自由手势遥控机器人手术的比较研究

Tian Zhou, M. E. Cabrera, J. Wachs, Thomas Low, C. Sundaram
{"title":"自由手势遥控机器人手术的比较研究","authors":"Tian Zhou, M. E. Cabrera, J. Wachs, Thomas Low, C. Sundaram","doi":"10.5898/JHRI.5.2.Zhou","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research presents an exploratory study among touch-based and touchless interfaces selected to teleoperate a highly dexterous surgical robot. The possibility of incorporating touchless interfaces into the surgical arena may provide surgeons with the ability to engage in telerobotic surgery similarly as if they were operating with their bare hands. On the other hand, precision and sensibility may be lost. To explore the advantages and drawbacks of these modalities, five interfaces were selected to send navigational commands to the Taurus robot in the system: Omega, Hydra, and a keyboard. The first represented touch-based, while Leap Motion and Kinect were selected as touchless interfaces. Three experimental designs were selected to test the system, based on standardized surgically related tasks and clinically relevant performance metrics measured to evaluate the user's performance, learning rates, control stability, and interaction naturalness. The current work provides a benchmark and validation framework for the comparison of these two groups of interfaces and discusses their potential for current and future adoption in the surgical setting.","PeriodicalId":92076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of human-robot interaction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5898/JHRI.5.2.Zhou","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study for telerobotic surgery using free hand gestures\",\"authors\":\"Tian Zhou, M. E. Cabrera, J. Wachs, Thomas Low, C. Sundaram\",\"doi\":\"10.5898/JHRI.5.2.Zhou\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research presents an exploratory study among touch-based and touchless interfaces selected to teleoperate a highly dexterous surgical robot. The possibility of incorporating touchless interfaces into the surgical arena may provide surgeons with the ability to engage in telerobotic surgery similarly as if they were operating with their bare hands. On the other hand, precision and sensibility may be lost. To explore the advantages and drawbacks of these modalities, five interfaces were selected to send navigational commands to the Taurus robot in the system: Omega, Hydra, and a keyboard. The first represented touch-based, while Leap Motion and Kinect were selected as touchless interfaces. Three experimental designs were selected to test the system, based on standardized surgically related tasks and clinically relevant performance metrics measured to evaluate the user's performance, learning rates, control stability, and interaction naturalness. The current work provides a benchmark and validation framework for the comparison of these two groups of interfaces and discusses their potential for current and future adoption in the surgical setting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of human-robot interaction\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5898/JHRI.5.2.Zhou\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of human-robot interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.5.2.Zhou\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of human-robot interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.5.2.Zhou","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

本研究提出了一种探索性的研究,选择基于触摸和非触摸的接口来远程操作一个高度灵巧的手术机器人。将非接触式界面整合到外科领域的可能性,可能会为外科医生提供从事远程机器人手术的能力,就像他们徒手操作一样。另一方面,准确性和敏感性可能会丧失。为了探索这些模式的优缺点,选择了五个接口来向系统中的Taurus机器人发送导航命令:Omega, Hydra和键盘。前者代表触控界面,而Leap Motion和Kinect则被选为非触控界面。基于标准化的手术相关任务和临床相关的性能指标,选择了三个实验设计来测试系统,以评估用户的性能、学习率、控制稳定性和交互自然性。目前的工作为这两组接口的比较提供了一个基准和验证框架,并讨论了它们在当前和未来手术环境中采用的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study for telerobotic surgery using free hand gestures
This research presents an exploratory study among touch-based and touchless interfaces selected to teleoperate a highly dexterous surgical robot. The possibility of incorporating touchless interfaces into the surgical arena may provide surgeons with the ability to engage in telerobotic surgery similarly as if they were operating with their bare hands. On the other hand, precision and sensibility may be lost. To explore the advantages and drawbacks of these modalities, five interfaces were selected to send navigational commands to the Taurus robot in the system: Omega, Hydra, and a keyboard. The first represented touch-based, while Leap Motion and Kinect were selected as touchless interfaces. Three experimental designs were selected to test the system, based on standardized surgically related tasks and clinically relevant performance metrics measured to evaluate the user's performance, learning rates, control stability, and interaction naturalness. The current work provides a benchmark and validation framework for the comparison of these two groups of interfaces and discusses their potential for current and future adoption in the surgical setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信