{"title":"当代文学批评现实主义辩论背景下的Kritische Blätter für Literatur und Kunst(1857-1858)期刊","authors":"Zuzana Urválková","doi":"10.5817/bl2019-2-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Kritische Blätter für Literatur und Kunst Journal (1857–1858) in the Context of the Contemporary Debates on Realism and the Shape of Literary Criticism This paper presents the age of literary criticism in German-language journals, as mapped out by Kritische Blätter für Literatur und Kunst (1857–1858), which was published in Prague and Leipzig by the Czech publisher Ignác Leopold Kober. The journal took part in the disputes that had taken place in the German literary criticism, concerning the form of Realism in art, and became a focal point where rationally defined, objective criticism was cultivated in the spirit of Enlightenment. While its editor, the German Eduard Schmidt-Weissenfels, in his articles presented a sort of an ideal Realism, which he further specified and favoured instead of the documentary, or „absolute“ Realism (the equivalent of which in today’s theory of literature would be Naturalism), the Czech Ignác Jan Hanuš promoted the critical evaluation of Slavic and Hungarian academic works in addition to those written in German. The Czech-German editorship with its supranational and panaustrian approach strived to create an organ of literary criticism to reflect the science and arts of the cultural space of Central Europe without the limitations of national standpoints. While Schmidt-Weissenfels pointed to Idealism and Romanticism in his programme of Ideal Realism, Hanuš and his collaborators (namely Julius Feifalík) pointed a critical mirror toward the Romantic tradition in Czech literary science by questioning the authenticity of the oldest literary monuments in Czech and the results of Czech literary science, using both the method of rational critihttps://doi.org/10.5817/BL2019-2-3 Zuzana Urválková Časopis Kritische Blätter für Literatur und Kunst (1857–1858) v kontextu soudobých literárněkritických debat bohemica litteraria 22 / 2019 / 2 s t u d ie >> 59 > cism and German science’s strict measures. Kritische Blätter für Literatur und Kunst (1857–1858) provided the impulse for the response of the Czech post-March criticism, as well – authors such as Jan Neruda and Karel Sabina started promoting Realism and defining its aesthetic framework.","PeriodicalId":34160,"journal":{"name":"Bohemica Litteraria","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Časopis Kritische Blätter für Literatur und Kunst (1857–1858) v kontextu soudobých literárněkritických debat o realismu\",\"authors\":\"Zuzana Urválková\",\"doi\":\"10.5817/bl2019-2-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Kritische Blätter für Literatur und Kunst Journal (1857–1858) in the Context of the Contemporary Debates on Realism and the Shape of Literary Criticism This paper presents the age of literary criticism in German-language journals, as mapped out by Kritische Blätter für Literatur und Kunst (1857–1858), which was published in Prague and Leipzig by the Czech publisher Ignác Leopold Kober. The journal took part in the disputes that had taken place in the German literary criticism, concerning the form of Realism in art, and became a focal point where rationally defined, objective criticism was cultivated in the spirit of Enlightenment. While its editor, the German Eduard Schmidt-Weissenfels, in his articles presented a sort of an ideal Realism, which he further specified and favoured instead of the documentary, or „absolute“ Realism (the equivalent of which in today’s theory of literature would be Naturalism), the Czech Ignác Jan Hanuš promoted the critical evaluation of Slavic and Hungarian academic works in addition to those written in German. The Czech-German editorship with its supranational and panaustrian approach strived to create an organ of literary criticism to reflect the science and arts of the cultural space of Central Europe without the limitations of national standpoints. While Schmidt-Weissenfels pointed to Idealism and Romanticism in his programme of Ideal Realism, Hanuš and his collaborators (namely Julius Feifalík) pointed a critical mirror toward the Romantic tradition in Czech literary science by questioning the authenticity of the oldest literary monuments in Czech and the results of Czech literary science, using both the method of rational critihttps://doi.org/10.5817/BL2019-2-3 Zuzana Urválková Časopis Kritische Blätter für Literatur und Kunst (1857–1858) v kontextu soudobých literárněkritických debat bohemica litteraria 22 / 2019 / 2 s t u d ie >> 59 > cism and German science’s strict measures. Kritische Blätter für Literatur und Kunst (1857–1858) provided the impulse for the response of the Czech post-March criticism, as well – authors such as Jan Neruda and Karel Sabina started promoting Realism and defining its aesthetic framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bohemica Litteraria\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bohemica Litteraria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5817/bl2019-2-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bohemica Litteraria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/bl2019-2-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文介绍了德语期刊中文学批评的时代,正如Kritische Blätter f r literature und Kunst(1857-1858)所描绘的那样,由捷克出版商Ignác Leopold Kober在布拉格和莱比锡出版。该杂志参与了德国文学批评中关于艺术中现实主义形式的争论,并成为启蒙精神中理性界定的客观批评的焦点。当它的编辑,德国人爱德华·施密特-魏森菲尔斯,在他的文章中提出了一种理想的现实主义,他进一步详细说明并青睐于纪录片或“绝对”现实主义(在今天的文学理论中相当于自然主义),捷克人Ignác扬·哈努斯提倡对斯拉夫和匈牙利学术作品的批判性评价,除了那些用德语写的作品。捷克-德国编辑以其超国家和泛奥地利的方式努力创造一个文学批评机构,以反映中欧文化空间的科学和艺术,而不受国家立场的限制。当Schmidt-Weissenfels在他的理想现实主义计划中指出理想主义和浪漫主义时,hanusi和他的合作者(即Julius Feifalík)通过质疑捷克最古老的文学纪念碑的真实性和捷克文学科学的结果,为捷克文学科学中的浪漫主义传统指出了一面批判的镜子,运用理性批判的方法https://doi.org/10.5817/BL2019-2-3 Zuzana Urválková Časopis Kritische Blätter f r literature und Kunst (1857-1858) v kontextu soudobých literárněkritických论辩波西米亚文学界22 / 2019 / 2 s - u - d - >> 59 > cism和德国科学的严格措施。Kritische Blätter f文学与艺术(1857-1858)为捷克后三月批评的回应提供了动力,也为Jan Neruda和Karel Sabina等作家开始推广现实主义并定义其美学框架。
Časopis Kritische Blätter für Literatur und Kunst (1857–1858) v kontextu soudobých literárněkritických debat o realismu
The Kritische Blätter für Literatur und Kunst Journal (1857–1858) in the Context of the Contemporary Debates on Realism and the Shape of Literary Criticism This paper presents the age of literary criticism in German-language journals, as mapped out by Kritische Blätter für Literatur und Kunst (1857–1858), which was published in Prague and Leipzig by the Czech publisher Ignác Leopold Kober. The journal took part in the disputes that had taken place in the German literary criticism, concerning the form of Realism in art, and became a focal point where rationally defined, objective criticism was cultivated in the spirit of Enlightenment. While its editor, the German Eduard Schmidt-Weissenfels, in his articles presented a sort of an ideal Realism, which he further specified and favoured instead of the documentary, or „absolute“ Realism (the equivalent of which in today’s theory of literature would be Naturalism), the Czech Ignác Jan Hanuš promoted the critical evaluation of Slavic and Hungarian academic works in addition to those written in German. The Czech-German editorship with its supranational and panaustrian approach strived to create an organ of literary criticism to reflect the science and arts of the cultural space of Central Europe without the limitations of national standpoints. While Schmidt-Weissenfels pointed to Idealism and Romanticism in his programme of Ideal Realism, Hanuš and his collaborators (namely Julius Feifalík) pointed a critical mirror toward the Romantic tradition in Czech literary science by questioning the authenticity of the oldest literary monuments in Czech and the results of Czech literary science, using both the method of rational critihttps://doi.org/10.5817/BL2019-2-3 Zuzana Urválková Časopis Kritische Blätter für Literatur und Kunst (1857–1858) v kontextu soudobých literárněkritických debat bohemica litteraria 22 / 2019 / 2 s t u d ie >> 59 > cism and German science’s strict measures. Kritische Blätter für Literatur und Kunst (1857–1858) provided the impulse for the response of the Czech post-March criticism, as well – authors such as Jan Neruda and Karel Sabina started promoting Realism and defining its aesthetic framework.