动作观察对下肢着地生物力学的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析

Q3 Medicine
D. Conte, Jarno Miani, C. Pinzini
{"title":"动作观察对下肢着地生物力学的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"D. Conte, Jarno Miani, C. Pinzini","doi":"10.5114/areh.2023.127924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-contact ACL injuries usually occur when an athlete lands from a jump. Therefore, landing training is frequently used as an injury-prevention strategy. This systematic review aims to investigate the effects of action observation in the motor learning of the proper landing technique for healthy adults. Randomized controlled trials were deemed eligible if they included athletically active healthy adults without a history of lower limb injuries and if they compared action observation, in the form of direct observation or video feedback, to the control. The outcome measures were lower extremity biomechanical parameters: sagittal plane flexion angles, dynamic knee valgus and vertical ground reaction force. Six trials were included. Two trials were rated at low risk of bias, one trial with some concerns and three trials with a high risk of bias. Pooled data analysis indicated that action observation improves peak knee flexion (MD 15.95, 95% CI 3.53 to 28.38, I2 = 92%) and initial contact knee flexion (MD 4.05, 95% CI 1.62 to 6.48, I2 = 0%). It may also improve peak hip flexion (MD 18.16, 95% CI – 1.71 to 38.03, I2 = 92%) and dynamic knee valgus (SMD 0.52, 95% CI – 0.31 to 1.34, I2 = 75%) and has no effect on vertical ground reaction force (SMD – 0.04, 95% CI – 0.68 to 0.61, I2 = 62%) compared to the control. In conclusion, we can state that action observation is a potential strategy to enhance motor learning of the proper lan - ding technique in healthy individuals","PeriodicalId":52524,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Rehabilitacji","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of action observation in the lower limb landing biomechanics: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"D. Conte, Jarno Miani, C. Pinzini\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/areh.2023.127924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Non-contact ACL injuries usually occur when an athlete lands from a jump. Therefore, landing training is frequently used as an injury-prevention strategy. This systematic review aims to investigate the effects of action observation in the motor learning of the proper landing technique for healthy adults. Randomized controlled trials were deemed eligible if they included athletically active healthy adults without a history of lower limb injuries and if they compared action observation, in the form of direct observation or video feedback, to the control. The outcome measures were lower extremity biomechanical parameters: sagittal plane flexion angles, dynamic knee valgus and vertical ground reaction force. Six trials were included. Two trials were rated at low risk of bias, one trial with some concerns and three trials with a high risk of bias. Pooled data analysis indicated that action observation improves peak knee flexion (MD 15.95, 95% CI 3.53 to 28.38, I2 = 92%) and initial contact knee flexion (MD 4.05, 95% CI 1.62 to 6.48, I2 = 0%). It may also improve peak hip flexion (MD 18.16, 95% CI – 1.71 to 38.03, I2 = 92%) and dynamic knee valgus (SMD 0.52, 95% CI – 0.31 to 1.34, I2 = 75%) and has no effect on vertical ground reaction force (SMD – 0.04, 95% CI – 0.68 to 0.61, I2 = 62%) compared to the control. In conclusion, we can state that action observation is a potential strategy to enhance motor learning of the proper lan - ding technique in healthy individuals\",\"PeriodicalId\":52524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postepy Rehabilitacji\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postepy Rehabilitacji\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/areh.2023.127924\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Rehabilitacji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/areh.2023.127924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

非接触性前交叉韧带损伤通常发生在运动员起跳落地时。因此,着陆训练经常被用作一种预防伤害的策略。本研究旨在探讨动作观察在健康成人正确落地技术运动学习中的作用。随机对照试验被认为是合格的,如果他们包括运动活跃的健康成年人,没有下肢损伤史,如果他们以直接观察或视频反馈的形式将行动观察与对照组进行比较。结果测量下肢生物力学参数:矢状面屈曲角度、动态膝关节外翻和垂直地面反作用力。纳入6项试验。两项试验被评为低偏倚风险,一项试验有一些关注,三项试验被评为高偏倚风险。合并数据分析表明,动作观察可改善膝关节峰值屈曲(MD 15.95, 95% CI 3.53 ~ 28.38, I2 = 92%)和初始接触性膝关节屈曲(MD 4.05, 95% CI 1.62 ~ 6.48, I2 = 0%)。与对照组相比,它还可以改善髋关节峰值屈曲(MD 18.16, 95% CI - 1.71至38.03,I2 = 92%)和动态膝关节外翻(SMD 0.52, 95% CI - 0.31至1.34,I2 = 75%),并且对垂直地面反作用力没有影响(SMD - 0.04, 95% CI - 0.68至0.61,I2 = 62%)。总之,我们可以说,动作观察是一个潜在的策略,以提高运动学习的适当的规划技术在健康个体
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effects of action observation in the lower limb landing biomechanics: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Non-contact ACL injuries usually occur when an athlete lands from a jump. Therefore, landing training is frequently used as an injury-prevention strategy. This systematic review aims to investigate the effects of action observation in the motor learning of the proper landing technique for healthy adults. Randomized controlled trials were deemed eligible if they included athletically active healthy adults without a history of lower limb injuries and if they compared action observation, in the form of direct observation or video feedback, to the control. The outcome measures were lower extremity biomechanical parameters: sagittal plane flexion angles, dynamic knee valgus and vertical ground reaction force. Six trials were included. Two trials were rated at low risk of bias, one trial with some concerns and three trials with a high risk of bias. Pooled data analysis indicated that action observation improves peak knee flexion (MD 15.95, 95% CI 3.53 to 28.38, I2 = 92%) and initial contact knee flexion (MD 4.05, 95% CI 1.62 to 6.48, I2 = 0%). It may also improve peak hip flexion (MD 18.16, 95% CI – 1.71 to 38.03, I2 = 92%) and dynamic knee valgus (SMD 0.52, 95% CI – 0.31 to 1.34, I2 = 75%) and has no effect on vertical ground reaction force (SMD – 0.04, 95% CI – 0.68 to 0.61, I2 = 62%) compared to the control. In conclusion, we can state that action observation is a potential strategy to enhance motor learning of the proper lan - ding technique in healthy individuals
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Postepy Rehabilitacji
Postepy Rehabilitacji Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Rehabilitation is not only directed to representatives of biological and medical sciences, specialists from almost all fields of medicine, such as cardiology, neurology, orthopedics, traumatology and internal diseases, have been published in it. The journal contains papers concerning psychological, sociological, and occupational rehabilitation, along with articles which deal with organization and marketing. The journal is also dedicated to the ethical problems of rehabilitation. A significant part of the published papers have focused on the problems of sport and physical activity for people with disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信