碳酸氢水治疗胃灼热的疗效及耐受性。

A. Beer, R. Uebelhack, U. Pohl
{"title":"碳酸氢水治疗胃灼热的疗效及耐受性。","authors":"A. Beer, R. Uebelhack, U. Pohl","doi":"10.4291/wjgp.v7.i1.171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\nTo investigate the efficacy and safety of mineral water with a high content of hydrogen carbonate in patients with heartburn.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis open, single-center, single-arm clinical pilot study enrolled 50 patients, 18-64 years old, who had been suffering from heartburn at least twice a week for at least 3 mo before entering the study. Pharmacological treatment of heartburn was not permitted, and patients with severe organic diseases were excluded. After a run-in period of one week, the participants received 1.5 L of the test water for the following 6 wk; 300 mL with meals t.i.d., the remainder to be drunk throughout the day. During the trial, there were five visits at the study center (screening, baseline, two interim visits and the final visit). The efficacy endpoints included incidence and duration of heartburn episodes per week by patient's self-assessment (heartburn diary) as well as changes in symptom severity as per symptom specific questionnaires [Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ); Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD); Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index] and overall health-related quality of life per SF-12 (12-question short form) at each visit. At the end of the study, patients and investigators independently rated the overall efficacy of the test water on a 4-point Likert scale. Safety was assessed by evaluation of adverse events (AEs), vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure) and laboratory parameters. Changes from initial to final examinations were assessed by the non-parametric Wilcoxon test; categorical variables were compared using the χ(2) test, and for more than 5 categories, by the U-test.\n\n\nRESULTS\nTwenty-eight participants were men, 22 women. The mean age of the patients in the full analysis set/intention-to treat population (FAS/ITT) was 40.6 years. Forty-two participants completed the study according to the study protocol and formed the per-protocol set (PP population); 48 participants drank the water at least once as requested and were analyzed as ITT population. The occurrence of heartburn was statistically significantly reduced at wk 6 in both the ITT and the PP populations. At wk 6, the mean number of heartburn episodes/week decreased by 5.1 episodes (P < 0.001) and the mean duration of heartburn symptoms by 19 min (ITT) (P = 0.002). The frequency of heartburn symptoms was reduced in 89.6% of the patients (P < 0.001), and the duration of symptoms in 79.2% of patients (ITT) (P < 0.001). All dimensions of the RDQ (heartburn, regurgitation, gastro-esophageal reflux disease symptoms, dyspepsia) showed a significant improvement at 6 wk. Likewise, disease-specific quality of life improved significantly (QOLRAD, GIQLI). Overall, 89.4% of patients rated the efficacy of the test water as \"good\" or \"very good\", as did the investigators for 91.5% of the patients. There were no serious AEs. After 6 wk, systolic and diastolic blood pressure values decreased slightly but significantly [-3.5 and -3.0 mmHg, respectively (P = 0.008 and P = 0,002)]. Ninety-six percent of patients and investigators for the same percentage of patients rated the tolerability of the water as \"good\" or \"very good\".\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe data demonstrate effectiveness of a hydrogen carbonate-rich mineral water in alleviating heartburn frequency and severity, thereby improving quality of life. The water has excellent tolerability.","PeriodicalId":68755,"journal":{"name":"世界胃肠病理生理学杂志(电子版)(英文版)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and tolerability of hydrogen carbonate-rich water for heartburn.\",\"authors\":\"A. Beer, R. Uebelhack, U. Pohl\",\"doi\":\"10.4291/wjgp.v7.i1.171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIM\\nTo investigate the efficacy and safety of mineral water with a high content of hydrogen carbonate in patients with heartburn.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThis open, single-center, single-arm clinical pilot study enrolled 50 patients, 18-64 years old, who had been suffering from heartburn at least twice a week for at least 3 mo before entering the study. Pharmacological treatment of heartburn was not permitted, and patients with severe organic diseases were excluded. After a run-in period of one week, the participants received 1.5 L of the test water for the following 6 wk; 300 mL with meals t.i.d., the remainder to be drunk throughout the day. During the trial, there were five visits at the study center (screening, baseline, two interim visits and the final visit). The efficacy endpoints included incidence and duration of heartburn episodes per week by patient's self-assessment (heartburn diary) as well as changes in symptom severity as per symptom specific questionnaires [Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ); Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD); Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index] and overall health-related quality of life per SF-12 (12-question short form) at each visit. At the end of the study, patients and investigators independently rated the overall efficacy of the test water on a 4-point Likert scale. Safety was assessed by evaluation of adverse events (AEs), vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure) and laboratory parameters. Changes from initial to final examinations were assessed by the non-parametric Wilcoxon test; categorical variables were compared using the χ(2) test, and for more than 5 categories, by the U-test.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nTwenty-eight participants were men, 22 women. The mean age of the patients in the full analysis set/intention-to treat population (FAS/ITT) was 40.6 years. Forty-two participants completed the study according to the study protocol and formed the per-protocol set (PP population); 48 participants drank the water at least once as requested and were analyzed as ITT population. The occurrence of heartburn was statistically significantly reduced at wk 6 in both the ITT and the PP populations. At wk 6, the mean number of heartburn episodes/week decreased by 5.1 episodes (P < 0.001) and the mean duration of heartburn symptoms by 19 min (ITT) (P = 0.002). The frequency of heartburn symptoms was reduced in 89.6% of the patients (P < 0.001), and the duration of symptoms in 79.2% of patients (ITT) (P < 0.001). All dimensions of the RDQ (heartburn, regurgitation, gastro-esophageal reflux disease symptoms, dyspepsia) showed a significant improvement at 6 wk. Likewise, disease-specific quality of life improved significantly (QOLRAD, GIQLI). Overall, 89.4% of patients rated the efficacy of the test water as \\\"good\\\" or \\\"very good\\\", as did the investigators for 91.5% of the patients. There were no serious AEs. After 6 wk, systolic and diastolic blood pressure values decreased slightly but significantly [-3.5 and -3.0 mmHg, respectively (P = 0.008 and P = 0,002)]. Ninety-six percent of patients and investigators for the same percentage of patients rated the tolerability of the water as \\\"good\\\" or \\\"very good\\\".\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nThe data demonstrate effectiveness of a hydrogen carbonate-rich mineral water in alleviating heartburn frequency and severity, thereby improving quality of life. The water has excellent tolerability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":68755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"世界胃肠病理生理学杂志(电子版)(英文版)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"世界胃肠病理生理学杂志(电子版)(英文版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4291/wjgp.v7.i1.171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界胃肠病理生理学杂志(电子版)(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4291/wjgp.v7.i1.171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的探讨高含量碳酸氢矿泉水对胃灼热患者的疗效和安全性。方法:这项开放、单中心、单臂临床先导研究招募了50例18-64岁的患者,在进入研究前至少3个月每周至少发生两次胃灼热。不允许对胃灼热进行药物治疗,排除严重器质性疾病的患者。经过一周的磨合期后,参与者在接下来的6周内接受1.5升的测试水;300毫升,一日三餐,其余的要全天饮用。在试验期间,研究中心进行了五次访问(筛选,基线,两次中期访问和最后访问)。疗效终点包括通过患者自我评估(胃灼热日记)每周胃灼热发作的发生率和持续时间,以及根据症状特异性问卷[反流疾病问卷(RDQ);反流和消化不良患者的生活质量(QOLRAD)胃肠道生活质量指数]和每次就诊时每个SF-12(12个问题的简短表格)的总体健康相关生活质量。在研究结束时,患者和研究人员分别对测试水的整体功效进行了4分李克特评分。通过评估不良事件(ae)、生命体征(心率、血压)和实验室参数来评估安全性。通过非参数Wilcoxon检验评估从初始到期末考试的变化;分类变量的比较采用χ(2)检验,超过5个类别的比较采用u检验。结果男性28人,女性22人。完整分析集/意向治疗人群(FAS/ITT)中患者的平均年龄为40.6岁。42名参与者按照研究方案完成研究,形成每方案集(PP人群);48名参与者至少按要求喝了一次水,并作为ITT人群进行分析。在第6周,ITT组和PP组的胃灼热发生率均有统计学意义上的显著降低。在第6周,平均每周烧心次数减少5.1次(P < 0.001),平均烧心症状持续时间减少19分钟(ITT) (P = 0.002)。89.6%的患者出现烧心症状的频率降低(P < 0.001), 79.2%的患者(ITT)症状持续时间缩短(P < 0.001)。6周时,RDQ的所有维度(胃灼热、反流、胃食管反流疾病症状、消化不良)均有显著改善。同样,疾病特异性生活质量显著改善(QOLRAD, GIQLI)。总体而言,89.4%的患者将测试水的功效评为“好”或“非常好”,调查人员对91.5%的患者也这么认为。没有严重的ae。6周后,收缩压和舒张压值略有下降,但明显下降[分别为-3.5和-3.0 mmHg (P = 0.008和P = 0.002)]。96%的患者和相同比例的研究人员将水的耐受性评为“好”或“非常好”。结论富含碳酸氢的矿泉水可有效减轻胃灼热的频率和严重程度,从而改善生活质量。这种水的耐受性极好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and tolerability of hydrogen carbonate-rich water for heartburn.
AIM To investigate the efficacy and safety of mineral water with a high content of hydrogen carbonate in patients with heartburn. METHODS This open, single-center, single-arm clinical pilot study enrolled 50 patients, 18-64 years old, who had been suffering from heartburn at least twice a week for at least 3 mo before entering the study. Pharmacological treatment of heartburn was not permitted, and patients with severe organic diseases were excluded. After a run-in period of one week, the participants received 1.5 L of the test water for the following 6 wk; 300 mL with meals t.i.d., the remainder to be drunk throughout the day. During the trial, there were five visits at the study center (screening, baseline, two interim visits and the final visit). The efficacy endpoints included incidence and duration of heartburn episodes per week by patient's self-assessment (heartburn diary) as well as changes in symptom severity as per symptom specific questionnaires [Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ); Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD); Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index] and overall health-related quality of life per SF-12 (12-question short form) at each visit. At the end of the study, patients and investigators independently rated the overall efficacy of the test water on a 4-point Likert scale. Safety was assessed by evaluation of adverse events (AEs), vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure) and laboratory parameters. Changes from initial to final examinations were assessed by the non-parametric Wilcoxon test; categorical variables were compared using the χ(2) test, and for more than 5 categories, by the U-test. RESULTS Twenty-eight participants were men, 22 women. The mean age of the patients in the full analysis set/intention-to treat population (FAS/ITT) was 40.6 years. Forty-two participants completed the study according to the study protocol and formed the per-protocol set (PP population); 48 participants drank the water at least once as requested and were analyzed as ITT population. The occurrence of heartburn was statistically significantly reduced at wk 6 in both the ITT and the PP populations. At wk 6, the mean number of heartburn episodes/week decreased by 5.1 episodes (P < 0.001) and the mean duration of heartburn symptoms by 19 min (ITT) (P = 0.002). The frequency of heartburn symptoms was reduced in 89.6% of the patients (P < 0.001), and the duration of symptoms in 79.2% of patients (ITT) (P < 0.001). All dimensions of the RDQ (heartburn, regurgitation, gastro-esophageal reflux disease symptoms, dyspepsia) showed a significant improvement at 6 wk. Likewise, disease-specific quality of life improved significantly (QOLRAD, GIQLI). Overall, 89.4% of patients rated the efficacy of the test water as "good" or "very good", as did the investigators for 91.5% of the patients. There were no serious AEs. After 6 wk, systolic and diastolic blood pressure values decreased slightly but significantly [-3.5 and -3.0 mmHg, respectively (P = 0.008 and P = 0,002)]. Ninety-six percent of patients and investigators for the same percentage of patients rated the tolerability of the water as "good" or "very good". CONCLUSION The data demonstrate effectiveness of a hydrogen carbonate-rich mineral water in alleviating heartburn frequency and severity, thereby improving quality of life. The water has excellent tolerability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
336
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信