追踪社会工作文献:通过引文分析探索与联合健康的联系

IF 0.2 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
C. Bakker
{"title":"追踪社会工作文献:通过引文分析探索与联合健康的联系","authors":"C. Bakker","doi":"10.6182/JLIS.2015.13(1).015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social work is a complex and multidisciplinary field drawing on a wide range of literature in terms of format, age, and discipline. Librarians in both collections and public services must be aware of this diversity in order to serve this rapidly growing field. This study was designed to identify core journals in the social work field, the most commonly cited formats and the age of citations, to assess the use of non-social work journals in the social work literature, and to draw comparisons to results in allied health and social science disciplines. The ultimate goal of this work is to provide librarians supporting social work programs with data which can contribute to their assessment of collections, both for maintenance and accreditation, and which can allow them to have a broader understanding of the field and a more effective approach to instruction. 28,269 citations from 567 source articles were examined. Journal articles were the most commonly cited format (69.90%), followed by books (17.69%). Over 91% of all citations came from materials published after 1990 and over 50% of citations came from materials published in the last ten years. Of the 2,520 journals cited, 32 top journals (1.27%) accounted for 6,612 (33.46%) of all citations to journals. Of those 32 journals, six were assigned to the field of social work. The remaining core journals came from the fields of psychology, public health, psychiatry, family and gender studies, pediatrics, and medicine. Format distribution and citation age were found to be similar to that of psychology, health care management, health education, and nurse practitioners. There was little similarity with the fields of addictions treatment and sociology. Practical implications for librarians are discussed.","PeriodicalId":40348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Library and Information Studies","volume":"13 1","pages":"15-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracing the Social Work Literature: Exploring Connections to Allied Health through Citation Analysis\",\"authors\":\"C. Bakker\",\"doi\":\"10.6182/JLIS.2015.13(1).015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social work is a complex and multidisciplinary field drawing on a wide range of literature in terms of format, age, and discipline. Librarians in both collections and public services must be aware of this diversity in order to serve this rapidly growing field. This study was designed to identify core journals in the social work field, the most commonly cited formats and the age of citations, to assess the use of non-social work journals in the social work literature, and to draw comparisons to results in allied health and social science disciplines. The ultimate goal of this work is to provide librarians supporting social work programs with data which can contribute to their assessment of collections, both for maintenance and accreditation, and which can allow them to have a broader understanding of the field and a more effective approach to instruction. 28,269 citations from 567 source articles were examined. Journal articles were the most commonly cited format (69.90%), followed by books (17.69%). Over 91% of all citations came from materials published after 1990 and over 50% of citations came from materials published in the last ten years. Of the 2,520 journals cited, 32 top journals (1.27%) accounted for 6,612 (33.46%) of all citations to journals. Of those 32 journals, six were assigned to the field of social work. The remaining core journals came from the fields of psychology, public health, psychiatry, family and gender studies, pediatrics, and medicine. Format distribution and citation age were found to be similar to that of psychology, health care management, health education, and nurse practitioners. There was little similarity with the fields of addictions treatment and sociology. Practical implications for librarians are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Library and Information Studies\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"15-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Library and Information Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6182/JLIS.2015.13(1).015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Library and Information Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6182/JLIS.2015.13(1).015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会工作是一个复杂的多学科领域,在格式、年龄和学科方面都有广泛的文献。藏书和公共服务领域的图书馆员必须意识到这种多样性,以便为这个迅速发展的领域服务。本研究旨在确定社会工作领域的核心期刊、最常被引用的格式和被引用的年龄,以评估社会工作文献中非社会工作期刊的使用情况,并与相关健康和社会科学学科的结果进行比较。这项工作的最终目标是为支持社会工作项目的图书馆员提供数据,这些数据可以帮助他们评估馆藏,包括维护和认证,并使他们对该领域有更广泛的了解,并提供更有效的指导方法。检查了来自567篇源文章的28,269次引用。期刊文章是最常被引用的格式(69.90%),其次是书籍(17.69%)。超过91%的引用来自1990年以后出版的材料,超过50%的引用来自最近十年出版的材料。在2520种被引期刊中,32种排名靠前的期刊(1.27%)占总被引期刊的6612种(33.46%)。在这32份期刊中,有6份是社会工作领域的。其余的核心期刊来自心理学、公共卫生、精神病学、家庭和性别研究、儿科和医学等领域。格式分布和被引年龄与心理学、卫生保健管理、健康教育和护理从业人员相似。这与成瘾治疗和社会学领域几乎没有相似之处。讨论了对图书馆员的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tracing the Social Work Literature: Exploring Connections to Allied Health through Citation Analysis
Social work is a complex and multidisciplinary field drawing on a wide range of literature in terms of format, age, and discipline. Librarians in both collections and public services must be aware of this diversity in order to serve this rapidly growing field. This study was designed to identify core journals in the social work field, the most commonly cited formats and the age of citations, to assess the use of non-social work journals in the social work literature, and to draw comparisons to results in allied health and social science disciplines. The ultimate goal of this work is to provide librarians supporting social work programs with data which can contribute to their assessment of collections, both for maintenance and accreditation, and which can allow them to have a broader understanding of the field and a more effective approach to instruction. 28,269 citations from 567 source articles were examined. Journal articles were the most commonly cited format (69.90%), followed by books (17.69%). Over 91% of all citations came from materials published after 1990 and over 50% of citations came from materials published in the last ten years. Of the 2,520 journals cited, 32 top journals (1.27%) accounted for 6,612 (33.46%) of all citations to journals. Of those 32 journals, six were assigned to the field of social work. The remaining core journals came from the fields of psychology, public health, psychiatry, family and gender studies, pediatrics, and medicine. Format distribution and citation age were found to be similar to that of psychology, health care management, health education, and nurse practitioners. There was little similarity with the fields of addictions treatment and sociology. Practical implications for librarians are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Library and Information Studies
Journal of Library and Information Studies INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信