阿拉伯语背景下糖尿病识字、算术和知识工具的验证和心理测量评估。

Sanah Hasan, Hamzah Alzubaidi, Catarina Samorinha, Ahmed Al Radhaideh
{"title":"阿拉伯语背景下糖尿病识字、算术和知识工具的验证和心理测量评估。","authors":"Sanah Hasan, Hamzah Alzubaidi, Catarina Samorinha, Ahmed Al Radhaideh","doi":"10.1177/26350106231207349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to validate the Literacy Assessment for Diabetes (LAD), the Diabetes Numeracy Test (DNT), and the Simplified Diabetes Knowledge Test (DKT) in the Arabic language and context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three hundred eighty four, ≥18-year-old patients with type 1, type 2, or gestational diabetes mellitus were recruited from 3 endocrinology clinics in the United Arab Emirates. Exploratory factor analysis using principal component was performed. Achieved scores were compared using Pearson bivariate correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 60 LAD items loaded on 1 factor accounting for 66.7% of the variance, with internal consistency α = .991. Average score = 68.7%. Nineteen out of 26 items were retained on the DNT and grouped into 4 factors, prescription reading and directions, proper dose coverage, nutrition, and insulin, with good internal consistency (α = .721). Average score = 73.2%. All 20 DKT items loaded on 3 factors accounting for 41.2% of the variance, causes and consequences of the high blood sugar level, prevention of the disease, and misconceptions about diabetes self-management, with good internal consistency (α = .799). Average score = 71.9%. A moderate and significant correlation between the DKT and DNT (<i>r</i> = .56, <i>P</i> < .001) was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Three tools to assess diabetes literacy, numeracy, and knowledge were psychometrically tested to establish their validity and reliability in the Arabic language and context. The tools could be used to assess patient skills and competence in navigating the health care system and managing their diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":75187,"journal":{"name":"The science of diabetes self-management and care","volume":" ","pages":"449-461"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation and Psychometric Evaluation of Diabetes Literacy, Numeracy, and Knowledge Tools in the Arabic Context.\",\"authors\":\"Sanah Hasan, Hamzah Alzubaidi, Catarina Samorinha, Ahmed Al Radhaideh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26350106231207349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to validate the Literacy Assessment for Diabetes (LAD), the Diabetes Numeracy Test (DNT), and the Simplified Diabetes Knowledge Test (DKT) in the Arabic language and context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three hundred eighty four, ≥18-year-old patients with type 1, type 2, or gestational diabetes mellitus were recruited from 3 endocrinology clinics in the United Arab Emirates. Exploratory factor analysis using principal component was performed. Achieved scores were compared using Pearson bivariate correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 60 LAD items loaded on 1 factor accounting for 66.7% of the variance, with internal consistency α = .991. Average score = 68.7%. Nineteen out of 26 items were retained on the DNT and grouped into 4 factors, prescription reading and directions, proper dose coverage, nutrition, and insulin, with good internal consistency (α = .721). Average score = 73.2%. All 20 DKT items loaded on 3 factors accounting for 41.2% of the variance, causes and consequences of the high blood sugar level, prevention of the disease, and misconceptions about diabetes self-management, with good internal consistency (α = .799). Average score = 71.9%. A moderate and significant correlation between the DKT and DNT (<i>r</i> = .56, <i>P</i> < .001) was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Three tools to assess diabetes literacy, numeracy, and knowledge were psychometrically tested to establish their validity and reliability in the Arabic language and context. The tools could be used to assess patient skills and competence in navigating the health care system and managing their diabetes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The science of diabetes self-management and care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"449-461\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The science of diabetes self-management and care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26350106231207349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The science of diabetes self-management and care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26350106231207349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是在阿拉伯语和上下文中验证糖尿病识字评估(LAD)、糖尿病算术测试(DNT)和简化糖尿病知识测试(DKT)。方法:从阿拉伯联合酋长国的3家内分泌诊所招募384名≥18岁的1型、2型或妊娠期糖尿病患者。采用主成分进行探索性因素分析。使用Pearson双变量相关性对所获得的分数进行比较。结果:所有60个LAD项目加载1个因子,占方差的66.7%,具有内部一致性α = .991.平均分 = 68.7%。26个项目中有19个保留在DNT上,并分为4个因素,处方阅读和说明、适当剂量覆盖率、营养和胰岛素,具有良好的内部一致性(α = .721)。平均得分 = 73.2%。所有20个DKT项目加载了3个因素,占高血糖水平、疾病预防和糖尿病自我管理误解的方差、原因和后果的41.2%,具有良好的内部一致性(α = .799)。平均得分 = DKT和DNT之间存在中度和显著的相关性(r = .56,P 结论:对评估糖尿病识字、算术和知识的三种工具进行了心理测量测试,以确定其在阿拉伯语和上下文中的有效性和可靠性。这些工具可用于评估患者在医疗保健系统中导航和管理糖尿病的技能和能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation and Psychometric Evaluation of Diabetes Literacy, Numeracy, and Knowledge Tools in the Arabic Context.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to validate the Literacy Assessment for Diabetes (LAD), the Diabetes Numeracy Test (DNT), and the Simplified Diabetes Knowledge Test (DKT) in the Arabic language and context.

Methods: Three hundred eighty four, ≥18-year-old patients with type 1, type 2, or gestational diabetes mellitus were recruited from 3 endocrinology clinics in the United Arab Emirates. Exploratory factor analysis using principal component was performed. Achieved scores were compared using Pearson bivariate correlation.

Results: All 60 LAD items loaded on 1 factor accounting for 66.7% of the variance, with internal consistency α = .991. Average score = 68.7%. Nineteen out of 26 items were retained on the DNT and grouped into 4 factors, prescription reading and directions, proper dose coverage, nutrition, and insulin, with good internal consistency (α = .721). Average score = 73.2%. All 20 DKT items loaded on 3 factors accounting for 41.2% of the variance, causes and consequences of the high blood sugar level, prevention of the disease, and misconceptions about diabetes self-management, with good internal consistency (α = .799). Average score = 71.9%. A moderate and significant correlation between the DKT and DNT (r = .56, P < .001) was observed.

Conclusions: Three tools to assess diabetes literacy, numeracy, and knowledge were psychometrically tested to establish their validity and reliability in the Arabic language and context. The tools could be used to assess patient skills and competence in navigating the health care system and managing their diabetes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信