革命的夏天:美国独立的诞生

Stephen Donnelly
{"title":"革命的夏天:美国独立的诞生","authors":"Stephen Donnelly","doi":"10.5860/choice.51-2834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Revolutionary Summer: The Birth of American Independence. Joseph J. Ellis. New York: Vintage Books, 2013. 265 pages. $15.95 (paperback).Revolutionary Summer presents us with the crescendo moment of American history: the months of May through October 1776 in all their confusion, uncertainty, defeat, and courage. A more conventional treatment of 1776 would include the stirring climax of the battles of Trenton and Princeton, New Jersey. Instead, this book chooses to focus on the problems surmounted and lessons learned that would eventually lead to the outcome that now seems preordained, but was far from certain at the time. In some ways, it's like a book about the Pacific War before the battle of Midway, focusing on the lessons of the holding actions and defeats rather than on the eventual glorious comeback.This book often focuses on the actions and interactions of two of the prime movers of the time: statesman and polemicist John Adams, and General George Washington. Each in his own way and in his own arena was arguably the central figure of the drama. Independence probably would have occurred without them, but at a far different pace and possibly in an altered form.The earlier action at Bunker Hill had infused the colonists with an inflated sense of the relative merits of militiamen to professional soldiers. It wasn't until the Battles of New Orleans and Fredericksburg in later wars that generals finally learned the folly of a frontal attack on entrenched positions supported by artillery. Consequently, the colonists were apt to attribute their near success against daunting odds as proof of the superiority of their fighting spirit rather than as proof of their defensive position. This is hindsight, however; and this early battle success, combined with the forced British evacuation of Boston, contributed to a feeling of overconfidence that was soon to be dissipated. Washington considered making New York into one giant version of Bunker Hill, without fully realizing that the scope of the area made the project impossible. Defense works only when it can't be flanked.The growth of Washington as a person and as a commander is a central theme of the book. Washington's obsolescent sense of personal honor, where a leader's sensibilities can have profound affects upon his army and possibly even his country, almost led to disaster in a number of precarious situations. This code of honor was learned at birth in the home of every Virginia planter and was reinforced by Washington's early exposure to British military tradition during his battle experiences in the French and Indian War. …","PeriodicalId":81429,"journal":{"name":"Historical journal of Massachusetts","volume":"43 1","pages":"159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revolutionary Summer: The Birth of American Independence\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Donnelly\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.51-2834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Revolutionary Summer: The Birth of American Independence. Joseph J. Ellis. New York: Vintage Books, 2013. 265 pages. $15.95 (paperback).Revolutionary Summer presents us with the crescendo moment of American history: the months of May through October 1776 in all their confusion, uncertainty, defeat, and courage. A more conventional treatment of 1776 would include the stirring climax of the battles of Trenton and Princeton, New Jersey. Instead, this book chooses to focus on the problems surmounted and lessons learned that would eventually lead to the outcome that now seems preordained, but was far from certain at the time. In some ways, it's like a book about the Pacific War before the battle of Midway, focusing on the lessons of the holding actions and defeats rather than on the eventual glorious comeback.This book often focuses on the actions and interactions of two of the prime movers of the time: statesman and polemicist John Adams, and General George Washington. Each in his own way and in his own arena was arguably the central figure of the drama. Independence probably would have occurred without them, but at a far different pace and possibly in an altered form.The earlier action at Bunker Hill had infused the colonists with an inflated sense of the relative merits of militiamen to professional soldiers. It wasn't until the Battles of New Orleans and Fredericksburg in later wars that generals finally learned the folly of a frontal attack on entrenched positions supported by artillery. Consequently, the colonists were apt to attribute their near success against daunting odds as proof of the superiority of their fighting spirit rather than as proof of their defensive position. This is hindsight, however; and this early battle success, combined with the forced British evacuation of Boston, contributed to a feeling of overconfidence that was soon to be dissipated. Washington considered making New York into one giant version of Bunker Hill, without fully realizing that the scope of the area made the project impossible. Defense works only when it can't be flanked.The growth of Washington as a person and as a commander is a central theme of the book. Washington's obsolescent sense of personal honor, where a leader's sensibilities can have profound affects upon his army and possibly even his country, almost led to disaster in a number of precarious situations. This code of honor was learned at birth in the home of every Virginia planter and was reinforced by Washington's early exposure to British military tradition during his battle experiences in the French and Indian War. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":81429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historical journal of Massachusetts\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historical journal of Massachusetts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-2834\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical journal of Massachusetts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-2834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

革命的夏天:美国独立的诞生。约瑟夫·j·埃利斯。纽约:Vintage Books, 2013。265页。15.95美元(平装)。革命之夏向我们展示了美国历史上的高潮时刻:1776年5月到10月,充满了混乱、不确定、失败和勇气。对1776年更传统的描述应该包括特伦顿战役和新泽西州普林斯顿战役中激动人心的高潮。相反,这本书选择把重点放在克服的问题和吸取的教训上,这些问题和教训最终会导致现在看来是注定的结果,但在当时远非确定。在某些方面,它就像一本关于中途岛战役前太平洋战争的书,关注的是守备行动和失败的教训,而不是最终的辉煌反击。这本书经常关注当时两位主要推动者的行动和互动:政治家和辩论家约翰·亚当斯和乔治·华盛顿将军。每个人都以自己的方式在自己的舞台上可以说是戏剧的中心人物。如果没有他们,独立可能会发生,但速度和形式可能会大不相同。早些时候在邦克山的行动使殖民者产生了一种夸大的感觉,认为民兵相对于职业士兵更有价值。直到后来的新奥尔良战役和弗雷德里克斯堡战役,将军们才终于明白了在炮兵支援下对固守阵地进行正面攻击的愚蠢之处。因此,殖民者倾向于把他们在险象临头的情况下取得的胜利,视为他们战斗精神的优越性,而不是他们处于防御地位的证明。然而,这是事后诸葛亮;这场早期战役的胜利,加上英国人被迫撤离波士顿,导致了一种过度自信的感觉,这种感觉很快就消散了。华盛顿曾考虑把纽约变成一个巨型版的邦克山(Bunker Hill),但没有充分意识到,这个地区的规模使这个项目不可能实现。防御只有在不能被夹击时才有效。华盛顿作为一个人和一名指挥官的成长是这本书的中心主题。华盛顿早已过时的个人荣誉感——一个领导人的感知力可以对他的军队甚至国家产生深远的影响——在许多危险的情况下几乎导致了灾难。这一荣誉准则在弗吉尼亚州的每个种植园主出生时就学会了,而华盛顿在法国和印度战争中的战斗经历使他早期接触到英国的军事传统,从而加强了这一准则。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revolutionary Summer: The Birth of American Independence
Revolutionary Summer: The Birth of American Independence. Joseph J. Ellis. New York: Vintage Books, 2013. 265 pages. $15.95 (paperback).Revolutionary Summer presents us with the crescendo moment of American history: the months of May through October 1776 in all their confusion, uncertainty, defeat, and courage. A more conventional treatment of 1776 would include the stirring climax of the battles of Trenton and Princeton, New Jersey. Instead, this book chooses to focus on the problems surmounted and lessons learned that would eventually lead to the outcome that now seems preordained, but was far from certain at the time. In some ways, it's like a book about the Pacific War before the battle of Midway, focusing on the lessons of the holding actions and defeats rather than on the eventual glorious comeback.This book often focuses on the actions and interactions of two of the prime movers of the time: statesman and polemicist John Adams, and General George Washington. Each in his own way and in his own arena was arguably the central figure of the drama. Independence probably would have occurred without them, but at a far different pace and possibly in an altered form.The earlier action at Bunker Hill had infused the colonists with an inflated sense of the relative merits of militiamen to professional soldiers. It wasn't until the Battles of New Orleans and Fredericksburg in later wars that generals finally learned the folly of a frontal attack on entrenched positions supported by artillery. Consequently, the colonists were apt to attribute their near success against daunting odds as proof of the superiority of their fighting spirit rather than as proof of their defensive position. This is hindsight, however; and this early battle success, combined with the forced British evacuation of Boston, contributed to a feeling of overconfidence that was soon to be dissipated. Washington considered making New York into one giant version of Bunker Hill, without fully realizing that the scope of the area made the project impossible. Defense works only when it can't be flanked.The growth of Washington as a person and as a commander is a central theme of the book. Washington's obsolescent sense of personal honor, where a leader's sensibilities can have profound affects upon his army and possibly even his country, almost led to disaster in a number of precarious situations. This code of honor was learned at birth in the home of every Virginia planter and was reinforced by Washington's early exposure to British military tradition during his battle experiences in the French and Indian War. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信