Hernán Andrés de la Barra Ortiz, Alexandra Matamala, Francisca López Inostroza, Catalina Lobos Araya, Valeria Núñez Mondaca
{"title":"生物反馈在肌肉骨骼疾病康复中的疗效:系统综述","authors":"Hernán Andrés de la Barra Ortiz, Alexandra Matamala, Francisca López Inostroza, Catalina Lobos Araya, Valeria Núñez Mondaca","doi":"10.5114/areh.2022.113241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are a frequent reason for consultation and the main cause of disability in population. Electromyographic biofeedback or myofeedback (MF) is a promising treatment in rehabilitation, although studies supporting its benefits in MSD have declined in recent years. The objective of this review was to describe the efficacy of MF in function recovery, strength increase and muscle relaxation in MSD. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were identified in Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cinahl and Science Direct databases dated September 2, 2021. Four independent researchers reviewed articles titles and abstracts to determine their eligibility. Risk of bias and articles quality was asses sed using Rob2 tool (Cochrane) and PEDro scale. Functionality improvement, strength increase, and muscle relaxation were considered as main outcome. Search strategy yielded 160 articles after eliminating duplicates, reducing to 26 when selection criteria were applied. Articles were classified in strengthening (n = 16) and muscle relaxation (n = 10) according to MF therapeutic aim. Eighteen articles were rated as low risk of bias (69.22%) and an average internal validity of 6 points was obtained. Studies showed improvements in functionality, strength increase and pain reduction with statistical significance when MF were complemented with therapeutic exercises or other physical agents modalities (p < 0.005). MF also showed a decrease in fear of movement, depression, and pain perception, suggesting central modulating effects. This review supports MF efficacy in MSD rehabilitation, showing improvements in functionality and pain reduction. The re view allowed to establish a dosage recommendation based on articles analysis which can be considered for future RCTs.","PeriodicalId":52524,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Rehabilitacji","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of biofeedback in rehabilitation of musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Hernán Andrés de la Barra Ortiz, Alexandra Matamala, Francisca López Inostroza, Catalina Lobos Araya, Valeria Núñez Mondaca\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/areh.2022.113241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are a frequent reason for consultation and the main cause of disability in population. Electromyographic biofeedback or myofeedback (MF) is a promising treatment in rehabilitation, although studies supporting its benefits in MSD have declined in recent years. The objective of this review was to describe the efficacy of MF in function recovery, strength increase and muscle relaxation in MSD. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were identified in Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cinahl and Science Direct databases dated September 2, 2021. Four independent researchers reviewed articles titles and abstracts to determine their eligibility. Risk of bias and articles quality was asses sed using Rob2 tool (Cochrane) and PEDro scale. Functionality improvement, strength increase, and muscle relaxation were considered as main outcome. Search strategy yielded 160 articles after eliminating duplicates, reducing to 26 when selection criteria were applied. Articles were classified in strengthening (n = 16) and muscle relaxation (n = 10) according to MF therapeutic aim. Eighteen articles were rated as low risk of bias (69.22%) and an average internal validity of 6 points was obtained. Studies showed improvements in functionality, strength increase and pain reduction with statistical significance when MF were complemented with therapeutic exercises or other physical agents modalities (p < 0.005). MF also showed a decrease in fear of movement, depression, and pain perception, suggesting central modulating effects. This review supports MF efficacy in MSD rehabilitation, showing improvements in functionality and pain reduction. The re view allowed to establish a dosage recommendation based on articles analysis which can be considered for future RCTs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postepy Rehabilitacji\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postepy Rehabilitacji\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/areh.2022.113241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Rehabilitacji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/areh.2022.113241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)是就诊的常见原因,也是人口残疾的主要原因。肌电生物反馈或肌反馈(MF)是一种很有前途的康复治疗方法,尽管近年来支持其在MSD中的益处的研究有所减少。本综述的目的是描述MF在MSD的功能恢复,力量增加和肌肉放松方面的功效。随机临床试验(rct)在Pubmed、Scopus、Web of Science、Cinahl和Science Direct数据库中检索,检索日期为2021年9月2日。四名独立研究人员审查了文章的标题和摘要,以确定他们的资格。采用Rob2工具(Cochrane)和PEDro量表评估偏倚风险和文章质量。功能改善、力量增加和肌肉放松被认为是主要结果。搜索策略在消除重复后产生160篇文章,应用选择标准后减少到26篇。根据MF治疗目的将文章分为强化(n = 16)和肌肉放松(n = 10)两类。18篇文章被评为低偏倚风险(69.22%),平均内部效度为6分。研究表明,当MF与治疗性运动或其他物理药物方式相辅相成时,功能、力量增加和疼痛减轻的改善具有统计学意义(p < 0.005)。MF还显示运动恐惧、抑郁和痛觉减少,提示中枢调节作用。本综述支持MF在MSD康复中的疗效,显示功能改善和疼痛减轻。该综述允许在文献分析的基础上建立剂量推荐,可用于未来的随机对照试验。
Efficacy of biofeedback in rehabilitation of musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review
Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are a frequent reason for consultation and the main cause of disability in population. Electromyographic biofeedback or myofeedback (MF) is a promising treatment in rehabilitation, although studies supporting its benefits in MSD have declined in recent years. The objective of this review was to describe the efficacy of MF in function recovery, strength increase and muscle relaxation in MSD. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were identified in Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cinahl and Science Direct databases dated September 2, 2021. Four independent researchers reviewed articles titles and abstracts to determine their eligibility. Risk of bias and articles quality was asses sed using Rob2 tool (Cochrane) and PEDro scale. Functionality improvement, strength increase, and muscle relaxation were considered as main outcome. Search strategy yielded 160 articles after eliminating duplicates, reducing to 26 when selection criteria were applied. Articles were classified in strengthening (n = 16) and muscle relaxation (n = 10) according to MF therapeutic aim. Eighteen articles were rated as low risk of bias (69.22%) and an average internal validity of 6 points was obtained. Studies showed improvements in functionality, strength increase and pain reduction with statistical significance when MF were complemented with therapeutic exercises or other physical agents modalities (p < 0.005). MF also showed a decrease in fear of movement, depression, and pain perception, suggesting central modulating effects. This review supports MF efficacy in MSD rehabilitation, showing improvements in functionality and pain reduction. The re view allowed to establish a dosage recommendation based on articles analysis which can be considered for future RCTs.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Rehabilitation is not only directed to representatives of biological and medical sciences, specialists from almost all fields of medicine, such as cardiology, neurology, orthopedics, traumatology and internal diseases, have been published in it. The journal contains papers concerning psychological, sociological, and occupational rehabilitation, along with articles which deal with organization and marketing. The journal is also dedicated to the ethical problems of rehabilitation. A significant part of the published papers have focused on the problems of sport and physical activity for people with disabilities