原发性经皮梗死动脉支架置入术后冠状动脉血流储备测定临界狭窄的功能意义

Irena Čolić, V. Vasilev, M. Dobric
{"title":"原发性经皮梗死动脉支架置入术后冠状动脉血流储备测定临界狭窄的功能意义","authors":"Irena Čolić, V. Vasilev, M. Dobric","doi":"10.5937/mp73-37852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Patients with myocardial infarction who are effectively treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may have significant coronary artery stenosis that is not responsible for current myocardial infarction. Non-infarction artery stenosis can cause serious adverse cardiac events, which can be avoided by performing PCI. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is defined as the ratio of the hyperemic mean blood flow velocity to the resting blood flow velocity for a given coronary artery. Coronary flow reserve decreases with increasing severity of the lesion. Aim: Determination of CFR prognostic value in patients with residual intermediate stenosis on non-infarcted artery after PCI. Material and methods: The prospective study included 106 patients treated at the University Clinical Center of Serbia in the period from July 2007 to December 2014. Coronary flow reserve was performed on a non-infarcted coronary artery with intermediate stenosis (40-70%). Adenosine was administered intravenously for two minutes to induce hyperemia at a dose of 140 mcg/kg/min. It was calculated as the ratio of the maximum diastolic flow rate under hyperemia and the maximum flow rate under basal conditions. Patients were invited for follow-up at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months to determine the occurrence of composite adverse events, which included: cardiac death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and myocardial revascularization (non-infarction lesion). Results: In our group of patients, 18 adverse events were reported during follow-up. A statistically highly significant difference (p < 0.001) in CFR values was found in patients with adverse events compared to patients without adverse events. The CFR >2 value had a high negative predictive value (95%) for the absence of adverse events. Conclusion: In patients with CFR > 2, revascularization can be safely delayed with continued optimal drug therapy.","PeriodicalId":31558,"journal":{"name":"Medicinski Podmladak","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the functional significance of borderline stenosis by determining coronary flow reserve, after primary percutaneous infarct artery intervention by stent implantation\",\"authors\":\"Irena Čolić, V. Vasilev, M. Dobric\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/mp73-37852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Patients with myocardial infarction who are effectively treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may have significant coronary artery stenosis that is not responsible for current myocardial infarction. Non-infarction artery stenosis can cause serious adverse cardiac events, which can be avoided by performing PCI. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is defined as the ratio of the hyperemic mean blood flow velocity to the resting blood flow velocity for a given coronary artery. Coronary flow reserve decreases with increasing severity of the lesion. Aim: Determination of CFR prognostic value in patients with residual intermediate stenosis on non-infarcted artery after PCI. Material and methods: The prospective study included 106 patients treated at the University Clinical Center of Serbia in the period from July 2007 to December 2014. Coronary flow reserve was performed on a non-infarcted coronary artery with intermediate stenosis (40-70%). Adenosine was administered intravenously for two minutes to induce hyperemia at a dose of 140 mcg/kg/min. It was calculated as the ratio of the maximum diastolic flow rate under hyperemia and the maximum flow rate under basal conditions. Patients were invited for follow-up at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months to determine the occurrence of composite adverse events, which included: cardiac death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and myocardial revascularization (non-infarction lesion). Results: In our group of patients, 18 adverse events were reported during follow-up. A statistically highly significant difference (p < 0.001) in CFR values was found in patients with adverse events compared to patients without adverse events. The CFR >2 value had a high negative predictive value (95%) for the absence of adverse events. Conclusion: In patients with CFR > 2, revascularization can be safely delayed with continued optimal drug therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicinski Podmladak\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicinski Podmladak\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/mp73-37852\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicinski Podmladak","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/mp73-37852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:心肌梗死患者经初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)有效治疗后,可能有明显的冠状动脉狭窄,但这不是导致当前心肌梗死的原因。非梗死性动脉狭窄可引起严重的心脏不良事件,可通过PCI避免。冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)定义为给定冠状动脉充血平均血流速度与静息血流速度之比。冠状动脉血流储备随着病变严重程度的增加而减少。目的:探讨非梗死动脉残余中度狭窄患者PCI术后CFR的预后价值。材料和方法:前瞻性研究纳入2007年7月至2014年12月在塞尔维亚大学临床中心治疗的106例患者。在中度狭窄(40-70%)的非梗死冠状动脉上进行冠状动脉血流储备。以140 mcg/kg/min的剂量静脉滴注腺苷2分钟诱导充血。以充血时最大舒张流速与基础条件下最大流速之比计算。在6、12、18和24个月对患者进行随访,以确定复合不良事件的发生情况,包括:心源性死亡、卒中、心肌梗死和心肌血运重建术(非梗死灶)。结果:本组患者随访期间共发生18例不良事件。有不良事件的患者与无不良事件的患者相比,CFR值有统计学高度显著差异(p < 0.001)。CFR bbbb2值对于无不良事件具有较高的阴性预测值(95%)。结论:在CFR bbb2患者中,通过持续的最佳药物治疗可以安全地延迟血运重建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of the functional significance of borderline stenosis by determining coronary flow reserve, after primary percutaneous infarct artery intervention by stent implantation
Introduction: Patients with myocardial infarction who are effectively treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may have significant coronary artery stenosis that is not responsible for current myocardial infarction. Non-infarction artery stenosis can cause serious adverse cardiac events, which can be avoided by performing PCI. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is defined as the ratio of the hyperemic mean blood flow velocity to the resting blood flow velocity for a given coronary artery. Coronary flow reserve decreases with increasing severity of the lesion. Aim: Determination of CFR prognostic value in patients with residual intermediate stenosis on non-infarcted artery after PCI. Material and methods: The prospective study included 106 patients treated at the University Clinical Center of Serbia in the period from July 2007 to December 2014. Coronary flow reserve was performed on a non-infarcted coronary artery with intermediate stenosis (40-70%). Adenosine was administered intravenously for two minutes to induce hyperemia at a dose of 140 mcg/kg/min. It was calculated as the ratio of the maximum diastolic flow rate under hyperemia and the maximum flow rate under basal conditions. Patients were invited for follow-up at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months to determine the occurrence of composite adverse events, which included: cardiac death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and myocardial revascularization (non-infarction lesion). Results: In our group of patients, 18 adverse events were reported during follow-up. A statistically highly significant difference (p < 0.001) in CFR values was found in patients with adverse events compared to patients without adverse events. The CFR >2 value had a high negative predictive value (95%) for the absence of adverse events. Conclusion: In patients with CFR > 2, revascularization can be safely delayed with continued optimal drug therapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信