评价学习管理系统的中性逻辑方法

Q1 Mathematics
Nouran M. Radwan, M. B. Senousy, A. Riad
{"title":"评价学习管理系统的中性逻辑方法","authors":"Nouran M. Radwan, M. B. Senousy, A. Riad","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.50937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Uncertainty in expert systems is essential research point in artificial intelligence domain. Uncertain knowledge representation and analysis in expert systems is one of the challenges that takes researchers concern as different uncertainty types which are imprecision, vagueness, ambiguity, and inconsistence need different handling models. This paper reviews some of the multivalued logic models which are fuzzy set, intuitionistic fuzzy set, and suggests a new approach which is neutrosophic set for handling uncertainty in expert systems to derive decisions. The paper highlights, compares and clarifies the differences of these models in terms of the application area of problem solving. The results shows that neutrosophic expert system for learning management systems evaluation as a better option to simulate human thinking than fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy logic because fuzzy logic can't express false membership and intuitionistic fuzzy logic is not able to handle indeterminacy of information","PeriodicalId":46897,"journal":{"name":"Neutrosophic Sets and Systems","volume":"137 1","pages":"3-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neutrosophic Logic Approach for Evaluating Learning Management Systems\",\"authors\":\"Nouran M. Radwan, M. B. Senousy, A. Riad\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/ZENODO.50937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Uncertainty in expert systems is essential research point in artificial intelligence domain. Uncertain knowledge representation and analysis in expert systems is one of the challenges that takes researchers concern as different uncertainty types which are imprecision, vagueness, ambiguity, and inconsistence need different handling models. This paper reviews some of the multivalued logic models which are fuzzy set, intuitionistic fuzzy set, and suggests a new approach which is neutrosophic set for handling uncertainty in expert systems to derive decisions. The paper highlights, compares and clarifies the differences of these models in terms of the application area of problem solving. The results shows that neutrosophic expert system for learning management systems evaluation as a better option to simulate human thinking than fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy logic because fuzzy logic can't express false membership and intuitionistic fuzzy logic is not able to handle indeterminacy of information\",\"PeriodicalId\":46897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neutrosophic Sets and Systems\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"3-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neutrosophic Sets and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.50937\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neutrosophic Sets and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.50937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

专家系统的不确定性是人工智能领域的一个重要研究热点。专家系统中的不确定性知识表示与分析一直是研究人员关注的问题之一,不同的不确定性类型(不精确、模糊、歧义和不一致)需要不同的处理模型。本文综述了模糊集、直觉模糊集等多值逻辑模型,提出了一种处理专家系统不确定性的新方法——中性集。本文从问题解决的应用领域出发,对这些模型进行了突出、比较和澄清。结果表明,由于模糊逻辑不能表达虚假隶属度,直觉模糊逻辑不能处理信息的不确定性,中性专家系统在学习管理系统评价中比模糊和直觉模糊逻辑更能模拟人的思维
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neutrosophic Logic Approach for Evaluating Learning Management Systems
Uncertainty in expert systems is essential research point in artificial intelligence domain. Uncertain knowledge representation and analysis in expert systems is one of the challenges that takes researchers concern as different uncertainty types which are imprecision, vagueness, ambiguity, and inconsistence need different handling models. This paper reviews some of the multivalued logic models which are fuzzy set, intuitionistic fuzzy set, and suggests a new approach which is neutrosophic set for handling uncertainty in expert systems to derive decisions. The paper highlights, compares and clarifies the differences of these models in terms of the application area of problem solving. The results shows that neutrosophic expert system for learning management systems evaluation as a better option to simulate human thinking than fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy logic because fuzzy logic can't express false membership and intuitionistic fuzzy logic is not able to handle indeterminacy of information
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neutrosophic Sets and Systems
Neutrosophic Sets and Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Neutrosophic Sets and Systems (NSS) is an academic journal, published bimonthly online and on paper, that has been created for publications of advanced studies in neutrosophy, neutrosophic set, neutrosophic logic, neutrosophic probability, neutrosophic statistics etc. and their applications in any field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信