Bárbara Monteiro, Maristela Candida, Suzana Monteiro, F. Paes, T. Yuan, Ang Li, Xin Sun, N. Rocha, Carlos Campos, A. Nardi, S. Machado
{"title":"失眠症成人的工作记忆功能障碍:一项系统的元分析综述","authors":"Bárbara Monteiro, Maristela Candida, Suzana Monteiro, F. Paes, T. Yuan, Ang Li, Xin Sun, N. Rocha, Carlos Campos, A. Nardi, S. Machado","doi":"10.5935/MEDICALEXPRESS.2016.02.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Insomnia is the most commonly occurring sleep disorder: recent reports estimate that 25-30% of adults in the general population occasional instances of experience insomnia, while 10% suffer from disturbances severe enough to meet diagnostic criteria for insomnia. Little is known about the mechanisms, causes, clinical course, and consequences of this condition. Over 30 studies have been published on the matter but only a small proportion has found differences in the working memory of individuals with vs. without insomnia. OBJECTIVE: To summarize evidence regarding the differences in working memory performance between insomniac vs. normal adult sleepers. METHODS: The survey was conducted using an advanced search in the ISI Web of Science and MEDLINE/PubMed with the terms \"sleep\", \"insomnia\" and \"working memory\" as major descriptors; these were crossed with the following keywords: \"psychological tests\", \"neuropsychology\" and \"performance\". RESULTS: A total of 112 articles were identified in the search conducted in PubMed and Web of Science. After the screening, 102 articles unrelated to the proposed theme were excluded. Thus, 10 articles were analyzed by the eligibility and exclusion criteria, and included in this systematic review. CONCLUSION: The information resulting from the analysis of the reviewed articles suggests that mild, but not definitive deficits in cognitive performance might be masked by insignificant disparities in studies comparing insomniac individuals with normal sleepers. This shortcoming can be circumvented by larger and better-characterized samples, together with optimized methodological control of factors which might otherwise result in confounding variations among participants.","PeriodicalId":31471,"journal":{"name":"Medical Express","volume":"3 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Working memory dysfunction in insomniac adults: a systematic metanalytical review\",\"authors\":\"Bárbara Monteiro, Maristela Candida, Suzana Monteiro, F. Paes, T. Yuan, Ang Li, Xin Sun, N. Rocha, Carlos Campos, A. Nardi, S. Machado\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/MEDICALEXPRESS.2016.02.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Insomnia is the most commonly occurring sleep disorder: recent reports estimate that 25-30% of adults in the general population occasional instances of experience insomnia, while 10% suffer from disturbances severe enough to meet diagnostic criteria for insomnia. Little is known about the mechanisms, causes, clinical course, and consequences of this condition. Over 30 studies have been published on the matter but only a small proportion has found differences in the working memory of individuals with vs. without insomnia. OBJECTIVE: To summarize evidence regarding the differences in working memory performance between insomniac vs. normal adult sleepers. METHODS: The survey was conducted using an advanced search in the ISI Web of Science and MEDLINE/PubMed with the terms \\\"sleep\\\", \\\"insomnia\\\" and \\\"working memory\\\" as major descriptors; these were crossed with the following keywords: \\\"psychological tests\\\", \\\"neuropsychology\\\" and \\\"performance\\\". RESULTS: A total of 112 articles were identified in the search conducted in PubMed and Web of Science. After the screening, 102 articles unrelated to the proposed theme were excluded. Thus, 10 articles were analyzed by the eligibility and exclusion criteria, and included in this systematic review. CONCLUSION: The information resulting from the analysis of the reviewed articles suggests that mild, but not definitive deficits in cognitive performance might be masked by insignificant disparities in studies comparing insomniac individuals with normal sleepers. This shortcoming can be circumvented by larger and better-characterized samples, together with optimized methodological control of factors which might otherwise result in confounding variations among participants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Express\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Express\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/MEDICALEXPRESS.2016.02.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/MEDICALEXPRESS.2016.02.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
背景:失眠是最常见的睡眠障碍:最近的报告估计,普通人群中25-30%的成年人偶尔经历失眠,而10%的人患有严重到足以满足失眠诊断标准的障碍。对这种情况的机制、原因、临床过程和后果知之甚少。关于这个问题已经发表了30多项研究,但只有一小部分发现了失眠患者和非失眠症患者在工作记忆方面的差异。目的:总结失眠症患者与正常成人睡眠者工作记忆表现差异的证据。方法:以“睡眠”、“失眠”和“工作记忆”为主要描述词,在ISI Web of Science和MEDLINE/PubMed中进行高级搜索;这些与以下关键词交叉:“心理测试”、“神经心理学”和“表现”。结果:在PubMed和Web of Science中共检索到112篇文章。经筛选,排除了102篇与拟议主题无关的文章。因此,根据入选标准和排除标准对10篇文章进行了分析,并纳入本系统评价。结论:从文献分析中得出的信息表明,在比较失眠症患者和正常睡眠者的研究中,轻度但不是决定性的认知表现缺陷可能被微不足道的差异所掩盖。这一缺点可以通过更大、更有特征的样本,以及对可能导致参与者之间混杂变化的因素进行优化的方法学控制来克服。
Working memory dysfunction in insomniac adults: a systematic metanalytical review
BACKGROUND: Insomnia is the most commonly occurring sleep disorder: recent reports estimate that 25-30% of adults in the general population occasional instances of experience insomnia, while 10% suffer from disturbances severe enough to meet diagnostic criteria for insomnia. Little is known about the mechanisms, causes, clinical course, and consequences of this condition. Over 30 studies have been published on the matter but only a small proportion has found differences in the working memory of individuals with vs. without insomnia. OBJECTIVE: To summarize evidence regarding the differences in working memory performance between insomniac vs. normal adult sleepers. METHODS: The survey was conducted using an advanced search in the ISI Web of Science and MEDLINE/PubMed with the terms "sleep", "insomnia" and "working memory" as major descriptors; these were crossed with the following keywords: "psychological tests", "neuropsychology" and "performance". RESULTS: A total of 112 articles were identified in the search conducted in PubMed and Web of Science. After the screening, 102 articles unrelated to the proposed theme were excluded. Thus, 10 articles were analyzed by the eligibility and exclusion criteria, and included in this systematic review. CONCLUSION: The information resulting from the analysis of the reviewed articles suggests that mild, but not definitive deficits in cognitive performance might be masked by insignificant disparities in studies comparing insomniac individuals with normal sleepers. This shortcoming can be circumvented by larger and better-characterized samples, together with optimized methodological control of factors which might otherwise result in confounding variations among participants.