巴里西替尼治疗系统性红斑狼疮的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2.1 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Abdallah R Allam, Mohamed Salah Alhateem, Abdelrahman Mohamed Mahmoud
{"title":"巴里西替尼治疗系统性红斑狼疮的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Abdallah R Allam,&nbsp;Mohamed Salah Alhateem,&nbsp;Abdelrahman Mohamed Mahmoud","doi":"10.1186/s41927-023-00363-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>SLE is an autoimmune disease marked by broad immunological dysregulation and multi-system inflammation. Baricitinib is one of the novel treatments for SLE. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate its safety and effectiveness in treating SLE.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We looked for all published randomized controlled trials in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane and included all RCTs comparing baricitinib and placebo in the treatment of SLE. Review Manager 5.4 program was used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three trials with a total of 1849 individuals were included. Participants in the baricitinib group were significantly more likely to attain SRI-4 response than those in the placebo group [RR = 1.11, 95% CI (1.02, 1.21), P = 0.01]. Additionally, baricitinib performed better than the placebo in terms of reduction of ≥ 4 points from baseline in SLEDAI-2 K score [RR = 1.13, 95% CI (1.04, 1.22), P = 0.004]. In terms of SLEDAI-2 K remission of arthritis or rash, baricitinib was also superior to placebo [RR = 1.08, 95% CI (1.00, 1.17), P = 0.04]. Treatment-emergent adverse events did not differ significantly [RR = 1.01, 95% CI (0.97, 1.05), P = 0.61].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Baricitinib is potentially safe and effective in the treatment of SLE. It has successfully met the study's primary endpoint and some secondary endpoints highlighting its potential to improve the outcomes of SLE. Despite achieving an SRI-4 response, glucocorticoids sparing and some other secondary outcomes weren't reached by baricitinib.</p>","PeriodicalId":9150,"journal":{"name":"BMC Rheumatology","volume":"7 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10617176/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of baricitinib in treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Abdallah R Allam,&nbsp;Mohamed Salah Alhateem,&nbsp;Abdelrahman Mohamed Mahmoud\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41927-023-00363-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>SLE is an autoimmune disease marked by broad immunological dysregulation and multi-system inflammation. Baricitinib is one of the novel treatments for SLE. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate its safety and effectiveness in treating SLE.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We looked for all published randomized controlled trials in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane and included all RCTs comparing baricitinib and placebo in the treatment of SLE. Review Manager 5.4 program was used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three trials with a total of 1849 individuals were included. Participants in the baricitinib group were significantly more likely to attain SRI-4 response than those in the placebo group [RR = 1.11, 95% CI (1.02, 1.21), P = 0.01]. Additionally, baricitinib performed better than the placebo in terms of reduction of ≥ 4 points from baseline in SLEDAI-2 K score [RR = 1.13, 95% CI (1.04, 1.22), P = 0.004]. In terms of SLEDAI-2 K remission of arthritis or rash, baricitinib was also superior to placebo [RR = 1.08, 95% CI (1.00, 1.17), P = 0.04]. Treatment-emergent adverse events did not differ significantly [RR = 1.01, 95% CI (0.97, 1.05), P = 0.61].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Baricitinib is potentially safe and effective in the treatment of SLE. It has successfully met the study's primary endpoint and some secondary endpoints highlighting its potential to improve the outcomes of SLE. Despite achieving an SRI-4 response, glucocorticoids sparing and some other secondary outcomes weren't reached by baricitinib.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10617176/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-023-00363-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-023-00363-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:SLE是一种自身免疫性疾病,以广泛的免疫失调和多系统炎症为特征。巴里西替尼是治疗SLE的新方法之一。我们进行了这项荟萃分析,以评估其治疗SLE的安全性和有效性。方法:我们查阅了PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane上所有已发表的随机对照试验,并纳入了所有比较巴里西替尼和安慰剂治疗SLE的随机对照研究。Review Manager 5.4程序用于数据分析。结果:纳入了三项试验,共1849人。巴里西替尼组的参与者比安慰剂组的参与者更有可能获得SRI-4反应[RR = 1.11,95%置信区间(1.021.21),P = 0.01]。此外,巴里西替尼在≥ SLEDAI-2 K评分比基线低4分[RR = 1.13,95%置信区间(1.04,1.22),P = 0.004]。就SLEDAI-2K关节炎或皮疹的缓解而言,巴里西替尼也优于安慰剂[RR = 1.08,95%置信区间(1.001.17),P = 0.04]。治疗引发的不良事件没有显著差异[RR = 1.01,95%置信区间(0.97,1.05),P = 结论:巴里西替尼治疗SLE具有潜在的安全性和有效性。它成功地达到了研究的主要终点和一些次要终点,突出了它改善SLE预后的潜力。尽管实现了SRI-4反应,但巴里西替尼并未达到糖皮质激素保留和其他一些次要结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy and safety of baricitinib in treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Efficacy and safety of baricitinib in treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Efficacy and safety of baricitinib in treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Efficacy and safety of baricitinib in treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: SLE is an autoimmune disease marked by broad immunological dysregulation and multi-system inflammation. Baricitinib is one of the novel treatments for SLE. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate its safety and effectiveness in treating SLE.

Method: We looked for all published randomized controlled trials in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane and included all RCTs comparing baricitinib and placebo in the treatment of SLE. Review Manager 5.4 program was used for data analysis.

Results: Three trials with a total of 1849 individuals were included. Participants in the baricitinib group were significantly more likely to attain SRI-4 response than those in the placebo group [RR = 1.11, 95% CI (1.02, 1.21), P = 0.01]. Additionally, baricitinib performed better than the placebo in terms of reduction of ≥ 4 points from baseline in SLEDAI-2 K score [RR = 1.13, 95% CI (1.04, 1.22), P = 0.004]. In terms of SLEDAI-2 K remission of arthritis or rash, baricitinib was also superior to placebo [RR = 1.08, 95% CI (1.00, 1.17), P = 0.04]. Treatment-emergent adverse events did not differ significantly [RR = 1.01, 95% CI (0.97, 1.05), P = 0.61].

Conclusion: Baricitinib is potentially safe and effective in the treatment of SLE. It has successfully met the study's primary endpoint and some secondary endpoints highlighting its potential to improve the outcomes of SLE. Despite achieving an SRI-4 response, glucocorticoids sparing and some other secondary outcomes weren't reached by baricitinib.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Rheumatology
BMC Rheumatology Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信