蒙大拿州西部木材采伐和机械场地准备后45年的生产力和土壤性质

Luke M. Cerise, D. Page-Dumroese, P. McDaniel, C. Mayn, R. Heinse
{"title":"蒙大拿州西部木材采伐和机械场地准备后45年的生产力和土壤性质","authors":"Luke M. Cerise, D. Page-Dumroese, P. McDaniel, C. Mayn, R. Heinse","doi":"10.5849/WJAF.12-013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Site preparation following timber harvests is widely used to increase seedling establishment postharvest. Historically, dozer piling and ripping were the most common forms of site preparation in the Intermountain West. Less commonly, terracing of hill slopes was another form of site preparation on the Bitterroot National Forest in western Montana from 1961–1970 on marginally productive lands. Our objective was to compare soil physical and chemical propertie sa s well as timber productivity as evidenced by diameter-at-breast height (dbh) between terraced and standard-site preparation methods as well as unharvested stands. We collected and analyzed soil samples for bulk density, mineral cations, total C, total N, organic matter, particle size, and pH, forest floor measurements, tree dbh, and ground cover. Even after 45 years, visual soil disturbance in site-prepared stands was still observable with a majority of sites having some degree of compaction or rutting damage. Many soil chemical and physical properties were not significantly different among the two site treatments and the unharvested control stands. However, soil organic matter was significantly lower in the terraced and standard site-prepared stands than in the unharvested stands. Ponderosa pine dbh was greater in the terraced stands than in the nonterraced stands, but understory species diversity was low. The loss of surface soil organic matter and understory species associated with both forms of site preparation is a concern for future forest management. Leaving forest residue during harvest operations, limiting travel routes during management operations, and minimizing forest floor displacement may allow for limited soil impacts on future site-prepared stands.","PeriodicalId":51220,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Applied Forestry","volume":"28 1","pages":"158-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5849/WJAF.12-013","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Productivity and soil properties 45 years after timber harvest and mechanical site preparation in western Montana\",\"authors\":\"Luke M. Cerise, D. Page-Dumroese, P. McDaniel, C. Mayn, R. Heinse\",\"doi\":\"10.5849/WJAF.12-013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Site preparation following timber harvests is widely used to increase seedling establishment postharvest. Historically, dozer piling and ripping were the most common forms of site preparation in the Intermountain West. Less commonly, terracing of hill slopes was another form of site preparation on the Bitterroot National Forest in western Montana from 1961–1970 on marginally productive lands. Our objective was to compare soil physical and chemical propertie sa s well as timber productivity as evidenced by diameter-at-breast height (dbh) between terraced and standard-site preparation methods as well as unharvested stands. We collected and analyzed soil samples for bulk density, mineral cations, total C, total N, organic matter, particle size, and pH, forest floor measurements, tree dbh, and ground cover. Even after 45 years, visual soil disturbance in site-prepared stands was still observable with a majority of sites having some degree of compaction or rutting damage. Many soil chemical and physical properties were not significantly different among the two site treatments and the unharvested control stands. However, soil organic matter was significantly lower in the terraced and standard site-prepared stands than in the unharvested stands. Ponderosa pine dbh was greater in the terraced stands than in the nonterraced stands, but understory species diversity was low. The loss of surface soil organic matter and understory species associated with both forms of site preparation is a concern for future forest management. Leaving forest residue during harvest operations, limiting travel routes during management operations, and minimizing forest floor displacement may allow for limited soil impacts on future site-prepared stands.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Western Journal of Applied Forestry\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"158-165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5849/WJAF.12-013\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Western Journal of Applied Forestry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5849/WJAF.12-013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Applied Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5849/WJAF.12-013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

采伐后的场地准备被广泛用于增加采伐后的幼苗建立。从历史上看,推土机打桩和撕裂是山间西部最常见的场地准备形式。1961年至1970年,在蒙大拿州西部的比特根国家森林,在边际生产力土地上,山坡梯田是另一种形式的场地准备。我们的目的是比较土壤的物理和化学性质,以及木材生产力,这是由梯田和标准立地制备方法以及未采伐的林分之间的胸径高度(dbh)所证明的。我们收集并分析了土壤样品的容重、矿物阳离子、总碳、总氮、有机质、颗粒大小、pH、森林地面测量、树木胸径和地面覆盖。即使在45年后,人工立地林分仍存在明显的土壤扰动,大多数立地存在一定程度的压实或车辙破坏。两种立地处理与未收获对照林的土壤理化性质无显著差异。然而,梯田和标准立地林分的土壤有机质显著低于未采伐林分。阶地林分黄松胸径大于非阶地林分,但林下物种多样性较低。与这两种形式的立地准备有关的表层土壤有机质和林下物种的损失是未来森林管理的一个问题。在采伐作业期间留下森林残留物,在管理作业期间限制旅行路线,并尽量减少森林地面位移,可能会对未来的立地准备林分造成有限的土壤影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Productivity and soil properties 45 years after timber harvest and mechanical site preparation in western Montana
Site preparation following timber harvests is widely used to increase seedling establishment postharvest. Historically, dozer piling and ripping were the most common forms of site preparation in the Intermountain West. Less commonly, terracing of hill slopes was another form of site preparation on the Bitterroot National Forest in western Montana from 1961–1970 on marginally productive lands. Our objective was to compare soil physical and chemical propertie sa s well as timber productivity as evidenced by diameter-at-breast height (dbh) between terraced and standard-site preparation methods as well as unharvested stands. We collected and analyzed soil samples for bulk density, mineral cations, total C, total N, organic matter, particle size, and pH, forest floor measurements, tree dbh, and ground cover. Even after 45 years, visual soil disturbance in site-prepared stands was still observable with a majority of sites having some degree of compaction or rutting damage. Many soil chemical and physical properties were not significantly different among the two site treatments and the unharvested control stands. However, soil organic matter was significantly lower in the terraced and standard site-prepared stands than in the unharvested stands. Ponderosa pine dbh was greater in the terraced stands than in the nonterraced stands, but understory species diversity was low. The loss of surface soil organic matter and understory species associated with both forms of site preparation is a concern for future forest management. Leaving forest residue during harvest operations, limiting travel routes during management operations, and minimizing forest floor displacement may allow for limited soil impacts on future site-prepared stands.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信