{"title":"新贝德福德内战","authors":"J. Pittenger","doi":"10.5860/choice.50-2270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New Bedford's Civil War. Earl F. Mulderink III. New York, NY: Fordham University Press, 2012. 306 pages. $55.00 (hardcover).New Bedford, Massachusetts was considered to be the \"richest city in America\" in the decades before the Civil War by contemporary observers, as well as one of the most socially progressive. Merchants rich from the oil of the sperm whale walked the same streets as scores of freed slaves from the American South in what was surely one of the most diverse cities in America. Racial attitudes among residents of the town, though hardly ideal, were leaps and bounds beyond much of the rest of the country, and competition for economic opportunity was relatively just. However, the events of the Civil War would create significant repercussions for the city, and postbellum New Bedford would struggle to recapture the economic bounty that had graced the city in the years before the war ripped the country apart.Earl F. Mulderink, III has written an ambitious volume that carefully utilizes an impressive array of primary and secondary source material, backed by a wealth of quantitative data that renders the work a true social history. Mulderink's work is ambitious, as he seeks to analyze the economic, social, and political consequences that the Civil War field for New Bedford. His work is primarily focused on the repercussions that the war held for the social fabric of the city itself, and as such, those seeking an in-depth military history should look elsewhere. Mulderink does incorporate the history of the conflict indirectly throughout his work, namely through examination of recruitment efforts of white and black troops within the city, but his interest in the war is chiefly focused on the experiences of the city's African-American soldiers.The African-American experience in New Bedford is one of Mulderink's main areas of focus, and he ably backs his argument that while the city offered something of a haven to free blacks, economic opportunities for AfricanAmericans were hardly ideal, especially given competition with immigrants. However, Mulderink notes that New Bedford did have a larger percentage of black artisans than any other northern city, so chances for gainful, skilled employment did indeed exist for African-Americans. Furthermore, he vividly describes the abolitionist fervor that gripped much of Massachusetts in the decades leading up to the war, with free blacks in New Bedford playing a key role. African-Americans in the antebellum years were respected members of the larger population of the city who simultaneously built their own independent community comprised of powerful social ties.Once the war began and African-Americans were finally permitted to enlist in 1863, free black men of New Bedford proudly enlisted by the dozen in racially segregated units, including the Fifty-Fourth Massachusetts regiment. Undoubtedly the most famous regiment of African-American troops from the war, especially after its immortalization by Hollywood in 1989's Glory, the unit would cover itself in glory during its years of service. Its bestknown enlisted man was New Bedford's own Sergeant William H. Carney, who despite grievous wounds at Fort Wagner in 1863, never allowed the American flag that he was carrying to touch the ground. For his valor, Carney was awarded the Medal of Honor, but his post-war role would be indicative of the nation's problems with the racial legacy of the war.Mulderink utilizes the work of David Blight to build the framework for his analysis of New Bedford's post-war racial politics. Blight contends that white veterans from both sides managed to agree on a reconciliationist memory of the war that focused on their mutual heroism, rather than acknowledging the true emancipationist memory of the conflict, which had the additional side effect of marginalizing black veterans. …","PeriodicalId":81429,"journal":{"name":"Historical journal of Massachusetts","volume":"43 1","pages":"151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Bedford's Civil War\",\"authors\":\"J. Pittenger\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.50-2270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"New Bedford's Civil War. Earl F. Mulderink III. New York, NY: Fordham University Press, 2012. 306 pages. $55.00 (hardcover).New Bedford, Massachusetts was considered to be the \\\"richest city in America\\\" in the decades before the Civil War by contemporary observers, as well as one of the most socially progressive. Merchants rich from the oil of the sperm whale walked the same streets as scores of freed slaves from the American South in what was surely one of the most diverse cities in America. Racial attitudes among residents of the town, though hardly ideal, were leaps and bounds beyond much of the rest of the country, and competition for economic opportunity was relatively just. However, the events of the Civil War would create significant repercussions for the city, and postbellum New Bedford would struggle to recapture the economic bounty that had graced the city in the years before the war ripped the country apart.Earl F. Mulderink, III has written an ambitious volume that carefully utilizes an impressive array of primary and secondary source material, backed by a wealth of quantitative data that renders the work a true social history. Mulderink's work is ambitious, as he seeks to analyze the economic, social, and political consequences that the Civil War field for New Bedford. His work is primarily focused on the repercussions that the war held for the social fabric of the city itself, and as such, those seeking an in-depth military history should look elsewhere. Mulderink does incorporate the history of the conflict indirectly throughout his work, namely through examination of recruitment efforts of white and black troops within the city, but his interest in the war is chiefly focused on the experiences of the city's African-American soldiers.The African-American experience in New Bedford is one of Mulderink's main areas of focus, and he ably backs his argument that while the city offered something of a haven to free blacks, economic opportunities for AfricanAmericans were hardly ideal, especially given competition with immigrants. However, Mulderink notes that New Bedford did have a larger percentage of black artisans than any other northern city, so chances for gainful, skilled employment did indeed exist for African-Americans. Furthermore, he vividly describes the abolitionist fervor that gripped much of Massachusetts in the decades leading up to the war, with free blacks in New Bedford playing a key role. African-Americans in the antebellum years were respected members of the larger population of the city who simultaneously built their own independent community comprised of powerful social ties.Once the war began and African-Americans were finally permitted to enlist in 1863, free black men of New Bedford proudly enlisted by the dozen in racially segregated units, including the Fifty-Fourth Massachusetts regiment. Undoubtedly the most famous regiment of African-American troops from the war, especially after its immortalization by Hollywood in 1989's Glory, the unit would cover itself in glory during its years of service. Its bestknown enlisted man was New Bedford's own Sergeant William H. Carney, who despite grievous wounds at Fort Wagner in 1863, never allowed the American flag that he was carrying to touch the ground. For his valor, Carney was awarded the Medal of Honor, but his post-war role would be indicative of the nation's problems with the racial legacy of the war.Mulderink utilizes the work of David Blight to build the framework for his analysis of New Bedford's post-war racial politics. Blight contends that white veterans from both sides managed to agree on a reconciliationist memory of the war that focused on their mutual heroism, rather than acknowledging the true emancipationist memory of the conflict, which had the additional side effect of marginalizing black veterans. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":81429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historical journal of Massachusetts\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historical journal of Massachusetts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.50-2270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical journal of Massachusetts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.50-2270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
新贝德福德内战。伯爵F.穆德林克三世纽约:福特汉姆大学出版社,2012。306页。55.00美元(精装)。马萨诸塞州的新贝德福德被同时代的观察家认为是内战前几十年“美国最富有的城市”,也是社会最进步的城市之一。在美国最多样化的城市之一,从抹香鲸油中发财的商人和许多从美国南部解放出来的奴隶走在同一条街上。该镇居民的种族态度虽然很难说是理想的,但却比全国其他许多地方都有了长足的进步,对经济机会的竞争也相对公正。然而,内战的事件给这座城市带来了巨大的影响,战后的新贝德福德将努力重新获得在战争撕裂这个国家之前的几年里给这座城市带来的经济恩惠。马尔德里克三世(Earl F. Mulderink, III)写了一本雄心勃勃的书,精心利用了一系列令人印象深刻的一手和二手资料,并辅以丰富的定量数据,使这本书成为一部真正的社会历史。穆德林克的作品雄心勃勃,他试图分析内战对新贝德福德的经济、社会和政治影响。他的作品主要关注战争对城市社会结构的影响,因此,那些寻求深入军事史的人应该去别处看看。Mulderink确实在他的作品中间接地融入了冲突的历史,即通过对城市中白人和黑人军队招募工作的检查,但他对战争的兴趣主要集中在城市非裔美国士兵的经历上。非裔美国人在新贝德福德的经历是穆德林克关注的主要领域之一,他巧妙地支持了自己的观点,即尽管这座城市为自由黑人提供了某种避风港,但非裔美国人的经济机会并不理想,尤其是考虑到与移民的竞争。然而,穆德林克指出,新贝德福德的黑人工匠比例确实比任何其他北方城市都要高,因此,非洲裔美国人确实有机会获得高薪、熟练的工作。此外,他生动地描述了在战争爆发前的几十年里,废奴主义的狂热笼罩着马萨诸塞州的大部分地区,新贝德福德的自由黑人发挥了关键作用。非裔美国人在南北战争前是受人尊敬的城市人口,他们同时建立了自己的独立社区,包括强大的社会关系。战争一开始,非裔美国人终于在1863年被允许入伍,新贝德福德的十几名自由黑人自豪地加入了种族隔离的部队,包括马萨诸塞州第五十四团。毫无疑问,这是二战中最著名的非裔美国人部队,尤其是在1989年的好莱坞电影《光荣》(Glory)使其名垂青史之后,这支部队在服役的岁月里充满了荣耀。它最著名的士兵是新贝德福德自己的中士威廉·h·卡尼(William H. Carney),尽管他1863年在瓦格纳堡(Fort Wagner)受了重伤,但他从未让自己手持的美国国旗碰触地面。由于他的英勇,卡尼被授予荣誉勋章,但他在战后扮演的角色表明了美国在战争遗留下来的种族问题。Mulderink利用David Blight的工作为他对新贝德福德战后种族政治的分析构建了框架。布莱特认为,双方的白人退伍军人对战争的记忆都是和解主义的,集中在他们双方的英雄主义上,而不是承认对冲突的真正解放主义记忆,这有一个额外的副作用,那就是把黑人退伍军人边缘化。…
New Bedford's Civil War. Earl F. Mulderink III. New York, NY: Fordham University Press, 2012. 306 pages. $55.00 (hardcover).New Bedford, Massachusetts was considered to be the "richest city in America" in the decades before the Civil War by contemporary observers, as well as one of the most socially progressive. Merchants rich from the oil of the sperm whale walked the same streets as scores of freed slaves from the American South in what was surely one of the most diverse cities in America. Racial attitudes among residents of the town, though hardly ideal, were leaps and bounds beyond much of the rest of the country, and competition for economic opportunity was relatively just. However, the events of the Civil War would create significant repercussions for the city, and postbellum New Bedford would struggle to recapture the economic bounty that had graced the city in the years before the war ripped the country apart.Earl F. Mulderink, III has written an ambitious volume that carefully utilizes an impressive array of primary and secondary source material, backed by a wealth of quantitative data that renders the work a true social history. Mulderink's work is ambitious, as he seeks to analyze the economic, social, and political consequences that the Civil War field for New Bedford. His work is primarily focused on the repercussions that the war held for the social fabric of the city itself, and as such, those seeking an in-depth military history should look elsewhere. Mulderink does incorporate the history of the conflict indirectly throughout his work, namely through examination of recruitment efforts of white and black troops within the city, but his interest in the war is chiefly focused on the experiences of the city's African-American soldiers.The African-American experience in New Bedford is one of Mulderink's main areas of focus, and he ably backs his argument that while the city offered something of a haven to free blacks, economic opportunities for AfricanAmericans were hardly ideal, especially given competition with immigrants. However, Mulderink notes that New Bedford did have a larger percentage of black artisans than any other northern city, so chances for gainful, skilled employment did indeed exist for African-Americans. Furthermore, he vividly describes the abolitionist fervor that gripped much of Massachusetts in the decades leading up to the war, with free blacks in New Bedford playing a key role. African-Americans in the antebellum years were respected members of the larger population of the city who simultaneously built their own independent community comprised of powerful social ties.Once the war began and African-Americans were finally permitted to enlist in 1863, free black men of New Bedford proudly enlisted by the dozen in racially segregated units, including the Fifty-Fourth Massachusetts regiment. Undoubtedly the most famous regiment of African-American troops from the war, especially after its immortalization by Hollywood in 1989's Glory, the unit would cover itself in glory during its years of service. Its bestknown enlisted man was New Bedford's own Sergeant William H. Carney, who despite grievous wounds at Fort Wagner in 1863, never allowed the American flag that he was carrying to touch the ground. For his valor, Carney was awarded the Medal of Honor, but his post-war role would be indicative of the nation's problems with the racial legacy of the war.Mulderink utilizes the work of David Blight to build the framework for his analysis of New Bedford's post-war racial politics. Blight contends that white veterans from both sides managed to agree on a reconciliationist memory of the war that focused on their mutual heroism, rather than acknowledging the true emancipationist memory of the conflict, which had the additional side effect of marginalizing black veterans. …