骨髓瘤患者自体造血细胞移植的动员策略。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy Pub Date : 2023-08-24 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1159/000531940
Esa Jantunen, Anu Partanen, Antti Turunen, Ville Varmavuo, Raija Silvennoinen
{"title":"骨髓瘤患者自体造血细胞移植的动员策略。","authors":"Esa Jantunen,&nbsp;Anu Partanen,&nbsp;Antti Turunen,&nbsp;Ville Varmavuo,&nbsp;Raija Silvennoinen","doi":"10.1159/000531940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple myeloma is currently the leading indication for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). A prerequisite for AHCT is mobilization and collection of adequate blood graft to support high-dose therapy. Current mobilization strategies include granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or in combination with chemotherapy most commonly cyclophosphamide (CY). More recently, plerixafor has become into agenda especially in patients who mobilize poorly. In the selection of a mobilization method, several factors should be considered.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Preplanned collection target is important as G-CSF plus plerixafor is more effective in the mobilization of CD34<sup>+</sup> cells than G-CSF alone. On the other hand, CY plus G-CSF is superior to G-CSF only mobilization. Previous therapy and age of the patients are important considerations as G-CSF alone may not be effective enough in patients with risk factors for poor mobilization. These factors include extensive lenalidomide exposure, irradiation to bone marrow-bearing sites, higher age, or a previous mobilization failure. Also, local preferences and experiences as well as the number of apheresis needed are important issues as well as cost-effectiveness considerations. Mobilization method used may have implication for cellular composition of collected grafts, which might have an impact on posttransplant events such as hematologic and immune recovery in addition to also potential long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Key message: </strong>Currently, G-CSF alone and preemptive plerixafor if needed might be considered as a standard mobilization strategy in MM patients intended for AHCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":23252,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy","volume":"50 5","pages":"438-447"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603622/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mobilization Strategies in Myeloma Patients Intended for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Esa Jantunen,&nbsp;Anu Partanen,&nbsp;Antti Turunen,&nbsp;Ville Varmavuo,&nbsp;Raija Silvennoinen\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000531940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple myeloma is currently the leading indication for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). A prerequisite for AHCT is mobilization and collection of adequate blood graft to support high-dose therapy. Current mobilization strategies include granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or in combination with chemotherapy most commonly cyclophosphamide (CY). More recently, plerixafor has become into agenda especially in patients who mobilize poorly. In the selection of a mobilization method, several factors should be considered.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Preplanned collection target is important as G-CSF plus plerixafor is more effective in the mobilization of CD34<sup>+</sup> cells than G-CSF alone. On the other hand, CY plus G-CSF is superior to G-CSF only mobilization. Previous therapy and age of the patients are important considerations as G-CSF alone may not be effective enough in patients with risk factors for poor mobilization. These factors include extensive lenalidomide exposure, irradiation to bone marrow-bearing sites, higher age, or a previous mobilization failure. Also, local preferences and experiences as well as the number of apheresis needed are important issues as well as cost-effectiveness considerations. Mobilization method used may have implication for cellular composition of collected grafts, which might have an impact on posttransplant events such as hematologic and immune recovery in addition to also potential long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Key message: </strong>Currently, G-CSF alone and preemptive plerixafor if needed might be considered as a standard mobilization strategy in MM patients intended for AHCT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy\",\"volume\":\"50 5\",\"pages\":\"438-447\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603622/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000531940\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000531940","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:多发性骨髓瘤是目前自体造血细胞移植(AHCT)的主要适应症。AHCT的先决条件是动员和收集足够的移植物来支持高剂量治疗。目前的动员策略包括单独使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)或与化疗联合使用,最常见的是环磷酰胺(CY)。最近,普乐沙福已经成为一项议程,尤其是在那些行动不便的患者中。在选择动员方法时,应考虑几个因素。总结:预先计划的收集靶点很重要,因为G-CSF加普利沙福在动员CD34+细胞方面比单独的G-CSF更有效。另一方面,CY加G-CSF动员优于仅G-CSF动员。先前的治疗和患者的年龄是重要的考虑因素,因为单独的G-CSF对有动员不良危险因素的患者可能不够有效。这些因素包括广泛的来那度胺暴露、骨髓承载部位的照射、较高的年龄或先前的动员失败。此外,当地的偏好和经验以及需要单采的数量也是重要的问题,也是成本效益方面的考虑因素。所使用的动员方法可能对收集的移植物的细胞组成有影响,这可能对移植后事件产生影响,如血液学和免疫恢复,以及潜在的长期结果。关键信息:目前,如果需要,单独使用G-CSF和先发制人的普利沙福可能被视为用于AHCT的MM患者的标准动员策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mobilization Strategies in Myeloma Patients Intended for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Background: Multiple myeloma is currently the leading indication for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). A prerequisite for AHCT is mobilization and collection of adequate blood graft to support high-dose therapy. Current mobilization strategies include granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or in combination with chemotherapy most commonly cyclophosphamide (CY). More recently, plerixafor has become into agenda especially in patients who mobilize poorly. In the selection of a mobilization method, several factors should be considered.

Summary: Preplanned collection target is important as G-CSF plus plerixafor is more effective in the mobilization of CD34+ cells than G-CSF alone. On the other hand, CY plus G-CSF is superior to G-CSF only mobilization. Previous therapy and age of the patients are important considerations as G-CSF alone may not be effective enough in patients with risk factors for poor mobilization. These factors include extensive lenalidomide exposure, irradiation to bone marrow-bearing sites, higher age, or a previous mobilization failure. Also, local preferences and experiences as well as the number of apheresis needed are important issues as well as cost-effectiveness considerations. Mobilization method used may have implication for cellular composition of collected grafts, which might have an impact on posttransplant events such as hematologic and immune recovery in addition to also potential long-term outcomes.

Key message: Currently, G-CSF alone and preemptive plerixafor if needed might be considered as a standard mobilization strategy in MM patients intended for AHCT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal is devoted to all areas of transfusion medicine. These include the quality and security of blood products, therapy with blood components and plasma derivatives, transfusion-related questions in transplantation, stem cell manipulation, therapeutic and diagnostic problems of homeostasis, immuno-hematological investigations, and legal aspects of the production of blood products as well as hemotherapy. Both comprehensive reviews and primary publications that detail the newest work in transfusion medicine and hemotherapy promote the international exchange of knowledge within these disciplines. Consistent with this goal, continuing clinical education is also specifically addressed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信