{"title":"手工疗法对腰椎间盘突出症患者疼痛、残疾和神经活动的影响:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Varun Singh, M. Malik","doi":"10.5114/areh.2022.119699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc (PIVD) is a common health issue affecting young and middle-aged populations. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of manual therapy interventions on pain, disability, and neural mobility in lumbar PIVD patients. Material and methods: Eighty-eight participants were assigned to four groups (22 people in each group): Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM) group, High-Velocity Low Amplitude (HVLA) thrust group, Neural Mobilization (NM) group and Control Treatment (CT) group. The outcomes measures, viz. changes in pain, disability, and straight leg raise range of motion (SLR ROM), were assessed at baseline, after four weeks of treatment, and after a six-week follow-up. Results: The greatest mean improvement was seen in the SMWLM group, with a VAS score of 6.05 ± 1.32, compared to the HVLA group (3.68 ± 0.75), NM group (3.2 ± 0.62) and CT group (1.91 ± 1.22), ODI score of 15.65 ± 2.43 compared to the HVLA group (11.89 ± 1.29), NM group (10.85 ± 1.53) and CT group (3.77 ± 2.43) and a SLR ROM score of 15.06 ± 3.1 compared to the HVLA group (7.89 ± 2.21), NM group (7.07 ± 2.58) and CT group (1.59 ± 2.58). Conclusions: SMWLM group showed the most significant mean change for visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and SLR ROM compared to other groups. SMWLM may be a better viable choice in conservative management of lumbar PIVD.","PeriodicalId":52524,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Rehabilitacji","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of manual therapy on pain, disability and neural mobility in patients of lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc: a randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Varun Singh, M. Malik\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/areh.2022.119699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc (PIVD) is a common health issue affecting young and middle-aged populations. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of manual therapy interventions on pain, disability, and neural mobility in lumbar PIVD patients. Material and methods: Eighty-eight participants were assigned to four groups (22 people in each group): Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM) group, High-Velocity Low Amplitude (HVLA) thrust group, Neural Mobilization (NM) group and Control Treatment (CT) group. The outcomes measures, viz. changes in pain, disability, and straight leg raise range of motion (SLR ROM), were assessed at baseline, after four weeks of treatment, and after a six-week follow-up. Results: The greatest mean improvement was seen in the SMWLM group, with a VAS score of 6.05 ± 1.32, compared to the HVLA group (3.68 ± 0.75), NM group (3.2 ± 0.62) and CT group (1.91 ± 1.22), ODI score of 15.65 ± 2.43 compared to the HVLA group (11.89 ± 1.29), NM group (10.85 ± 1.53) and CT group (3.77 ± 2.43) and a SLR ROM score of 15.06 ± 3.1 compared to the HVLA group (7.89 ± 2.21), NM group (7.07 ± 2.58) and CT group (1.59 ± 2.58). Conclusions: SMWLM group showed the most significant mean change for visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and SLR ROM compared to other groups. SMWLM may be a better viable choice in conservative management of lumbar PIVD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postepy Rehabilitacji\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postepy Rehabilitacji\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/areh.2022.119699\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Rehabilitacji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/areh.2022.119699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of manual therapy on pain, disability and neural mobility in patients of lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc: a randomized controlled trial
Introduction: Lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc (PIVD) is a common health issue affecting young and middle-aged populations. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of manual therapy interventions on pain, disability, and neural mobility in lumbar PIVD patients. Material and methods: Eighty-eight participants were assigned to four groups (22 people in each group): Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM) group, High-Velocity Low Amplitude (HVLA) thrust group, Neural Mobilization (NM) group and Control Treatment (CT) group. The outcomes measures, viz. changes in pain, disability, and straight leg raise range of motion (SLR ROM), were assessed at baseline, after four weeks of treatment, and after a six-week follow-up. Results: The greatest mean improvement was seen in the SMWLM group, with a VAS score of 6.05 ± 1.32, compared to the HVLA group (3.68 ± 0.75), NM group (3.2 ± 0.62) and CT group (1.91 ± 1.22), ODI score of 15.65 ± 2.43 compared to the HVLA group (11.89 ± 1.29), NM group (10.85 ± 1.53) and CT group (3.77 ± 2.43) and a SLR ROM score of 15.06 ± 3.1 compared to the HVLA group (7.89 ± 2.21), NM group (7.07 ± 2.58) and CT group (1.59 ± 2.58). Conclusions: SMWLM group showed the most significant mean change for visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and SLR ROM compared to other groups. SMWLM may be a better viable choice in conservative management of lumbar PIVD.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Rehabilitation is not only directed to representatives of biological and medical sciences, specialists from almost all fields of medicine, such as cardiology, neurology, orthopedics, traumatology and internal diseases, have been published in it. The journal contains papers concerning psychological, sociological, and occupational rehabilitation, along with articles which deal with organization and marketing. The journal is also dedicated to the ethical problems of rehabilitation. A significant part of the published papers have focused on the problems of sport and physical activity for people with disabilities