去除标签:台湾语疑问句与附加疑问句之区别

IF 0.3 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Taiwan Journal of Linguistics Pub Date : 2010-06-01 DOI:10.6519/TJL.2010.8(1).1

Seng-hian Lau

{"title":"去除标签:台湾语疑问句与附加疑问句之区别","authors":"Seng-hian Lau","doi":"10.6519/TJL.2010.8(1).1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper serves as an investigation into the differences between interrogative sentence-final particles (SFPs) and tag questions (tags) in Taiwanese. What we are concerned with is the discrepancies found among the lists of interrogative SFPs in the literature. To distinguish tags from the interrogative particles (PRTs), a testing procedure is devised based on the proposal for testing negative particles (NEG-PRTs) in Hsieh (2001). We conclude that buē, bē, bo, m, honn, (average)m, ma, nih are interrogative SFPs and hioo, m-me (me), sī-bo, sī-(average)m (sim) and sioh are tag questions. Among the interrogative SFPs, buē, bē, bo, and m are negative-particles which occur under IP, honn, (average)m, ma, and nih are particles which perch higher, under CP. We believe that distinguishing SFPs from tags is the foundation of a solid investigation into SFPs.","PeriodicalId":41000,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan Journal of Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Excising Tags: Distinguishing between Interrogative SFPs and Tag Questions in Taiwanese\",\"authors\":\"Seng-hian Lau\",\"doi\":\"10.6519/TJL.2010.8(1).1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper serves as an investigation into the differences between interrogative sentence-final particles (SFPs) and tag questions (tags) in Taiwanese. What we are concerned with is the discrepancies found among the lists of interrogative SFPs in the literature. To distinguish tags from the interrogative particles (PRTs), a testing procedure is devised based on the proposal for testing negative particles (NEG-PRTs) in Hsieh (2001). We conclude that buē, bē, bo, m, honn, (average)m, ma, nih are interrogative SFPs and hioo, m-me (me), sī-bo, sī-(average)m (sim) and sioh are tag questions. Among the interrogative SFPs, buē, bē, bo, and m are negative-particles which occur under IP, honn, (average)m, ma, and nih are particles which perch higher, under CP. We believe that distinguishing SFPs from tags is the foundation of a solid investigation into SFPs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Taiwan Journal of Linguistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Taiwan Journal of Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6519/TJL.2010.8(1).1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan Journal of Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6519/TJL.2010.8(1).1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

本文旨在探讨台湾语疑问句末助词与附加疑问句的差异。我们所关心的是在文献中疑问性SFPs列表中发现的差异。为了区分标签和疑问句粒子(prt)，基于Hsieh(2001)提出的测试阴性粒子(neg - prt)的建议，设计了一个测试程序。结果表明，buue、bue、bo、m、honn、(average)m、ma、nih为疑问句，hioo、m-me (me)、s -bo、s -(average)m (sim)和sioh为附加疑问句。在疑问句SFPs中，buu, bu, bo和m是IP下的负粒子，honn，(平均)m, ma和nih是CP下较高的粒子。我们认为区分SFPs和标签是对SFPs进行扎实研究的基础。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Excising Tags: Distinguishing between Interrogative SFPs and Tag Questions in Taiwanese

This paper serves as an investigation into the differences between interrogative sentence-final particles (SFPs) and tag questions (tags) in Taiwanese. What we are concerned with is the discrepancies found among the lists of interrogative SFPs in the literature. To distinguish tags from the interrogative particles (PRTs), a testing procedure is devised based on the proposal for testing negative particles (NEG-PRTs) in Hsieh (2001). We conclude that buē, bē, bo, m, honn, (average)m, ma, nih are interrogative SFPs and hioo, m-me (me), sī-bo, sī-(average)m (sim) and sioh are tag questions. Among the interrogative SFPs, buē, bē, bo, and m are negative-particles which occur under IP, honn, (average)m, ma, and nih are particles which perch higher, under CP. We believe that distinguishing SFPs from tags is the foundation of a solid investigation into SFPs.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Taiwan Journal of Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

20 weeks

期刊介绍： Taiwan Journal of Linguistics is an international journal dedicated to the publication of research papers in linguistics and welcomes contributions in all areas of the scientific study of language. Contributions may be submitted from all countries and are accepted all year round. The language of publication is English. There are no restrictions on regular submission; however, manuscripts simultaneously submitted to other publications cannot be accepted. TJL adheres to a strict standard of double-blind reviews to minimize biases that might be caused by knowledge of the author’s gender, culture, or standing within the professional community. Once a manuscript is determined as potentially suitable for the journal after an initial screening by the editor, all information that may identify the author is removed, and copies are sent to at least two qualified reviewers. The selection of reviewers is based purely on professional considerations and their identity will be kept strictly confidential by TJL. All feedback from the reviewers, except such comments as may be specifically referred to the attention of the editor, is faithfully relayed to the authors to assist them in improving their work, regardless of whether the paper is to be accepted, accepted upon minor revision, revised and resubmitted, or rejected.