在动物研究中,历史对照组数据可以用来代替同期对照吗?

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY
Toxicologic Pathology Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1177/01926233231208987
Thomas Steger-Hartmann, Matthew Clark
{"title":"在动物研究中,历史对照组数据可以用来代替同期对照吗?","authors":"Thomas Steger-Hartmann, Matthew Clark","doi":"10.1177/01926233231208987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The availability of large amounts of high-quality control data from tightly controlled regulated animal safety data has created the idea to re-use these data beyond its classical applications of quality control, identification of treatment-related effects and assessing effect-size relevance for building virtual control groups (VCGs). While the ethical and cost-saving aspects of such a concept are immediately evident, the potential challenges need to be carefully considered to avoid any effect which could lower the sensitivity of an animal study to detect adverse events, safety thresholds, target organs, or biomarkers. In our brief communication, we summarize the current discussion regarding VCGs and propose a path forward how the replacement of concurrent control with VCGs resulting from historical data could be systematically assessed and to come to conclusions regarding the scientific value of the concept.</p>","PeriodicalId":23113,"journal":{"name":"Toxicologic Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Historical Control Group Data Be Used to Replace Concurrent Controls in Animal Studies?\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Steger-Hartmann, Matthew Clark\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01926233231208987\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The availability of large amounts of high-quality control data from tightly controlled regulated animal safety data has created the idea to re-use these data beyond its classical applications of quality control, identification of treatment-related effects and assessing effect-size relevance for building virtual control groups (VCGs). While the ethical and cost-saving aspects of such a concept are immediately evident, the potential challenges need to be carefully considered to avoid any effect which could lower the sensitivity of an animal study to detect adverse events, safety thresholds, target organs, or biomarkers. In our brief communication, we summarize the current discussion regarding VCGs and propose a path forward how the replacement of concurrent control with VCGs resulting from historical data could be systematically assessed and to come to conclusions regarding the scientific value of the concept.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicologic Pathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicologic Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01926233231208987\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicologic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01926233231208987","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从严格控制的动物安全数据中获得大量高质量的对照数据,创造了在质量控制、识别治疗相关效果和评估效果大小相关性以建立虚拟对照组(VCG)的经典应用之外重复使用这些数据的想法。虽然这一概念的伦理和成本节约方面显而易见,但需要仔细考虑潜在的挑战,以避免任何可能降低动物研究检测不良事件、安全阈值、靶器官或生物标志物灵敏度的影响。在我们的简短交流中,我们总结了当前关于VCG的讨论,并提出了一条前进的道路,即如何系统地评估用历史数据产生的VCG取代并发控制,并得出有关该概念科学价值的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can Historical Control Group Data Be Used to Replace Concurrent Controls in Animal Studies?

The availability of large amounts of high-quality control data from tightly controlled regulated animal safety data has created the idea to re-use these data beyond its classical applications of quality control, identification of treatment-related effects and assessing effect-size relevance for building virtual control groups (VCGs). While the ethical and cost-saving aspects of such a concept are immediately evident, the potential challenges need to be carefully considered to avoid any effect which could lower the sensitivity of an animal study to detect adverse events, safety thresholds, target organs, or biomarkers. In our brief communication, we summarize the current discussion regarding VCGs and propose a path forward how the replacement of concurrent control with VCGs resulting from historical data could be systematically assessed and to come to conclusions regarding the scientific value of the concept.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxicologic Pathology
Toxicologic Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxicologic Pathology is dedicated to the promotion of human, animal, and environmental health through the dissemination of knowledge, techniques, and guidelines to enhance the understanding and practice of toxicologic pathology. Toxicologic Pathology, the official journal of the Society of Toxicologic Pathology, will publish Original Research Articles, Symposium Articles, Review Articles, Meeting Reports, New Techniques, and Position Papers that are relevant to toxicologic pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信