Berg平衡量表在老年女性椎体压缩性骨折中的微小重要变化:一项回顾性多中心研究。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
PM&R Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-27 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13092
Sota Kobayashi, Kazuhiro Miyata, Shuntaro Tamura, Ren Takeda, Hiroki Iwamoto
{"title":"Berg平衡量表在老年女性椎体压缩性骨折中的微小重要变化:一项回顾性多中心研究。","authors":"Sota Kobayashi, Kazuhiro Miyata, Shuntaro Tamura, Ren Takeda, Hiroki Iwamoto","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vertebral compression fractures, which are commonly associated with older age and osteoporotic fractures, have an increased risk of re-fracture. Therefore, improving balance is important to prevent falls. The minimal important change (MIC) has been recommended for interpreting clinically meaningful changes in rating scales. The MIC of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) for use in older women with vertebral compression fractures has not been established.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the MIC of the BBS that can be used in older women with vertebral compression fractures using predictive modeling methods and the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC)-based method.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective longitudinal multicenter study.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Sixty older women (mean age ± standard deviation: 84.1 ± 7.0 years) with vertebral compression fractures who were unable to ambulate independently on a level surface.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A change of one point in the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) was used as an anchor to calculate the MIC of the BBS based on the change between admission and discharge. We calculated the MIC for the women whose FAC score improved by ≥1 point. We used three anchor-based methods to examine the MIC: the ROC-based method (MIC<sub>ROC</sub>), the predictive modeling method (MIC<sub>pred</sub>), and the MIC<sub>pred</sub>-based method adjusted by the rate of improvement and reliability of transition (MIC<sub>adj</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine women comprised the \"important change\" group based on their FAC score improvement. In this group, the MIC<sub>ROC</sub> (95% confidence interval [CI]) value of the BBS was 10.0 points (5.5-15.5), with an area under the curve of 0.71. The MIC<sub>pred</sub> (95% CI) value was 9.7 (8.1-11.0), and the MIC<sub>adj</sub> (95% CI) was 7.0 (5.5-8.5) points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For women with vertebral compression fractures who are unable to ambulate independently, a 7.0-point improvement in the BBS score may be a useful indicator for reducing the amount of assistance required for walking.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":"715-722"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimal important change in the Berg Balance Scale in older women with vertebral compression fractures: A retrospective multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Sota Kobayashi, Kazuhiro Miyata, Shuntaro Tamura, Ren Takeda, Hiroki Iwamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmrj.13092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vertebral compression fractures, which are commonly associated with older age and osteoporotic fractures, have an increased risk of re-fracture. Therefore, improving balance is important to prevent falls. The minimal important change (MIC) has been recommended for interpreting clinically meaningful changes in rating scales. The MIC of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) for use in older women with vertebral compression fractures has not been established.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the MIC of the BBS that can be used in older women with vertebral compression fractures using predictive modeling methods and the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC)-based method.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective longitudinal multicenter study.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Sixty older women (mean age ± standard deviation: 84.1 ± 7.0 years) with vertebral compression fractures who were unable to ambulate independently on a level surface.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A change of one point in the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) was used as an anchor to calculate the MIC of the BBS based on the change between admission and discharge. We calculated the MIC for the women whose FAC score improved by ≥1 point. We used three anchor-based methods to examine the MIC: the ROC-based method (MIC<sub>ROC</sub>), the predictive modeling method (MIC<sub>pred</sub>), and the MIC<sub>pred</sub>-based method adjusted by the rate of improvement and reliability of transition (MIC<sub>adj</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine women comprised the \\\"important change\\\" group based on their FAC score improvement. In this group, the MIC<sub>ROC</sub> (95% confidence interval [CI]) value of the BBS was 10.0 points (5.5-15.5), with an area under the curve of 0.71. The MIC<sub>pred</sub> (95% CI) value was 9.7 (8.1-11.0), and the MIC<sub>adj</sub> (95% CI) was 7.0 (5.5-8.5) points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For women with vertebral compression fractures who are unable to ambulate independently, a 7.0-point improvement in the BBS score may be a useful indicator for reducing the amount of assistance required for walking.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PM&R\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"715-722\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PM&R\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13092\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:椎体压缩性骨折通常与老年和骨质疏松性骨折有关,其再次骨折的风险增加。因此,提高平衡功能对于防止跌倒非常重要。最小重要变化(MIC)已被推荐用于解释评分量表中有临床意义的变化。Berg平衡量表用于老年女性脊椎压缩性骨折的MIC尚未确定。目的:使用预测建模方法和受试者操作特征(ROC)方法,确定Berg平衡量表的MIC,该量表可用于老年女性椎体压缩性骨折。设计:一项回顾性纵向多中心研究。患者:60名老年妇女(年龄84.1 ± 7 年)的脊椎压缩性骨折患者,他们不能在水平表面上独立行走。方法:以功能性伏击类别(FAC)中一个点的变化为锚,根据入院和出院之间的变化计算伯格平衡量表的MIC。我们计算了FAC评分提高≥1分的女性的MIC。我们使用了三种基于锚的方法来检查MIC:基于ROC的方法(MICROC)、预测建模方法(MICpred)和基于MICpred的方法(根据改善率和过渡可靠性调整MICadj)。在该组中,伯格平衡量表的MICROC(95%CI)值为10.0分(5.5-15.5),曲线下面积为0.71。MICpred(95%置信区间)值为9.7(8.1-11.0),MICadj(95%可信区间)为7.0(5.5-8.5)分。结论:对于无法独立行走的脊椎压缩性骨折女性,Berg平衡量表评分提高7.0分可能是减少行走所需辅助量的有用指标。这篇文章受版权保护。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimal important change in the Berg Balance Scale in older women with vertebral compression fractures: A retrospective multicenter study.

Background: Vertebral compression fractures, which are commonly associated with older age and osteoporotic fractures, have an increased risk of re-fracture. Therefore, improving balance is important to prevent falls. The minimal important change (MIC) has been recommended for interpreting clinically meaningful changes in rating scales. The MIC of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) for use in older women with vertebral compression fractures has not been established.

Objective: To identify the MIC of the BBS that can be used in older women with vertebral compression fractures using predictive modeling methods and the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC)-based method.

Design: A retrospective longitudinal multicenter study.

Patients: Sixty older women (mean age ± standard deviation: 84.1 ± 7.0 years) with vertebral compression fractures who were unable to ambulate independently on a level surface.

Methods: A change of one point in the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) was used as an anchor to calculate the MIC of the BBS based on the change between admission and discharge. We calculated the MIC for the women whose FAC score improved by ≥1 point. We used three anchor-based methods to examine the MIC: the ROC-based method (MICROC), the predictive modeling method (MICpred), and the MICpred-based method adjusted by the rate of improvement and reliability of transition (MICadj).

Results: Thirty-nine women comprised the "important change" group based on their FAC score improvement. In this group, the MICROC (95% confidence interval [CI]) value of the BBS was 10.0 points (5.5-15.5), with an area under the curve of 0.71. The MICpred (95% CI) value was 9.7 (8.1-11.0), and the MICadj (95% CI) was 7.0 (5.5-8.5) points.

Conclusion: For women with vertebral compression fractures who are unable to ambulate independently, a 7.0-point improvement in the BBS score may be a useful indicator for reducing the amount of assistance required for walking.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信