌敏感的明显有效提取物的可用性,可以考虑对该真菌进行免疫治疗。真菌(霉菌)混合物不应用于诊断或治疗。
Allergy immunotherapy for allergic fungal respiratory diseases.
Background: Allergy immunotherapy (AIT) with fungal extracts is not as straight forward as that with other inhalants. The complexities relate to the number of airborne fungal spores, the limited data on the exposure to the spores of individual species of fungi and their clinical importance, the poor quality of the fungal allergen extracts that are available for the diagnosis and treatment, and the lack of controlled studies establishing dosing and efficacy of AIT with fungal extracts except for Alternaria. Objective: The objective was to review what is known with regard to the role of fungi in causing allergic respiratory diseases as well as the evidence that exists for the role of AIT as a treatment for these conditions. Methods: A search was conducted of PubMed, textbooks, known articles on immunotherapy with fungal extracts, and references derived from these primary sources. Results: Nine immunotherapy studies that used Alternaria or its major allergen Alt a 1 and two studies that used Cladosporium herbarum were identified. When a good quality extract was administered in adequate doses, immunotherapy with Alternaria was as effective as that with other inhalant allergens. There was a suggestion of efficacy with a specially prepared Cladosporium extract, but systemic reactions were common and limited the tolerated dose. The use of immunotherapy as an adjunct treatment for allergic fungal sinusitis is briefly reviewed, but controlled trials are lacking. Conclusion: Fungal immunotherapy should largely be limited to Alternaria alternata and perhaps C. herbarum. Under conditions of demonstrated exposure to a particular species of fungus and with symptoms that correlate with that exposure as well as availability of an apparently potent extract of that fungus to which the patient is sensitive that fungus may be considered for immunotherapy. Fungal (mold) mixes should not be used for diagnosis or therapy.
期刊介绍:
Allergy & Asthma Proceedings is a peer reviewed publication dedicated to distributing timely scientific research regarding advancements in the knowledge and practice of allergy, asthma and immunology. Its primary readership consists of allergists and pulmonologists. The goal of the Proceedings is to publish articles with a predominantly clinical focus which directly impact quality of care for patients with allergic disease and asthma. Featured topics include asthma, rhinitis, sinusitis, food allergies, allergic skin diseases, diagnostic techniques, allergens, and treatment modalities. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials and review articles.