日本皮肤癌症前哨淋巴结活检的回顾性研究:与癌症的比较及其使用相关因素的评估。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI:10.1002/cam4.6677
Shogo Wada, Tomone Watanabe, Taisuke Ishii, Yuichi Ichinose, Ryoko Rikitake, Dai Ogata, Eiji Nakano, Kenjiro Namikawa, Naoya Yamazaki, Takahiro Higashi
{"title":"日本皮肤癌症前哨淋巴结活检的回顾性研究:与癌症的比较及其使用相关因素的评估。","authors":"Shogo Wada,&nbsp;Tomone Watanabe,&nbsp;Taisuke Ishii,&nbsp;Yuichi Ichinose,&nbsp;Ryoko Rikitake,&nbsp;Dai Ogata,&nbsp;Eiji Nakano,&nbsp;Kenjiro Namikawa,&nbsp;Naoya Yamazaki,&nbsp;Takahiro Higashi","doi":"10.1002/cam4.6677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) underuse has been reported for skin cancers; however, actual performance rates have not been compared. The objective of this study was to investigate the SLNB performance rate in skin cancers covered by health insurance in Japan and compare it with that in breast cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a retrospective study of the SLNB performance rate in SLNB-eligible patients with breast or skin cancer from 2018 to 2019, utilizing a database linked to the Hospital-Based Cancer Registry and Diagnosis Procedure Combination survey. Demographic and tumor characteristics were analyzed using logistic regression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 71,652 patients were included in this study. SLNB was performed in 86.4% (57,904/67,036) of the patients with breast cancer, 44.7% (694/1552) with melanomas, 3.1% (89/2849) with squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), and 13.5% (29/215) with Merkel cell carcinomas (MCCs). The performance rate of SLNB was significantly lower for skin cancers than for breast cancers (odds ratio [OR], 0.03; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In addition, the performance rates of SLNB were significantly lower for SCCs and MCCs than for melanomas (SCC: OR, 0.04; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; MCC: OR, 0.19; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Factors associated with SLNB performance included age, sex, year of incidence, primary tumor site, T stage, and number of hospital beds.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>SLNB is underutilized for skin cancer. Further investigation is required to explore the reasons for its underutilization so that it may be implemented more universally.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"12 23","pages":"21364-21372"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.6677","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A retrospective study of sentinel lymph node biopsy for skin cancer in Japan: Comparison with breast cancer and evaluation of factors related to its use\",\"authors\":\"Shogo Wada,&nbsp;Tomone Watanabe,&nbsp;Taisuke Ishii,&nbsp;Yuichi Ichinose,&nbsp;Ryoko Rikitake,&nbsp;Dai Ogata,&nbsp;Eiji Nakano,&nbsp;Kenjiro Namikawa,&nbsp;Naoya Yamazaki,&nbsp;Takahiro Higashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cam4.6677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) underuse has been reported for skin cancers; however, actual performance rates have not been compared. The objective of this study was to investigate the SLNB performance rate in skin cancers covered by health insurance in Japan and compare it with that in breast cancer.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This was a retrospective study of the SLNB performance rate in SLNB-eligible patients with breast or skin cancer from 2018 to 2019, utilizing a database linked to the Hospital-Based Cancer Registry and Diagnosis Procedure Combination survey. Demographic and tumor characteristics were analyzed using logistic regression.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 71,652 patients were included in this study. SLNB was performed in 86.4% (57,904/67,036) of the patients with breast cancer, 44.7% (694/1552) with melanomas, 3.1% (89/2849) with squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), and 13.5% (29/215) with Merkel cell carcinomas (MCCs). The performance rate of SLNB was significantly lower for skin cancers than for breast cancers (odds ratio [OR], 0.03; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In addition, the performance rates of SLNB were significantly lower for SCCs and MCCs than for melanomas (SCC: OR, 0.04; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; MCC: OR, 0.19; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Factors associated with SLNB performance included age, sex, year of incidence, primary tumor site, T stage, and number of hospital beds.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>SLNB is underutilized for skin cancer. Further investigation is required to explore the reasons for its underutilization so that it may be implemented more universally.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 23\",\"pages\":\"21364-21372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.6677\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.6677\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.6677","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)在皮肤癌中的应用不足;然而,尚未对实际绩效进行比较。本研究的目的是调查日本健康保险范围内皮肤癌的SLNB执行率,并将其与癌症的SLNB绩效进行比较。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,利用与基于医院的癌症登记和诊断程序组合调查相关的数据库,对2018年至2019年癌症乳腺癌或皮肤癌SLNB不合格患者的SLNB表现率进行了回顾性研究。使用逻辑回归分析人口统计学和肿瘤特征。结果:本研究共纳入71652例患者。在86.4%(57904/67036)的癌症患者、44.7%(694/1552)的黑色素瘤患者、3.1%(89/2849)的鳞状细胞癌(SCC)患者和13.5%(29/215)的默克尔细胞癌(MCC)患者中进行了SLNB。皮肤癌的SLNB表现率明显低于乳腺癌(比值比[OR],0.03;p 结论:SLNB在癌症治疗中应用不足。需要进一步调查,以探讨其利用不足的原因,以便更普遍地实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A retrospective study of sentinel lymph node biopsy for skin cancer in Japan: Comparison with breast cancer and evaluation of factors related to its use

Background

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) underuse has been reported for skin cancers; however, actual performance rates have not been compared. The objective of this study was to investigate the SLNB performance rate in skin cancers covered by health insurance in Japan and compare it with that in breast cancer.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of the SLNB performance rate in SLNB-eligible patients with breast or skin cancer from 2018 to 2019, utilizing a database linked to the Hospital-Based Cancer Registry and Diagnosis Procedure Combination survey. Demographic and tumor characteristics were analyzed using logistic regression.

Results

A total of 71,652 patients were included in this study. SLNB was performed in 86.4% (57,904/67,036) of the patients with breast cancer, 44.7% (694/1552) with melanomas, 3.1% (89/2849) with squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), and 13.5% (29/215) with Merkel cell carcinomas (MCCs). The performance rate of SLNB was significantly lower for skin cancers than for breast cancers (odds ratio [OR], 0.03; p < 0.001). In addition, the performance rates of SLNB were significantly lower for SCCs and MCCs than for melanomas (SCC: OR, 0.04; p < 0.001; MCC: OR, 0.19; p < 0.001). Factors associated with SLNB performance included age, sex, year of incidence, primary tumor site, T stage, and number of hospital beds.

Conclusions

SLNB is underutilized for skin cancer. Further investigation is required to explore the reasons for its underutilization so that it may be implemented more universally.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信