Wei Hong, Jon R. Star, Ru-De Liu, Ronghuan Jiang, Xinchen Fu
{"title":"数学灵活性的系统回顾:概念、测量和相关研究","authors":"Wei Hong, Jon R. Star, Ru-De Liu, Ronghuan Jiang, Xinchen Fu","doi":"10.1007/s10648-023-09825-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mathematical flexibility has been widely acknowledged as an important learning goal in mathematical education and has received increasing research attention in order to explore its nature, facilitating mechanisms, and promotion interventions. Given that researchers conceptualize, assess, and explain flexibility in mathematical problem solving from different perspectives, a systematic review could contribute to an integrated framework of mathematical flexibility. To this end, we review mathematical flexibility in terms of its concepts, measurements, and related research on influencing factors and effective interventions. Additionally, we propose a three-dimensional model focusing on analytic units, manifestation forms, and evaluation criteria, which we argue advances a comprehensive understanding of mathematical flexibility. Overall, this review not only helps to reveal the multifaceted construct of mathematical flexibility in theory but also provides supporting evidence for targeted educational interventions in teaching practice. In addition, we discuss each aspect of mathematical flexibility and propose future research directions to potentially broaden and deepen mathematical flexibility research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of Mathematical Flexibility: Concepts, Measurements, and Related Research\",\"authors\":\"Wei Hong, Jon R. Star, Ru-De Liu, Ronghuan Jiang, Xinchen Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10648-023-09825-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Mathematical flexibility has been widely acknowledged as an important learning goal in mathematical education and has received increasing research attention in order to explore its nature, facilitating mechanisms, and promotion interventions. Given that researchers conceptualize, assess, and explain flexibility in mathematical problem solving from different perspectives, a systematic review could contribute to an integrated framework of mathematical flexibility. To this end, we review mathematical flexibility in terms of its concepts, measurements, and related research on influencing factors and effective interventions. Additionally, we propose a three-dimensional model focusing on analytic units, manifestation forms, and evaluation criteria, which we argue advances a comprehensive understanding of mathematical flexibility. Overall, this review not only helps to reveal the multifaceted construct of mathematical flexibility in theory but also provides supporting evidence for targeted educational interventions in teaching practice. In addition, we discuss each aspect of mathematical flexibility and propose future research directions to potentially broaden and deepen mathematical flexibility research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09825-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09825-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Systematic Review of Mathematical Flexibility: Concepts, Measurements, and Related Research
Mathematical flexibility has been widely acknowledged as an important learning goal in mathematical education and has received increasing research attention in order to explore its nature, facilitating mechanisms, and promotion interventions. Given that researchers conceptualize, assess, and explain flexibility in mathematical problem solving from different perspectives, a systematic review could contribute to an integrated framework of mathematical flexibility. To this end, we review mathematical flexibility in terms of its concepts, measurements, and related research on influencing factors and effective interventions. Additionally, we propose a three-dimensional model focusing on analytic units, manifestation forms, and evaluation criteria, which we argue advances a comprehensive understanding of mathematical flexibility. Overall, this review not only helps to reveal the multifaceted construct of mathematical flexibility in theory but also provides supporting evidence for targeted educational interventions in teaching practice. In addition, we discuss each aspect of mathematical flexibility and propose future research directions to potentially broaden and deepen mathematical flexibility research.
期刊介绍:
Educational Psychology Review aims to disseminate knowledge and promote dialogue within the field of educational psychology. It serves as a platform for the publication of various types of articles, including peer-reviewed integrative reviews, special thematic issues, reflections on previous research or new research directions, interviews, and research-based advice for practitioners. The journal caters to a diverse readership, ranging from generalists in educational psychology to experts in specific areas of the discipline. The content offers a comprehensive coverage of topics and provides in-depth information to meet the needs of both specialized researchers and practitioners.