对捷克斯洛伐克国家社会党1924年斯洛伐克主教牧函的反思

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Pavel Marek
{"title":"对捷克斯洛伐克国家社会党1924年斯洛伐克主教牧函的反思","authors":"Pavel Marek","doi":"10.54937/kd.2023.14.supp.122-146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Slovak and Subcarpathian Ruthenia bishops of the Catholic and Greek Catholic Churches published a pastoral letter in November 1924 to respond to the fact that some members of these churches were members of communist, socialist or progressive organizations that rejected belief in God, criticizing the churches from atheistic positions and striving to create a secular society. The socialists, in an effort to expand their membership and electorate, went so far as to formally present themselves with Christian symbolism, which was supposed to deceive Catholics in a difficult social position and attract them to their ranks. The bishops reflected on this fact and, through the Pastoral Letter, explained to the members of their churches the destructiveness of socialist and progressive theories and recommended that they leave anti-Catholic organizations. Those Catholics who deliberately failed to take their teachings and warnings into account had to expect that the church would not administer certain sacraments to them. The publication of the Pastoral Letter provoked a fierce reaction in socialist and progressive circles as an attack against the state, its constitution and laws, the government and the democratic system that threatened the very existence of the Republic. The Pastoral Letter and its authors, the Catholic Church, the Holy See and Czech and Slovak political Catholicism were violently attacked by journalists and it triggered a press affair. Subsequently, the question time of German Social Democrats in the Chamber of Deputies resulted in a government crisis solved not only by the government, parliament, and political parties, but also by the so-called Pětka (Committee of Five) as the supreme body of Czechoslovak politics. The search for a way out of the government crisis showed that the socialists, especially the Czechoslovak National Socialist Party, did not want to defend their own ideology in the case, but used the publication of the Letter to pressure the Czechoslovak People’s Party, which, as part of the government coalition and the Švehla government, hindered the solution of the issue of regulating the relationship between the state and the Catholic Church. They wanted to force a change in its attitude by acting tactically with the idea of a minority government without the participation of the Czechoslovak People’s Party. However, the Czechoslovak People’s Party’s leaders handled the difficult situation it found itself in due to pressure from its coalition partners and the Catholic Slovak People’s Party and the Prague radical wing of its own party formed around Rudolf Horský, thanks to the prudent policy of its chairman Jan Šrámek. Although it agreed to negotiate a regulation of the relationship between the state and the churches, it defended the membership of the Czechoslovak People’s Party in the governing coalition, agreed to prosecute only those priests who manifestly violated the law and defended the right of bishops to act independently in public within the limits of the law. The article analyses and evaluates the attitudes and behaviour of the Czechoslovak National Socialist Party in this case.","PeriodicalId":37774,"journal":{"name":"Kulturne Dejiny","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"K reflexi pastýřského listu slovenských biskupů z roku 1924 Československou stranou národně socialistickou\",\"authors\":\"Pavel Marek\",\"doi\":\"10.54937/kd.2023.14.supp.122-146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Slovak and Subcarpathian Ruthenia bishops of the Catholic and Greek Catholic Churches published a pastoral letter in November 1924 to respond to the fact that some members of these churches were members of communist, socialist or progressive organizations that rejected belief in God, criticizing the churches from atheistic positions and striving to create a secular society. The socialists, in an effort to expand their membership and electorate, went so far as to formally present themselves with Christian symbolism, which was supposed to deceive Catholics in a difficult social position and attract them to their ranks. The bishops reflected on this fact and, through the Pastoral Letter, explained to the members of their churches the destructiveness of socialist and progressive theories and recommended that they leave anti-Catholic organizations. Those Catholics who deliberately failed to take their teachings and warnings into account had to expect that the church would not administer certain sacraments to them. The publication of the Pastoral Letter provoked a fierce reaction in socialist and progressive circles as an attack against the state, its constitution and laws, the government and the democratic system that threatened the very existence of the Republic. The Pastoral Letter and its authors, the Catholic Church, the Holy See and Czech and Slovak political Catholicism were violently attacked by journalists and it triggered a press affair. Subsequently, the question time of German Social Democrats in the Chamber of Deputies resulted in a government crisis solved not only by the government, parliament, and political parties, but also by the so-called Pětka (Committee of Five) as the supreme body of Czechoslovak politics. The search for a way out of the government crisis showed that the socialists, especially the Czechoslovak National Socialist Party, did not want to defend their own ideology in the case, but used the publication of the Letter to pressure the Czechoslovak People’s Party, which, as part of the government coalition and the Švehla government, hindered the solution of the issue of regulating the relationship between the state and the Catholic Church. They wanted to force a change in its attitude by acting tactically with the idea of a minority government without the participation of the Czechoslovak People’s Party. However, the Czechoslovak People’s Party’s leaders handled the difficult situation it found itself in due to pressure from its coalition partners and the Catholic Slovak People’s Party and the Prague radical wing of its own party formed around Rudolf Horský, thanks to the prudent policy of its chairman Jan Šrámek. Although it agreed to negotiate a regulation of the relationship between the state and the churches, it defended the membership of the Czechoslovak People’s Party in the governing coalition, agreed to prosecute only those priests who manifestly violated the law and defended the right of bishops to act independently in public within the limits of the law. The article analyses and evaluates the attitudes and behaviour of the Czechoslovak National Socialist Party in this case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kulturne Dejiny\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kulturne Dejiny\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54937/kd.2023.14.supp.122-146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kulturne Dejiny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54937/kd.2023.14.supp.122-146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1924年11月,斯洛伐克和苏喀尔巴阡鲁塞尼亚天主教会和希腊天主教会的主教发表了一封牧函,回应这些教会的一些成员是拒绝信仰上帝的共产主义、社会主义或进步组织的成员,从无神论的立场批评教会,并努力创造一个世俗社会。为了扩大自己的成员和选民,社会主义者甚至在正式场合给自己戴上了基督教的象征,这本来是为了欺骗处于困境的天主教徒,吸引他们加入自己的行列。主教们反思了这一事实,并通过牧函向其教会成员解释了社会主义和进步理论的破坏性,并建议他们离开反天主教组织。那些故意不把他们的教导和警告考虑在内的天主教徒不得不期望教会不会对他们执行某些圣礼。《牧函》的出版在社会主义和进步界引起了激烈的反应,认为这是对国家、宪法和法律、政府和民主制度的攻击,威胁到共和国的存在。《牧函》及其作者、天主教会、教廷以及捷克和斯洛伐克的政治天主教受到记者的猛烈攻击,并引发了一场新闻事件。随后,德国社会民主党在众议院的提问时间导致了一场政府危机,不仅由政府、议会和政党解决,而且由作为捷克斯洛伐克政治最高机构的所谓“五人委员会”解决。寻求政府危机的出路表明,社会主义者,特别是捷克斯洛伐克国家社会党,并不想在此案中捍卫自己的意识形态,而是利用《信》的发表对作为政府联盟和Švehla政府一部分的捷克斯洛伐克人民党施加压力,阻碍了规范国家与天主教会关系问题的解决。他们希望在没有捷克斯洛伐克人民党参与的情况下,策略性地采取少数政府的想法,迫使其改变态度。然而,捷克斯洛伐克人民党领导人在执政伙伴和天主教斯洛伐克人民党以及以鲁道夫Horský为中心组成的党内布拉格激进派的压力下,处理了困难局面,这要归功于该党主席Jan Šrámek的审慎政策。虽然它同意就国家与教会之间的关系进行谈判,但它为捷克斯洛伐克人民党在执政联盟中的成员资格辩护,同意只起诉那些明显违反法律的神父,并捍卫主教在法律范围内公开独立行动的权利。本文分析和评价了捷克斯洛伐克国家社会党在这一事件中的态度和行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
K reflexi pastýřského listu slovenských biskupů z roku 1924 Československou stranou národně socialistickou
The Slovak and Subcarpathian Ruthenia bishops of the Catholic and Greek Catholic Churches published a pastoral letter in November 1924 to respond to the fact that some members of these churches were members of communist, socialist or progressive organizations that rejected belief in God, criticizing the churches from atheistic positions and striving to create a secular society. The socialists, in an effort to expand their membership and electorate, went so far as to formally present themselves with Christian symbolism, which was supposed to deceive Catholics in a difficult social position and attract them to their ranks. The bishops reflected on this fact and, through the Pastoral Letter, explained to the members of their churches the destructiveness of socialist and progressive theories and recommended that they leave anti-Catholic organizations. Those Catholics who deliberately failed to take their teachings and warnings into account had to expect that the church would not administer certain sacraments to them. The publication of the Pastoral Letter provoked a fierce reaction in socialist and progressive circles as an attack against the state, its constitution and laws, the government and the democratic system that threatened the very existence of the Republic. The Pastoral Letter and its authors, the Catholic Church, the Holy See and Czech and Slovak political Catholicism were violently attacked by journalists and it triggered a press affair. Subsequently, the question time of German Social Democrats in the Chamber of Deputies resulted in a government crisis solved not only by the government, parliament, and political parties, but also by the so-called Pětka (Committee of Five) as the supreme body of Czechoslovak politics. The search for a way out of the government crisis showed that the socialists, especially the Czechoslovak National Socialist Party, did not want to defend their own ideology in the case, but used the publication of the Letter to pressure the Czechoslovak People’s Party, which, as part of the government coalition and the Švehla government, hindered the solution of the issue of regulating the relationship between the state and the Catholic Church. They wanted to force a change in its attitude by acting tactically with the idea of a minority government without the participation of the Czechoslovak People’s Party. However, the Czechoslovak People’s Party’s leaders handled the difficult situation it found itself in due to pressure from its coalition partners and the Catholic Slovak People’s Party and the Prague radical wing of its own party formed around Rudolf Horský, thanks to the prudent policy of its chairman Jan Šrámek. Although it agreed to negotiate a regulation of the relationship between the state and the churches, it defended the membership of the Czechoslovak People’s Party in the governing coalition, agreed to prosecute only those priests who manifestly violated the law and defended the right of bishops to act independently in public within the limits of the law. The article analyses and evaluates the attitudes and behaviour of the Czechoslovak National Socialist Party in this case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kulturne Dejiny
Kulturne Dejiny Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Cultural History (ISSN 1338-2209) is a peer-reviewed journal focused on history and anthropology. When we talk about the “cultural history”, we mean a wide scale of themes that are connected with acultural activities of man in the past. Issued semiannually, the journal deals with history in a broad sense up to its intersection with sociology, philosophy, theology, fine arts, and linguistics in all historical periods up to the present. Even though it is not territorially limited, the journal zeros in on the Central European region more precisely. Accepted languages are Slovak, Czech, Polish, English and German (papers in other languages will be translated).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信