对草案的基本反对意见和通过的第2.0版科学宪法

Q1 Arts and Humanities
M. Kokowski
{"title":"对草案的基本反对意见和通过的第2.0版科学宪法","authors":"M. Kokowski","doi":"10.4467/2543702XSHS.18.016.9336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents essential reservations about the proposal and the adopted Act 2.0 vel Constitution for Science. It focuses on the analysis of two topics: model of university and model of evaluation of journals and books. Our analysis is made in the light of knowledge of integrated sciences of science (containing, i.a., history of science, history of organization of higher education system and science, scientometrics and bibliometrics) and a model of university of new humanism.\n\nThe article calls for introduction of series of vital modifications in the analyzed Act 2.0 and implementing regulations to remedy their fundamental drawbacks.\n\nKey words: Act 2.0, Constitution for Science, models of university, the model of corporate university, the model of university of new humanism, Research University of the Polish Academy of Sciences, science of science, scientometrics, bibliometrics, model of evaluation of journals and books, „principle of inheritance of prestige”","PeriodicalId":36875,"journal":{"name":"Studia Historiae Scientiarum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Podstawowe zastrzeżenia wobec projektu i uchwalonej Ustawy 2.0 vel Konstytucji dla nauki\",\"authors\":\"M. Kokowski\",\"doi\":\"10.4467/2543702XSHS.18.016.9336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article presents essential reservations about the proposal and the adopted Act 2.0 vel Constitution for Science. It focuses on the analysis of two topics: model of university and model of evaluation of journals and books. Our analysis is made in the light of knowledge of integrated sciences of science (containing, i.a., history of science, history of organization of higher education system and science, scientometrics and bibliometrics) and a model of university of new humanism.\\n\\nThe article calls for introduction of series of vital modifications in the analyzed Act 2.0 and implementing regulations to remedy their fundamental drawbacks.\\n\\nKey words: Act 2.0, Constitution for Science, models of university, the model of corporate university, the model of university of new humanism, Research University of the Polish Academy of Sciences, science of science, scientometrics, bibliometrics, model of evaluation of journals and books, „principle of inheritance of prestige”\",\"PeriodicalId\":36875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Historiae Scientiarum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Historiae Scientiarum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.18.016.9336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Historiae Scientiarum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.18.016.9336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了对该提案和已通过的法案2.0级科学宪法的基本保留意见。重点分析了大学模式和期刊与图书评价模式两个主题。综合科学知识(包括科学史、高等教育系统组织史和科学史、科学计量学和文献计量学)和新人文主义大学模式。本文呼吁对所分析的法案2.0进行一系列重要修改,并实施法规,以弥补其根本缺陷。关键词:法案2.0、科学宪法、大学模式、企业大学模式、新人文主义大学模式、波兰科学院研究型大学、科学之科学、科学计量学、文献计量学、期刊与书籍评价模式、“声望继承原则”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Podstawowe zastrzeżenia wobec projektu i uchwalonej Ustawy 2.0 vel Konstytucji dla nauki
The article presents essential reservations about the proposal and the adopted Act 2.0 vel Constitution for Science. It focuses on the analysis of two topics: model of university and model of evaluation of journals and books. Our analysis is made in the light of knowledge of integrated sciences of science (containing, i.a., history of science, history of organization of higher education system and science, scientometrics and bibliometrics) and a model of university of new humanism. The article calls for introduction of series of vital modifications in the analyzed Act 2.0 and implementing regulations to remedy their fundamental drawbacks. Key words: Act 2.0, Constitution for Science, models of university, the model of corporate university, the model of university of new humanism, Research University of the Polish Academy of Sciences, science of science, scientometrics, bibliometrics, model of evaluation of journals and books, „principle of inheritance of prestige”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Historiae Scientiarum
Studia Historiae Scientiarum Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信