双肌肉肌腱的振动不会妨碍目标导向的瞄准任务的执行。

Niyousha Mortaza, Steven R Passmore, Katinka Stecina, Cheryl M Glazebrook
{"title":"双肌肉肌腱的振动不会妨碍目标导向的瞄准任务的执行。","authors":"Niyousha Mortaza,&nbsp;Steven R Passmore,&nbsp;Katinka Stecina,&nbsp;Cheryl M Glazebrook","doi":"10.1080/08990220.2023.2272971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Application of muscle-tendon vibration within the frequency range of 70-120Hz has been studied as a tool to stimulate somatosensory afferents with both the goal of studying human sensorimotor control and of improving post-stroke motor performance. Specific to applications for rehabilitation, current evidence is mixed as to whether dual muscle-tendon vibration is detrimental to the performance of goal-directed upper-limb movements. The current study aimed to determine the effects of muscle-tendon vibration over the wrist flexors and extensors (dual vibration) on performance of a computer goal-directed aiming task.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty healthy participants were assigned to the vibration or control group. An aiming task that involved acquiring targets by moving an unseen cursor on a screen was performed. Vision of the cursor and hand were unavailable throughout the four blocks of movement execution. Only the vibration group received dual vibration throughout four blocks. Task performance was assessed using measures of endpoint accuracy and timing. Perceived hand location was assessed using a set of questions and a computerised conscious perception task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The vibration group had significantly shorter reaction times, without any change in endpoint accuracy, indicating more efficient and effective movement planning. The vibration group did report illusory movement sensation, which was reduced by block 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dual vibration did not adversely affect aiming accuracy and showed some improvement in reaction time. The present findings support the potential for using dual vibration to stimulate the somatosensory system as participants improved their performance of a novel goal-directed movement. Notably, improvements were maintained when the vibration was removed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94211,"journal":{"name":"Somatosensory & motor research","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual muscle tendon vibration does not impede performance of a goal-directed aiming task.\",\"authors\":\"Niyousha Mortaza,&nbsp;Steven R Passmore,&nbsp;Katinka Stecina,&nbsp;Cheryl M Glazebrook\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08990220.2023.2272971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Application of muscle-tendon vibration within the frequency range of 70-120Hz has been studied as a tool to stimulate somatosensory afferents with both the goal of studying human sensorimotor control and of improving post-stroke motor performance. Specific to applications for rehabilitation, current evidence is mixed as to whether dual muscle-tendon vibration is detrimental to the performance of goal-directed upper-limb movements. The current study aimed to determine the effects of muscle-tendon vibration over the wrist flexors and extensors (dual vibration) on performance of a computer goal-directed aiming task.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty healthy participants were assigned to the vibration or control group. An aiming task that involved acquiring targets by moving an unseen cursor on a screen was performed. Vision of the cursor and hand were unavailable throughout the four blocks of movement execution. Only the vibration group received dual vibration throughout four blocks. Task performance was assessed using measures of endpoint accuracy and timing. Perceived hand location was assessed using a set of questions and a computerised conscious perception task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The vibration group had significantly shorter reaction times, without any change in endpoint accuracy, indicating more efficient and effective movement planning. The vibration group did report illusory movement sensation, which was reduced by block 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dual vibration did not adversely affect aiming accuracy and showed some improvement in reaction time. The present findings support the potential for using dual vibration to stimulate the somatosensory system as participants improved their performance of a novel goal-directed movement. Notably, improvements were maintained when the vibration was removed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Somatosensory & motor research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Somatosensory & motor research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2023.2272971\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Somatosensory & motor research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2023.2272971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究了70-120Hz频率范围内的肌腱振动作为刺激体感传入的工具的应用,目的是研究人类的感觉运动控制和改善卒中后的运动表现。针对康复应用,目前关于双肌腱振动是否对目标导向上肢运动的表现有害的证据不一。目前的研究旨在确定手腕屈肌和伸肌上的肌腱振动(双重振动)对计算机目标定向瞄准任务性能的影响。方法:将20名健康参与者分为振动组或对照组。执行了一项瞄准任务,包括通过在屏幕上移动看不见的光标来获取目标。光标和手的视觉在四个动作执行块中都不可用。只有振动组在四个区块内受到双重振动。使用终点准确性和时间测量来评估任务绩效。使用一组问题和计算机化的意识感知任务来评估手的感知位置。结果:振动组的反应时间明显更短,终点精度没有任何变化,表明运动计划更有效。振动组确实报告了虚幻的运动感觉,区块4减少了这种感觉。结论:双重振动不会对瞄准精度产生不利影响,并且反应时间有所改善。目前的研究结果支持了使用双重振动来刺激体感系统的潜力,因为参与者提高了他们在新的目标导向运动中的表现。值得注意的是,在消除振动后,仍保持了改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dual muscle tendon vibration does not impede performance of a goal-directed aiming task.

Aims: Application of muscle-tendon vibration within the frequency range of 70-120Hz has been studied as a tool to stimulate somatosensory afferents with both the goal of studying human sensorimotor control and of improving post-stroke motor performance. Specific to applications for rehabilitation, current evidence is mixed as to whether dual muscle-tendon vibration is detrimental to the performance of goal-directed upper-limb movements. The current study aimed to determine the effects of muscle-tendon vibration over the wrist flexors and extensors (dual vibration) on performance of a computer goal-directed aiming task.

Methods: Twenty healthy participants were assigned to the vibration or control group. An aiming task that involved acquiring targets by moving an unseen cursor on a screen was performed. Vision of the cursor and hand were unavailable throughout the four blocks of movement execution. Only the vibration group received dual vibration throughout four blocks. Task performance was assessed using measures of endpoint accuracy and timing. Perceived hand location was assessed using a set of questions and a computerised conscious perception task.

Results: The vibration group had significantly shorter reaction times, without any change in endpoint accuracy, indicating more efficient and effective movement planning. The vibration group did report illusory movement sensation, which was reduced by block 4.

Conclusions: Dual vibration did not adversely affect aiming accuracy and showed some improvement in reaction time. The present findings support the potential for using dual vibration to stimulate the somatosensory system as participants improved their performance of a novel goal-directed movement. Notably, improvements were maintained when the vibration was removed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信