新诊断2型糖尿病患者β细胞功能的临床评价

J. Stojanovic, Teodora Beljić-Živković
{"title":"新诊断2型糖尿病患者β细胞功能的临床评价","authors":"J. Stojanovic, Teodora Beljić-Živković","doi":"10.5937/mp74-40304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dysfunctions underlining type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) evolution are insulin resistance and beta-cell secretory insufficiency. Practical but reliable beta-cell function (BCF) testing is still elusive. Methods of BCF measurement include the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA), glucagon stimulation test (GST), oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT), intravenous glucose tolerance tests (IVGTT), meal tolerance tests (MTT) and the hyperglycemic clamp procedure. Oral tests have the advantage of simpler use and superior approximation of real-life stimulation inclusive for incretin activation effects. The advantage of the test meal over the OGTT incudes a more adequate simulation of nutrients effect on incretin secretion. Therefore, a standardized test meal (STO) would best reflect the spike in insulin secretion after a meal in real life. Conclusion: Standardized test meal, as potent stimulus of C-peptide secretion, is a promising simple and naturalistic alternative to in vivo assess beta-cell function in an affordable outpatient setting, through analysis of C-peptide response in newly diagnosed diabetic patients, as potent stimulus of C-peptide secretion.","PeriodicalId":31558,"journal":{"name":"Medicinski Podmladak","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of beta cell function in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus in clinical practice\",\"authors\":\"J. Stojanovic, Teodora Beljić-Živković\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/mp74-40304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dysfunctions underlining type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) evolution are insulin resistance and beta-cell secretory insufficiency. Practical but reliable beta-cell function (BCF) testing is still elusive. Methods of BCF measurement include the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA), glucagon stimulation test (GST), oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT), intravenous glucose tolerance tests (IVGTT), meal tolerance tests (MTT) and the hyperglycemic clamp procedure. Oral tests have the advantage of simpler use and superior approximation of real-life stimulation inclusive for incretin activation effects. The advantage of the test meal over the OGTT incudes a more adequate simulation of nutrients effect on incretin secretion. Therefore, a standardized test meal (STO) would best reflect the spike in insulin secretion after a meal in real life. Conclusion: Standardized test meal, as potent stimulus of C-peptide secretion, is a promising simple and naturalistic alternative to in vivo assess beta-cell function in an affordable outpatient setting, through analysis of C-peptide response in newly diagnosed diabetic patients, as potent stimulus of C-peptide secretion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicinski Podmladak\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicinski Podmladak\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/mp74-40304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicinski Podmladak","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/mp74-40304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2型糖尿病(DM2)演变的功能障碍是胰岛素抵抗和β细胞分泌不足。实用但可靠的β细胞功能(BCF)测试仍然难以捉摸。测定BCF的方法包括稳态模型评估(HOMA)、胰高血糖素刺激试验(GST)、口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)、静脉葡萄糖耐量试验(IVGTT)、膳食耐量试验(MTT)和高血糖钳夹术。口服试验的优点是使用更简单,更接近现实生活中的刺激,包括肠促胰岛素的激活效果。与OGTT相比,试验餐的优点包括更充分地模拟营养物质对肠促胰岛素分泌的影响。因此,标准化测试餐(STO)最能反映现实生活中餐后胰岛素分泌的峰值。结论:标准化测试餐作为c肽分泌的有效刺激,是一种有希望的简单自然的替代方案,在可负担的门诊环境中评估体内β细胞功能,通过分析新诊断的糖尿病患者的c肽反应,作为c肽分泌的有效刺激。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of beta cell function in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus in clinical practice
Dysfunctions underlining type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) evolution are insulin resistance and beta-cell secretory insufficiency. Practical but reliable beta-cell function (BCF) testing is still elusive. Methods of BCF measurement include the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA), glucagon stimulation test (GST), oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT), intravenous glucose tolerance tests (IVGTT), meal tolerance tests (MTT) and the hyperglycemic clamp procedure. Oral tests have the advantage of simpler use and superior approximation of real-life stimulation inclusive for incretin activation effects. The advantage of the test meal over the OGTT incudes a more adequate simulation of nutrients effect on incretin secretion. Therefore, a standardized test meal (STO) would best reflect the spike in insulin secretion after a meal in real life. Conclusion: Standardized test meal, as potent stimulus of C-peptide secretion, is a promising simple and naturalistic alternative to in vivo assess beta-cell function in an affordable outpatient setting, through analysis of C-peptide response in newly diagnosed diabetic patients, as potent stimulus of C-peptide secretion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信