{"title":"“没有什么本身就是现实”。Thomas Luckmann, Hans-Georg Soeffner和Georg Vobruba之间的对话","authors":"T. Luckmann, Hans-Georg Soeffner, G. Vobruba","doi":"10.7238/D.V0I18.2951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thomas Luckmann and Hans-Georg Soeffner never shared a direct teacher-scholar-relationship. But both represent a sociological approach, rooted in phenomenology, and both treat everyday life, Religion and knowledge (among others) as their research subjects. In contrast my interests focus on political and economic problems, on European integration, social security and things like that. We found a broad common ground for our debate anyway, much more than we are able to document in this protocol. Perhaps this is because we tacitly agree in the following: In order to explain the development of institutions, one has to understand the way people act. And in order to understand peoples’ actions one has to observe how people observe social reality. But perhaps another thing matters as well. It quickly turned out that we three are heavily inclined to irony and – yes – nonsense. Thus, to me the debate with Thomas Luckmann and Hans-Georg Soeffner was impressive and fun. I really hope the protocol reveals this.","PeriodicalId":51964,"journal":{"name":"Digithum","volume":"1 1","pages":"44-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"«Nothing is reality in itself». A conversation between Thomas Luckmann, Hans-Georg Soeffner and Georg Vobruba\",\"authors\":\"T. Luckmann, Hans-Georg Soeffner, G. Vobruba\",\"doi\":\"10.7238/D.V0I18.2951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thomas Luckmann and Hans-Georg Soeffner never shared a direct teacher-scholar-relationship. But both represent a sociological approach, rooted in phenomenology, and both treat everyday life, Religion and knowledge (among others) as their research subjects. In contrast my interests focus on political and economic problems, on European integration, social security and things like that. We found a broad common ground for our debate anyway, much more than we are able to document in this protocol. Perhaps this is because we tacitly agree in the following: In order to explain the development of institutions, one has to understand the way people act. And in order to understand peoples’ actions one has to observe how people observe social reality. But perhaps another thing matters as well. It quickly turned out that we three are heavily inclined to irony and – yes – nonsense. Thus, to me the debate with Thomas Luckmann and Hans-Georg Soeffner was impressive and fun. I really hope the protocol reveals this.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digithum\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"44-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digithum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7238/D.V0I18.2951\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digithum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7238/D.V0I18.2951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
Thomas Luckmann和Hans-Georg Soeffner从来没有直接的老师-学者关系。但两者都代表了一种根植于现象学的社会学方法,都把日常生活、宗教和知识(以及其他)作为他们的研究对象。相比之下,我的兴趣集中在政治和经济问题上,比如欧洲一体化、社会保障等。无论如何,我们为我们的辩论找到了广泛的共同点,远远超过了我们在本协议中所能记录的。也许这是因为我们在以下方面达成了默契:为了解释制度的发展,我们必须理解人们的行为方式。为了理解人们的行为,我们必须观察人们如何观察社会现实。但也许另一件事也很重要。事实很快证明,我们三个人都非常倾向于讽刺和——是的——胡说八道。因此,对我来说,与Thomas Luckmann和Hans-Georg Soeffner的辩论令人印象深刻,也很有趣。我真希望协议能说明这一点。
«Nothing is reality in itself». A conversation between Thomas Luckmann, Hans-Georg Soeffner and Georg Vobruba
Thomas Luckmann and Hans-Georg Soeffner never shared a direct teacher-scholar-relationship. But both represent a sociological approach, rooted in phenomenology, and both treat everyday life, Religion and knowledge (among others) as their research subjects. In contrast my interests focus on political and economic problems, on European integration, social security and things like that. We found a broad common ground for our debate anyway, much more than we are able to document in this protocol. Perhaps this is because we tacitly agree in the following: In order to explain the development of institutions, one has to understand the way people act. And in order to understand peoples’ actions one has to observe how people observe social reality. But perhaps another thing matters as well. It quickly turned out that we three are heavily inclined to irony and – yes – nonsense. Thus, to me the debate with Thomas Luckmann and Hans-Georg Soeffner was impressive and fun. I really hope the protocol reveals this.
期刊介绍:
Digithum applies a relational perspective in the analysis of processes of inclusion and social exclusion, subjective experiences, social ties, cultural heritage and cultural production and consumption.