变化的狂喜:艾米莉·狄金森的诗歌发展

G. Guercio
{"title":"变化的狂喜:艾米莉·狄金森的诗歌发展","authors":"G. Guercio","doi":"10.5860/choice.45-4217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Changing Rapture: Emily Dickinson's Poetic Development. By Aliki Bamstone. Hanover and London: University Press of New England, 2006. 208 pages. $45.00 (hardcover). Critics have traditionally viewed Emily Dickinson as a poet whose work remained stagnant but was read because of its intrigue and possible hidden meaning. Aliki Barnstone's published doctoral dissertation Changing Rapture: Emily Dickinson 's Poetic Development argues that Dickinson's work developed in a very complex three-phase progress. Dickinson's poetic development, or rapture, as Barnstone terms it, is marked by a struggle against Calvinism and her involvement with Transcendentalism. Barnstone, a Professor of English at the University of Missouri, describes Dickinson's three-step development as follows: the use of satire to critique Calvinism and Sentimentalism; a 'self-conversion' or intellectual crisis where she mastered Calvinist theology; and a struggle with Calvinism and selfinhalation to a re-evaluation of Ralph Waldo Emerson's selfhood and self-reliance. Barnstone's study carries a Massachusetts tenor, given that it questions the very basis of American culture from its Puritan origins to the late nineteenth century by challenging and reworking philosophies of American culture that originated in Massachusetts. Barnstone describes the first phase of Emily Dickinson's development as a satirical criticism against Calvinism and Sentimentalism. Dickinson's stance was largely grounded in the dual premise that either rejected women or depicted women as passive. Through Calvinism Dickinson believed that women functioned \"within the discourse of man, a signifier that has always referred back to its opposite signifier which annihilates its specific energy and diminishes or stifles its very different sound\" (39). If women were to create their own voice they would have to \"turn it around, and seize it; ... make it theirs . . . bite that tongue with her very own teeth to invent for herself a language to get outside of' (39). Dickinson, in turn, suggested that women create their own language and form of expression, one based on a poetic technique whose meaning lies primarily hidden in narrative gaps. Sentimentalism - because of its overtness - depicted women as passive, in Dickinson's estimation. The second phase of Dickinson's development was marked by an intellectual crisis wherein she mastered Calvinist theology. Throughout her second phase Dickinson maintained a radical shift from traditional orthodox views to heterodox ones. …","PeriodicalId":81429,"journal":{"name":"Historical journal of Massachusetts","volume":"37 1","pages":"151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changing Rapture: Emily Dickinson's Poetic Development\",\"authors\":\"G. Guercio\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.45-4217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Changing Rapture: Emily Dickinson's Poetic Development. By Aliki Bamstone. Hanover and London: University Press of New England, 2006. 208 pages. $45.00 (hardcover). Critics have traditionally viewed Emily Dickinson as a poet whose work remained stagnant but was read because of its intrigue and possible hidden meaning. Aliki Barnstone's published doctoral dissertation Changing Rapture: Emily Dickinson 's Poetic Development argues that Dickinson's work developed in a very complex three-phase progress. Dickinson's poetic development, or rapture, as Barnstone terms it, is marked by a struggle against Calvinism and her involvement with Transcendentalism. Barnstone, a Professor of English at the University of Missouri, describes Dickinson's three-step development as follows: the use of satire to critique Calvinism and Sentimentalism; a 'self-conversion' or intellectual crisis where she mastered Calvinist theology; and a struggle with Calvinism and selfinhalation to a re-evaluation of Ralph Waldo Emerson's selfhood and self-reliance. Barnstone's study carries a Massachusetts tenor, given that it questions the very basis of American culture from its Puritan origins to the late nineteenth century by challenging and reworking philosophies of American culture that originated in Massachusetts. Barnstone describes the first phase of Emily Dickinson's development as a satirical criticism against Calvinism and Sentimentalism. Dickinson's stance was largely grounded in the dual premise that either rejected women or depicted women as passive. Through Calvinism Dickinson believed that women functioned \\\"within the discourse of man, a signifier that has always referred back to its opposite signifier which annihilates its specific energy and diminishes or stifles its very different sound\\\" (39). If women were to create their own voice they would have to \\\"turn it around, and seize it; ... make it theirs . . . bite that tongue with her very own teeth to invent for herself a language to get outside of' (39). Dickinson, in turn, suggested that women create their own language and form of expression, one based on a poetic technique whose meaning lies primarily hidden in narrative gaps. Sentimentalism - because of its overtness - depicted women as passive, in Dickinson's estimation. The second phase of Dickinson's development was marked by an intellectual crisis wherein she mastered Calvinist theology. Throughout her second phase Dickinson maintained a radical shift from traditional orthodox views to heterodox ones. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":81429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historical journal of Massachusetts\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historical journal of Massachusetts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.45-4217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical journal of Massachusetts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.45-4217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

变化的狂喜:艾米莉·狄金森的诗歌发展。Aliki Bamstone著。汉诺威和伦敦:新英格兰大学出版社,2006。208页。45.00美元(精装)。传统上,评论家认为艾米丽·狄金森的作品停滞不前,但由于其阴谋和可能隐藏的意义而被阅读。Aliki Barnstone发表的博士论文《改变狂喜:艾米莉·狄金森的诗歌发展》认为,狄金森的作品发展是一个非常复杂的三阶段过程。狄金森的诗歌发展,或如巴恩斯通所说的狂喜,标志着她与加尔文主义的斗争,以及她对超验主义的参与。密苏里大学的英语教授巴恩斯通将狄金森的发展分为三个阶段:用讽刺来批判加尔文主义和感伤主义;在一次“自我皈依”或智力危机中,她掌握了加尔文主义神学;从与加尔文主义和自我封闭的斗争到重新评价拉尔夫·沃尔多·爱默生的自我和自立。巴恩斯通的研究带有马萨诸塞州的基调,因为它通过挑战和重新设计起源于马萨诸塞州的美国文化哲学,质疑了从清教徒起源到19世纪晚期的美国文化的基础。巴恩斯通将艾米莉·狄金森发展的第一阶段描述为对加尔文主义和感伤主义的讽刺批评。狄金森的立场在很大程度上基于两个前提,要么拒绝女性,要么把女性描绘成被动的。通过加尔文主义,狄金森认为,女性“在男人的话语中发挥作用,是一种能指,它总是指回它的相反能指,这种能指湮灭了它的特定能量,削弱或扼杀了它非常不同的声音”(39)。如果女性要创造自己的声音,她们就必须“扭转局面,抓住它;…让它成为他们的……用她自己的牙齿咬着舌头,为自己创造一种语言,以摆脱它”(39)。反过来,狄金森建议女性创造自己的语言和表达形式,一种基于诗歌技巧的表达方式,其意义主要隐藏在叙事空白中。在狄金森看来,感伤主义——由于其公开性——将女性描绘成被动的。狄金森发展的第二阶段以智力危机为标志,她掌握了加尔文主义神学。在她的第二阶段,狄金森保持了从传统正统观点到非正统观点的激进转变。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changing Rapture: Emily Dickinson's Poetic Development
Changing Rapture: Emily Dickinson's Poetic Development. By Aliki Bamstone. Hanover and London: University Press of New England, 2006. 208 pages. $45.00 (hardcover). Critics have traditionally viewed Emily Dickinson as a poet whose work remained stagnant but was read because of its intrigue and possible hidden meaning. Aliki Barnstone's published doctoral dissertation Changing Rapture: Emily Dickinson 's Poetic Development argues that Dickinson's work developed in a very complex three-phase progress. Dickinson's poetic development, or rapture, as Barnstone terms it, is marked by a struggle against Calvinism and her involvement with Transcendentalism. Barnstone, a Professor of English at the University of Missouri, describes Dickinson's three-step development as follows: the use of satire to critique Calvinism and Sentimentalism; a 'self-conversion' or intellectual crisis where she mastered Calvinist theology; and a struggle with Calvinism and selfinhalation to a re-evaluation of Ralph Waldo Emerson's selfhood and self-reliance. Barnstone's study carries a Massachusetts tenor, given that it questions the very basis of American culture from its Puritan origins to the late nineteenth century by challenging and reworking philosophies of American culture that originated in Massachusetts. Barnstone describes the first phase of Emily Dickinson's development as a satirical criticism against Calvinism and Sentimentalism. Dickinson's stance was largely grounded in the dual premise that either rejected women or depicted women as passive. Through Calvinism Dickinson believed that women functioned "within the discourse of man, a signifier that has always referred back to its opposite signifier which annihilates its specific energy and diminishes or stifles its very different sound" (39). If women were to create their own voice they would have to "turn it around, and seize it; ... make it theirs . . . bite that tongue with her very own teeth to invent for herself a language to get outside of' (39). Dickinson, in turn, suggested that women create their own language and form of expression, one based on a poetic technique whose meaning lies primarily hidden in narrative gaps. Sentimentalism - because of its overtness - depicted women as passive, in Dickinson's estimation. The second phase of Dickinson's development was marked by an intellectual crisis wherein she mastered Calvinist theology. Throughout her second phase Dickinson maintained a radical shift from traditional orthodox views to heterodox ones. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信