文体问题:当代英语法律起草手册和科学文体手册

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Christopher Williams, Elena Seoane
{"title":"文体问题:当代英语法律起草手册和科学文体手册","authors":"Christopher Williams, Elena Seoane","doi":"10.6092/LEF_22_P115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we examine the style manuals of two areas of contemporary specialized discourse, namely legal English (LE) and scientific English (SE). Our aim is first to identify the salient features of the manuals relating to their respective fields, and then to examine some of the major similarities and differences in the advice and suggestions provided by such manuals to legal drafters and to writers of scientific texts. By carrying out this task we hope to contribute to a clearer understanding of the rhetorical strategies which lie behind the production of texts in these respective fields, conditioning the ways in which such texts are written. In order to make comparisons possible it has been necessary to compile two small corpora of roughly equal size, one of legal drafting manuals, the other of scientific style manuals.","PeriodicalId":40434,"journal":{"name":"Linguistica e Filologia","volume":"22 1","pages":"115-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Questions of Style: Legal Drafting Manuals and Scientific Style Manuals in Contemporary English\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Williams, Elena Seoane\",\"doi\":\"10.6092/LEF_22_P115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we examine the style manuals of two areas of contemporary specialized discourse, namely legal English (LE) and scientific English (SE). Our aim is first to identify the salient features of the manuals relating to their respective fields, and then to examine some of the major similarities and differences in the advice and suggestions provided by such manuals to legal drafters and to writers of scientific texts. By carrying out this task we hope to contribute to a clearer understanding of the rhetorical strategies which lie behind the production of texts in these respective fields, conditioning the ways in which such texts are written. In order to make comparisons possible it has been necessary to compile two small corpora of roughly equal size, one of legal drafting manuals, the other of scientific style manuals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistica e Filologia\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"115-137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistica e Filologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6092/LEF_22_P115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistica e Filologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/LEF_22_P115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在本文中,我们研究了当代专业话语的两个领域,即法律英语(LE)和科技英语(SE)的风格手册。我们的目的首先是确定与各自领域相关的手册的显著特征,然后检查这些手册向法律起草者和科学文本作者提供的咨询意见和建议中的一些主要相似点和不同点。通过执行这项任务,我们希望有助于更清楚地理解这些各自领域文本生产背后的修辞策略,以及这些文本的写作方式。为了能够进行比较,有必要编写两本大小大致相等的小型语料库,一本是法律起草手册,另一本是科学风格手册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Questions of Style: Legal Drafting Manuals and Scientific Style Manuals in Contemporary English
In this paper we examine the style manuals of two areas of contemporary specialized discourse, namely legal English (LE) and scientific English (SE). Our aim is first to identify the salient features of the manuals relating to their respective fields, and then to examine some of the major similarities and differences in the advice and suggestions provided by such manuals to legal drafters and to writers of scientific texts. By carrying out this task we hope to contribute to a clearer understanding of the rhetorical strategies which lie behind the production of texts in these respective fields, conditioning the ways in which such texts are written. In order to make comparisons possible it has been necessary to compile two small corpora of roughly equal size, one of legal drafting manuals, the other of scientific style manuals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistica e Filologia
Linguistica e Filologia LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信