萨拉热窝城市公共空间的权利:每个人的,某个人的,任何人的,还是没有人的?

IF 0.6 Q4 URBAN STUDIES
Dina Šamić-Musemić, Nermina Zagora
{"title":"萨拉热窝城市公共空间的权利:每个人的,某个人的,任何人的,还是没有人的?","authors":"Dina Šamić-Musemić, Nermina Zagora","doi":"10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2021-32-02-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multiple socio-political and economic factors have grad-ually led to widespread neglect, decline, misuse, and loss of public spaces in Sarajevo. The clash between private and public interests has left physical traces in the city, recalling the importance of Lefebvre’s notion of the right to the city. In the context of the contemporary urban development of Sarajevo, this is translated into the right to shape, use, recycle, and reactivate the city’s neglected shared spaces. As implied by the title of this article, the key question addressed is to whom public space really belongs. This research proceeds from the identification of the key issues of degradation of public spaces, followed by the valorization of mainstream planning approaches and occasional bottom-up initiatives. It is argued that one of the key origins of the problem lies in dispersal and the lack of pertinent geospatial data on public spaces, as well as in the dissonance between all the relevant stakeholders. This article establishes a methodology for introducing a comprehensive, open, and interactive geospatial database as a platform for strategic planning, design, development, and maintenance of urban public spaces.","PeriodicalId":54093,"journal":{"name":"Urbani Izziv-Urban Challenge","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The right to urban public spaces in Sarajevo: Everybody’s, somebody’s, anybody’s, or nobody’s spaces?\",\"authors\":\"Dina Šamić-Musemić, Nermina Zagora\",\"doi\":\"10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2021-32-02-04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multiple socio-political and economic factors have grad-ually led to widespread neglect, decline, misuse, and loss of public spaces in Sarajevo. The clash between private and public interests has left physical traces in the city, recalling the importance of Lefebvre’s notion of the right to the city. In the context of the contemporary urban development of Sarajevo, this is translated into the right to shape, use, recycle, and reactivate the city’s neglected shared spaces. As implied by the title of this article, the key question addressed is to whom public space really belongs. This research proceeds from the identification of the key issues of degradation of public spaces, followed by the valorization of mainstream planning approaches and occasional bottom-up initiatives. It is argued that one of the key origins of the problem lies in dispersal and the lack of pertinent geospatial data on public spaces, as well as in the dissonance between all the relevant stakeholders. This article establishes a methodology for introducing a comprehensive, open, and interactive geospatial database as a platform for strategic planning, design, development, and maintenance of urban public spaces.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urbani Izziv-Urban Challenge\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urbani Izziv-Urban Challenge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2021-32-02-04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urbani Izziv-Urban Challenge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2021-32-02-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

多种社会政治和经济因素逐渐导致萨拉热窝公共空间被广泛忽视、衰落、滥用和丧失。私人和公共利益之间的冲突在城市中留下了有形的痕迹,让人想起列斐伏尔关于城市权利的概念的重要性。在萨拉热窝当代城市发展的背景下,这被转化为塑造、使用、回收和重新激活城市被忽视的共享空间的权利。正如本文标题所暗示的那样,关键问题是公共空间真正属于谁。这项研究从确定公共空间退化的关键问题开始,随后是对主流规划方法的评估和偶尔的自下而上的倡议。本文认为,问题的关键根源之一在于公共空间的分散和相关地理空间数据的缺乏,以及所有相关利益相关者之间的不协调。本文建立了一种方法来引入一个全面、开放和互动的地理空间数据库,作为城市公共空间战略规划、设计、开发和维护的平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The right to urban public spaces in Sarajevo: Everybody’s, somebody’s, anybody’s, or nobody’s spaces?
Multiple socio-political and economic factors have grad-ually led to widespread neglect, decline, misuse, and loss of public spaces in Sarajevo. The clash between private and public interests has left physical traces in the city, recalling the importance of Lefebvre’s notion of the right to the city. In the context of the contemporary urban development of Sarajevo, this is translated into the right to shape, use, recycle, and reactivate the city’s neglected shared spaces. As implied by the title of this article, the key question addressed is to whom public space really belongs. This research proceeds from the identification of the key issues of degradation of public spaces, followed by the valorization of mainstream planning approaches and occasional bottom-up initiatives. It is argued that one of the key origins of the problem lies in dispersal and the lack of pertinent geospatial data on public spaces, as well as in the dissonance between all the relevant stakeholders. This article establishes a methodology for introducing a comprehensive, open, and interactive geospatial database as a platform for strategic planning, design, development, and maintenance of urban public spaces.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信