可持续发展:可持续发展委员会在实现环境、社会和治理目标方面的作用

IF 12.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Aso Abdullah, Sibel Yamak, Anna Korzhenitskaya, Roya Rahimi, Jeanette McClellan
{"title":"可持续发展:可持续发展委员会在实现环境、社会和治理目标方面的作用","authors":"Aso Abdullah,&nbsp;Sibel Yamak,&nbsp;Anna Korzhenitskaya,&nbsp;Roya Rahimi,&nbsp;Jeanette McClellan","doi":"10.1002/bse.3596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigating the impact of sustainability committee characteristics (SCCs) on corporate sustainability performance (CSP) utilised environmental, social and governance (ESG) scoring. Based on secondary data obtained from Refinitiv, Fame and FTSE 150 databases, the sample consists of 112 non-financial companies from 2010 to 2018, thus 926 firm-year observations. The results reveal a positive and significant relationship between organisational factors including firm size, profitability and firm age across combined ESG and environmental scores. As for the sustainability committee characteristics, there is a positive association between frequency of committee meeting and age diversity with governance scores and a negative relationship between frequency of committee meeting and environmental performance. The empirical finding shows positive and negative relationships under the presence of focussed and non-focussed committees equally. Furthermore, the presence of focussed or non-focussed sustainability committees (SCs) do appear to have an association with the overall CSP. Furthermore, this paper provides empirical evidence of the insignificant relationship of SCC with the sub-dimension of social performance, which contradicts our hypothesis and existing studies. Together with SCC's weak associations with environment and governance dimensions, this finding supports the argument that firms are actively using sustainability committees to create positive public image and reputation to protect legitimacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"33 3","pages":"2250-2268"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bse.3596","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainable development: The role of sustainability committees in achieving ESG targets\",\"authors\":\"Aso Abdullah,&nbsp;Sibel Yamak,&nbsp;Anna Korzhenitskaya,&nbsp;Roya Rahimi,&nbsp;Jeanette McClellan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bse.3596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study investigating the impact of sustainability committee characteristics (SCCs) on corporate sustainability performance (CSP) utilised environmental, social and governance (ESG) scoring. Based on secondary data obtained from Refinitiv, Fame and FTSE 150 databases, the sample consists of 112 non-financial companies from 2010 to 2018, thus 926 firm-year observations. The results reveal a positive and significant relationship between organisational factors including firm size, profitability and firm age across combined ESG and environmental scores. As for the sustainability committee characteristics, there is a positive association between frequency of committee meeting and age diversity with governance scores and a negative relationship between frequency of committee meeting and environmental performance. The empirical finding shows positive and negative relationships under the presence of focussed and non-focussed committees equally. Furthermore, the presence of focussed or non-focussed sustainability committees (SCs) do appear to have an association with the overall CSP. Furthermore, this paper provides empirical evidence of the insignificant relationship of SCC with the sub-dimension of social performance, which contradicts our hypothesis and existing studies. Together with SCC's weak associations with environment and governance dimensions, this finding supports the argument that firms are actively using sustainability committees to create positive public image and reputation to protect legitimacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Strategy and The Environment\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"2250-2268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bse.3596\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Strategy and The Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bse.3596\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bse.3596","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用环境、社会和治理(ESG)评分法调查可持续发展委员会特征(SCC)对企业可持续发展绩效(CSP)的影响。基于从 Refinitiv、Fame 和 FTSE 150 数据库中获得的二手数据,样本包括 2010 年至 2018 年的 112 家非金融企业,即 926 个企业年观测值。结果显示,在ESG和环境综合评分中,企业规模、盈利能力和企业年龄等组织因素之间存在显著的正相关关系。至于可持续发展委员会的特征,委员会会议频率和年龄多样性与治理得分之间存在正相关,而委员会会议频率与环境绩效之间存在负相关。实证研究结果表明,在存在重点委员会和非重点委员会的情况下,两者同样存在正负关系。此外,重点或非重点可持续发展委员会(SC)的存在似乎与整体 CSP 有关联。此外,本文还提供了实证证据,证明可持续发展委员会与社会绩效子维度的关系并不显著,这与我们的假设和现有研究相矛盾。加上可持续发展委员会与环境和治理维度的微弱关联,这一发现支持了企业积极利用可持续发展委员会创造积极的公众形象和声誉以保护合法性的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sustainable development: The role of sustainability committees in achieving ESG targets

Sustainable development: The role of sustainability committees in achieving ESG targets

This study investigating the impact of sustainability committee characteristics (SCCs) on corporate sustainability performance (CSP) utilised environmental, social and governance (ESG) scoring. Based on secondary data obtained from Refinitiv, Fame and FTSE 150 databases, the sample consists of 112 non-financial companies from 2010 to 2018, thus 926 firm-year observations. The results reveal a positive and significant relationship between organisational factors including firm size, profitability and firm age across combined ESG and environmental scores. As for the sustainability committee characteristics, there is a positive association between frequency of committee meeting and age diversity with governance scores and a negative relationship between frequency of committee meeting and environmental performance. The empirical finding shows positive and negative relationships under the presence of focussed and non-focussed committees equally. Furthermore, the presence of focussed or non-focussed sustainability committees (SCs) do appear to have an association with the overall CSP. Furthermore, this paper provides empirical evidence of the insignificant relationship of SCC with the sub-dimension of social performance, which contradicts our hypothesis and existing studies. Together with SCC's weak associations with environment and governance dimensions, this finding supports the argument that firms are actively using sustainability committees to create positive public image and reputation to protect legitimacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
336
期刊介绍: Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信