利用遗传算法优化个体资源分配

Q3 Engineering
Chanwit Kangpanit, Suneerat Kusalasai
{"title":"利用遗传算法优化个体资源分配","authors":"Chanwit Kangpanit, Suneerat Kusalasai","doi":"10.5481/KKUENJ.2013.40.1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Construction activities are mostly determined by the technique known as critical path method (CPM) based on technical relationships and by resource allocation techniques which is used to examine daily resource requirement. These resource allocation techniques analyze the overall resource profile of a project without considering working timetable of any individual resource. Generally, in practice, an assigned foreman designated by a project manager will be responsible for assigning resources to a particular activity. Most of the time, this assignment is done when an activity is about to start. Therefore, working timetables of an individual resource cannot be known in advance. Although most foremen can allocate resources at low cost, there are many occasions that workers are forced to be idle between jobs or to suddenly change to different tasks. These could result in inefficiency as they affect workers’ income and their learning process. This paper proposes the use of genetic algorithm technique to assist in the search for a work plan resulting in the most cost-effective working timetable of an individual resource in a construction project with unlimited resources. In this study, the efficiency is measured in three dimensions including: the number of releases and re-hires, the number of resource idle days and the total number of resources required. To identify the most cost-effective schedule, five different schedules of a project example were generated. They are 1) early start schedule 2) late start schedule 3) min Mx schedule 4) min RRH schedule and 5) min RID schedule. Then the respective resource allocations are compared. The results show that, in the case that idle days were considered unpaid days, the Mx schedule delivered the lowest cost as well as the lowest number of resource requirement. In the case that resources were paid on idle days, the RID schedule was found to incur the lowest cost while RRH & RID schedules required the least number of total resources. Based on the study’s findings, it is recommended that, schedule analysis should be carried out with the planning of the individual resource timetable to be able to manage project resource efficiently and cost-effectively.","PeriodicalId":37310,"journal":{"name":"Engineering and Applied Science Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing individual resource assignment using genetic algorithm\",\"authors\":\"Chanwit Kangpanit, Suneerat Kusalasai\",\"doi\":\"10.5481/KKUENJ.2013.40.1.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Construction activities are mostly determined by the technique known as critical path method (CPM) based on technical relationships and by resource allocation techniques which is used to examine daily resource requirement. These resource allocation techniques analyze the overall resource profile of a project without considering working timetable of any individual resource. Generally, in practice, an assigned foreman designated by a project manager will be responsible for assigning resources to a particular activity. Most of the time, this assignment is done when an activity is about to start. Therefore, working timetables of an individual resource cannot be known in advance. Although most foremen can allocate resources at low cost, there are many occasions that workers are forced to be idle between jobs or to suddenly change to different tasks. These could result in inefficiency as they affect workers’ income and their learning process. This paper proposes the use of genetic algorithm technique to assist in the search for a work plan resulting in the most cost-effective working timetable of an individual resource in a construction project with unlimited resources. In this study, the efficiency is measured in three dimensions including: the number of releases and re-hires, the number of resource idle days and the total number of resources required. To identify the most cost-effective schedule, five different schedules of a project example were generated. They are 1) early start schedule 2) late start schedule 3) min Mx schedule 4) min RRH schedule and 5) min RID schedule. Then the respective resource allocations are compared. The results show that, in the case that idle days were considered unpaid days, the Mx schedule delivered the lowest cost as well as the lowest number of resource requirement. In the case that resources were paid on idle days, the RID schedule was found to incur the lowest cost while RRH & RID schedules required the least number of total resources. Based on the study’s findings, it is recommended that, schedule analysis should be carried out with the planning of the individual resource timetable to be able to manage project resource efficiently and cost-effectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering and Applied Science Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering and Applied Science Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5481/KKUENJ.2013.40.1.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering and Applied Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5481/KKUENJ.2013.40.1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建设活动主要是由关键路径法(CPM)技术决定的,该技术基于技术关系和资源分配技术,用于检查日常资源需求。这些资源分配技术分析项目的整体资源概况,而不考虑任何单个资源的工作时间表。通常,在实践中,由项目经理指定的指定领班将负责为特定活动分配资源。大多数情况下,这个任务是在活动即将开始时完成的。因此,无法提前知道单个资源的工作时间表。虽然大多数工头可以低成本地分配资源,但在很多情况下,工人被迫在工作之间空闲或突然转换到不同的任务。这可能会导致效率低下,因为它们影响了工人的收入和学习过程。本文提出利用遗传算法技术,在资源无限的建设项目中,协助寻找单个资源最具成本效益的工作时间表。在本研究中,效率从三个维度来衡量,包括:释放和重新雇用的数量,资源闲置天数和所需资源总数。为了确定最具成本效益的进度表,生成了一个项目示例的五个不同进度表。它们是:1)早启动计划2)晚启动计划3)最小Mx计划4)最小RRH计划5)最小RID计划。然后比较各自的资源分配。结果表明,在闲置日被视为无薪日的情况下,Mx计划的成本最低,资源需求也最少。在空闲日支付资源的情况下,RID计划产生的成本最低,而RRH和RID计划需要的总资源数量最少。根据研究结果,建议在规划单个资源时间表的同时进行进度分析,以便能够有效和经济地管理项目资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing individual resource assignment using genetic algorithm
Construction activities are mostly determined by the technique known as critical path method (CPM) based on technical relationships and by resource allocation techniques which is used to examine daily resource requirement. These resource allocation techniques analyze the overall resource profile of a project without considering working timetable of any individual resource. Generally, in practice, an assigned foreman designated by a project manager will be responsible for assigning resources to a particular activity. Most of the time, this assignment is done when an activity is about to start. Therefore, working timetables of an individual resource cannot be known in advance. Although most foremen can allocate resources at low cost, there are many occasions that workers are forced to be idle between jobs or to suddenly change to different tasks. These could result in inefficiency as they affect workers’ income and their learning process. This paper proposes the use of genetic algorithm technique to assist in the search for a work plan resulting in the most cost-effective working timetable of an individual resource in a construction project with unlimited resources. In this study, the efficiency is measured in three dimensions including: the number of releases and re-hires, the number of resource idle days and the total number of resources required. To identify the most cost-effective schedule, five different schedules of a project example were generated. They are 1) early start schedule 2) late start schedule 3) min Mx schedule 4) min RRH schedule and 5) min RID schedule. Then the respective resource allocations are compared. The results show that, in the case that idle days were considered unpaid days, the Mx schedule delivered the lowest cost as well as the lowest number of resource requirement. In the case that resources were paid on idle days, the RID schedule was found to incur the lowest cost while RRH & RID schedules required the least number of total resources. Based on the study’s findings, it is recommended that, schedule analysis should be carried out with the planning of the individual resource timetable to be able to manage project resource efficiently and cost-effectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering and Applied Science Research
Engineering and Applied Science Research Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Publication of the journal started in 1974. Its original name was “KKU Engineering Journal”. English and Thai manuscripts were accepted. The journal was originally aimed at publishing research that was conducted and implemented in the northeast of Thailand. It is regarded a national journal and has been indexed in the Thai-journal Citation Index (TCI) database since 2004. The journal now accepts only English language manuscripts and became open-access in 2015 to attract more international readers. It was renamed Engineering and Applied Science Research in 2017. The editorial team agreed to publish more international papers, therefore, the new journal title is more appropriate. The journal focuses on research in the field of engineering that not only presents highly original ideas and advanced technology, but also are practical applications of appropriate technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信