{"title":"生命长，生命短;论历史语言学与类型学的关系","authors":"Pierluigi Cuzzolin","doi":"10.6092/LEF_22_P7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Latin, particularly in Early Latin, sentences occur provided with “gnomic” value such as, for instance: Ars longa, vita brevis. Combining typological data and recent results of the comparative method within Indo-European (mainly Vedic an Lithuanian), there is solid evidence that this syntactic type, which is only residual in Latin, was in fact one of the oldest strategies Indo-European has at its disposal to express comparison.","PeriodicalId":40434,"journal":{"name":"Linguistica e Filologia","volume":"22 1","pages":"7-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ars longa, vita brevis; or: On the relationship between historical linguistics and typology\",\"authors\":\"Pierluigi Cuzzolin\",\"doi\":\"10.6092/LEF_22_P7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Latin, particularly in Early Latin, sentences occur provided with “gnomic” value such as, for instance: Ars longa, vita brevis. Combining typological data and recent results of the comparative method within Indo-European (mainly Vedic an Lithuanian), there is solid evidence that this syntactic type, which is only residual in Latin, was in fact one of the oldest strategies Indo-European has at its disposal to express comparison.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistica e Filologia\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"7-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistica e Filologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6092/LEF_22_P7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistica e Filologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/LEF_22_P7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在拉丁语中，特别是在早期拉丁语中，句子出现时带有“语法”值，例如:Ars longa, vita brevis。结合印欧语(主要是吠陀语和立陶宛语)的类型数据和比较方法的最新结果，有确凿的证据表明，这种句法类型实际上是印欧语用来表达比较的最古老的策略之一，它只在拉丁语中存在。
Ars longa, vita brevis; or: On the relationship between historical linguistics and typology
In Latin, particularly in Early Latin, sentences occur provided with “gnomic” value such as, for instance: Ars longa, vita brevis. Combining typological data and recent results of the comparative method within Indo-European (mainly Vedic an Lithuanian), there is solid evidence that this syntactic type, which is only residual in Latin, was in fact one of the oldest strategies Indo-European has at its disposal to express comparison.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
