研究生学习困难量表(EDECS)的开发和验证过程:初步研究

Lian Boulet, France Landry, G. Goupil
{"title":"研究生学习困难量表(EDECS)的开发和验证过程:初步研究","authors":"Lian Boulet, France Landry, G. Goupil","doi":"10.7202/1090464ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many graduate students encounter challenges in their academic formation for which they consult university support services. The first aim of this study is to conduct a literature review of the main difficulties encountered. A classification of the latter, by content analysis, reveals nine categories. From this preliminary classification, a scale screening these difficulties, the EDECS, was constructed for graduate students support services. The exploratory factor analysis of the EDECS with 500 students grouped the nine initial categories of difficulties into four subscales, thus modifying the preliminary classification. The use of the test-retest method among 188 participants revealed good temporal stability. Various proofs of validity (content, internal structure and correlation between variables) were obtained. The conclusion offers suggestions for using the EDECS by student support services and discusses clinical considerations. Many graduate students encounter challenges in their academic formation for which they consult university support services. The first aim of this study is to conduct a literature review of the main difficulties encountered. A classification of the latter, by content analysis, reveals nine categories. From this preliminary classification, a scale screening these difficulties, the EDECS, was constructed for graduate students support services. The exploratory factor analysis of the EDECS with 500 students grouped the nine initial categories of difficulties into four subscales, thus modifying the preliminary classification. The use of the test-retest method among 188 participants revealed good temporal stability. Various proofs of validity (content, internal structure and correlation between variables) were obtained. The conclusion offers suggestions for using the EDECS by student support services and discusses clinical considerations.","PeriodicalId":90014,"journal":{"name":"Mesure et evaluation en education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Élaboration et processus de validation de l’Échelle d’évaluation des difficultés aux études de cycles supérieurs (EDECS) : étude préliminaire\",\"authors\":\"Lian Boulet, France Landry, G. Goupil\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1090464ar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many graduate students encounter challenges in their academic formation for which they consult university support services. The first aim of this study is to conduct a literature review of the main difficulties encountered. A classification of the latter, by content analysis, reveals nine categories. From this preliminary classification, a scale screening these difficulties, the EDECS, was constructed for graduate students support services. The exploratory factor analysis of the EDECS with 500 students grouped the nine initial categories of difficulties into four subscales, thus modifying the preliminary classification. The use of the test-retest method among 188 participants revealed good temporal stability. Various proofs of validity (content, internal structure and correlation between variables) were obtained. The conclusion offers suggestions for using the EDECS by student support services and discusses clinical considerations. Many graduate students encounter challenges in their academic formation for which they consult university support services. The first aim of this study is to conduct a literature review of the main difficulties encountered. A classification of the latter, by content analysis, reveals nine categories. From this preliminary classification, a scale screening these difficulties, the EDECS, was constructed for graduate students support services. The exploratory factor analysis of the EDECS with 500 students grouped the nine initial categories of difficulties into four subscales, thus modifying the preliminary classification. The use of the test-retest method among 188 participants revealed good temporal stability. Various proofs of validity (content, internal structure and correlation between variables) were obtained. The conclusion offers suggestions for using the EDECS by student support services and discusses clinical considerations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mesure et evaluation en education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mesure et evaluation en education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1090464ar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mesure et evaluation en education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1090464ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多研究生在他们的学术形成中遇到挑战,他们咨询大学的支持服务。本研究的第一个目的是对遇到的主要困难进行文献综述。通过内容分析,将后者分类为九类。根据这一初步分类,构建了一个筛选这些困难的量表,即EDECS,用于研究生支持服务。对500名学生的EDECS进行探索性因子分析,将最初的9类困难分为4个子量表,从而修正了初步分类。在188名参与者中使用测试-重测试方法显示出良好的时间稳定性。得到了各种效度证明(内容、内部结构和变量之间的相关性)。结论提出了学生支持服务使用EDECS的建议,并讨论了临床注意事项。许多研究生在他们的学术形成中遇到挑战,他们咨询大学的支持服务。本研究的第一个目的是对遇到的主要困难进行文献综述。通过内容分析,将后者分类为九类。根据这一初步分类,构建了一个筛选这些困难的量表,即EDECS,用于研究生支持服务。对500名学生的EDECS进行探索性因子分析,将最初的9类困难分为4个子量表,从而修正了初步分类。在188名参与者中使用测试-重测试方法显示出良好的时间稳定性。得到了各种效度证明(内容、内部结构和变量之间的相关性)。结论提出了学生支持服务使用EDECS的建议,并讨论了临床注意事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Élaboration et processus de validation de l’Échelle d’évaluation des difficultés aux études de cycles supérieurs (EDECS) : étude préliminaire
Many graduate students encounter challenges in their academic formation for which they consult university support services. The first aim of this study is to conduct a literature review of the main difficulties encountered. A classification of the latter, by content analysis, reveals nine categories. From this preliminary classification, a scale screening these difficulties, the EDECS, was constructed for graduate students support services. The exploratory factor analysis of the EDECS with 500 students grouped the nine initial categories of difficulties into four subscales, thus modifying the preliminary classification. The use of the test-retest method among 188 participants revealed good temporal stability. Various proofs of validity (content, internal structure and correlation between variables) were obtained. The conclusion offers suggestions for using the EDECS by student support services and discusses clinical considerations. Many graduate students encounter challenges in their academic formation for which they consult university support services. The first aim of this study is to conduct a literature review of the main difficulties encountered. A classification of the latter, by content analysis, reveals nine categories. From this preliminary classification, a scale screening these difficulties, the EDECS, was constructed for graduate students support services. The exploratory factor analysis of the EDECS with 500 students grouped the nine initial categories of difficulties into four subscales, thus modifying the preliminary classification. The use of the test-retest method among 188 participants revealed good temporal stability. Various proofs of validity (content, internal structure and correlation between variables) were obtained. The conclusion offers suggestions for using the EDECS by student support services and discusses clinical considerations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信