项目功能差异:基于澳大利亚和印度尼西亚数据库的TIMSS数学测试项目的项目水平分析

IF 0.3 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Fitriati
{"title":"项目功能差异:基于澳大利亚和印度尼西亚数据库的TIMSS数学测试项目的项目水平分析","authors":"Fitriati","doi":"10.7454/mssh.v18i2.3467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) aims to provide a broad perspective for evaluating and improving education. This assessment also ranks the participant countries based on their performance and makes inferences about factors affecting achievement and learning. However, the study may not function as it was expected because of differences in curricular, cultural, or language settings among countries. Consequently, this challenges assumptions about measurement equivalency. The present study aims to assess the equivalency of mathematics items on the TIMSS (2007) study across Australian and Indonesia. Students’ responses were subjected to Rasch analysis to determine DIF items. The results revealed that many items of mathematics tests are problematic because they showed significant bias. The study also found that Australian students performed better and found mathematics items on the test easier than their Indonesian counterparts did. Several factors such as curricular differences, methods used to solve mathematics problems, availability of textbooks and teachers’ quality might explain the existence of DIF between the countries. These findings indicate that serious limitations of using TIMSS results in comparing the performance of students across countries. Thus, further empirical evidence is needed before TIMSS 2007 results can be meaningfully used in research. Keywords: DIF items, mathematics test items, Rasch model","PeriodicalId":53785,"journal":{"name":"Makara Hubs-Asia","volume":"18 1","pages":"127-139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential Item Functioning: Item Level Analysis of TIMSS Mathematics Test Items Using Australian and Indonesian Database\",\"authors\":\"Fitriati\",\"doi\":\"10.7454/mssh.v18i2.3467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) aims to provide a broad perspective for evaluating and improving education. This assessment also ranks the participant countries based on their performance and makes inferences about factors affecting achievement and learning. However, the study may not function as it was expected because of differences in curricular, cultural, or language settings among countries. Consequently, this challenges assumptions about measurement equivalency. The present study aims to assess the equivalency of mathematics items on the TIMSS (2007) study across Australian and Indonesia. Students’ responses were subjected to Rasch analysis to determine DIF items. The results revealed that many items of mathematics tests are problematic because they showed significant bias. The study also found that Australian students performed better and found mathematics items on the test easier than their Indonesian counterparts did. Several factors such as curricular differences, methods used to solve mathematics problems, availability of textbooks and teachers’ quality might explain the existence of DIF between the countries. These findings indicate that serious limitations of using TIMSS results in comparing the performance of students across countries. Thus, further empirical evidence is needed before TIMSS 2007 results can be meaningfully used in research. Keywords: DIF items, mathematics test items, Rasch model\",\"PeriodicalId\":53785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Makara Hubs-Asia\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"127-139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Makara Hubs-Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v18i2.3467\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Makara Hubs-Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v18i2.3467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国际数学与科学趋势研究(TIMSS)旨在为评估和改善教育提供一个广阔的视角。该评估还根据参与国家的表现对其进行排名,并对影响成绩和学习的因素进行推断。然而,由于各国的课程、文化或语言设置的差异,这项研究可能不会像预期的那样发挥作用。因此,这挑战了关于测量等效的假设。本研究旨在评估澳大利亚和印度尼西亚TIMSS(2007)研究中数学项目的等效性。对学生的回答进行Rasch分析以确定DIF项目。结果显示,许多数学测试项目存在问题,因为它们显示出明显的偏差。研究还发现,澳大利亚学生比印尼学生表现更好,数学题也更容易。课程差异、解决数学问题的方法、教科书的可用性和教师的素质等因素可能解释国家之间存在DIF。这些发现表明,在比较各国学生的表现时,使用TIMSS存在严重的局限性。因此,在TIMSS 2007的结果能够有意义地用于研究之前,还需要进一步的经验证据。关键词:DIF题项,数学测试题项,Rasch模型
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differential Item Functioning: Item Level Analysis of TIMSS Mathematics Test Items Using Australian and Indonesian Database
The Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) aims to provide a broad perspective for evaluating and improving education. This assessment also ranks the participant countries based on their performance and makes inferences about factors affecting achievement and learning. However, the study may not function as it was expected because of differences in curricular, cultural, or language settings among countries. Consequently, this challenges assumptions about measurement equivalency. The present study aims to assess the equivalency of mathematics items on the TIMSS (2007) study across Australian and Indonesia. Students’ responses were subjected to Rasch analysis to determine DIF items. The results revealed that many items of mathematics tests are problematic because they showed significant bias. The study also found that Australian students performed better and found mathematics items on the test easier than their Indonesian counterparts did. Several factors such as curricular differences, methods used to solve mathematics problems, availability of textbooks and teachers’ quality might explain the existence of DIF between the countries. These findings indicate that serious limitations of using TIMSS results in comparing the performance of students across countries. Thus, further empirical evidence is needed before TIMSS 2007 results can be meaningfully used in research. Keywords: DIF items, mathematics test items, Rasch model
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Makara Hubs-Asia
Makara Hubs-Asia SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信