加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独量表第三版的心理测量特性:欧洲葡萄牙语版

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Ananda Zeas-Sigüenza, Sara Oliveira, Cláudia Ferreira, Ana Ganho-Ávila, P. Vagos, Pablo Ruisoto
{"title":"加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独量表第三版的心理测量特性:欧洲葡萄牙语版","authors":"Ananda Zeas-Sigüenza, Sara Oliveira, Cláudia Ferreira, Ana Ganho-Ávila, P. Vagos, Pablo Ruisoto","doi":"10.5093/anyes2023a3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, the gold standard measure to assess loneliness is the University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness scale version 3 (UCLA v3). Objective. The aim of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties of UCLA v3 for the European Portuguese population. Method: A sample of 282 participants was surveyed in Portugal. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported a model portraying a global loneliness bifactor solution for positive and negative wording items, which achieved optimal fitness. Multi-group CFA indicates scalar and metric invariance across gender. Loneliness test scores (global score, positive items and negative items) correlated with well-established mental health indicators such as psychological stress, depressive and anxiety symptomatology, or psychological inflexibility. Internal consistency of the loneliness test scores was optimal for the global measure (α =.91;ω =.91) as well as for the positive (α =.87;ω =.87) and the negative factors (α =.86;ω =.88). Conclusions: Results support UCLA v3 as a reliable and valid measure of loneliness for future research studies interested in examining the prevalence of loneliness and impact in health in the context of Covid-19 in the Portuguese population and as a health indicator in health promotion and clinical interventions. © 2023 Sociedad Española para el Estudio de la Ansiedad y el Estrés - SEAS. Colegio de la Psicología de Madrid. Todos los derechos reservados.","PeriodicalId":45616,"journal":{"name":"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric properties of the University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale version 3: the European Portuguese version\",\"authors\":\"Ananda Zeas-Sigüenza, Sara Oliveira, Cláudia Ferreira, Ana Ganho-Ávila, P. Vagos, Pablo Ruisoto\",\"doi\":\"10.5093/anyes2023a3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, the gold standard measure to assess loneliness is the University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness scale version 3 (UCLA v3). Objective. The aim of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties of UCLA v3 for the European Portuguese population. Method: A sample of 282 participants was surveyed in Portugal. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported a model portraying a global loneliness bifactor solution for positive and negative wording items, which achieved optimal fitness. Multi-group CFA indicates scalar and metric invariance across gender. Loneliness test scores (global score, positive items and negative items) correlated with well-established mental health indicators such as psychological stress, depressive and anxiety symptomatology, or psychological inflexibility. Internal consistency of the loneliness test scores was optimal for the global measure (α =.91;ω =.91) as well as for the positive (α =.87;ω =.87) and the negative factors (α =.86;ω =.88). Conclusions: Results support UCLA v3 as a reliable and valid measure of loneliness for future research studies interested in examining the prevalence of loneliness and impact in health in the context of Covid-19 in the Portuguese population and as a health indicator in health promotion and clinical interventions. © 2023 Sociedad Española para el Estudio de la Ansiedad y el Estrés - SEAS. Colegio de la Psicología de Madrid. Todos los derechos reservados.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5093/anyes2023a3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5093/anyes2023a3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,评估孤独感的黄金标准是加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独感量表第3版(UCLA v3)。目标。本研究的目的是分析UCLA v3对欧洲葡萄牙人的心理测量特性。方法:在葡萄牙对282名参与者进行了调查。结果:验证性因子分析(CFA)支持一个模型,该模型描述了积极和消极措辞项目的全球孤独双因素解决方案,达到了最佳适应度。多组CFA表明跨性别的标量和度量不变性。孤独测试分数(整体得分,积极项目和消极项目)与心理健康指标相关,如心理压力,抑郁和焦虑症状,或心理不灵活性。孤独感测试分数的内部一致性在整体测量(α = 0.91;ω = 0.91)、积极因素(α = 0.87;ω = 0.87)和消极因素(α = 0.86;ω = 0.88)中都是最佳的。结论:结果支持UCLA v3作为一种可靠有效的孤独感测量方法,用于未来的研究,这些研究感兴趣的是在葡萄牙人口中检查Covid-19背景下孤独感的流行及其对健康的影响,并作为健康促进和临床干预的健康指标。©2023 Sociedad Española para el Estudio de la Ansiedad y el estr - SEAS。马德里学院Psicología。Todos los derechos reservados。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric properties of the University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale version 3: the European Portuguese version
Currently, the gold standard measure to assess loneliness is the University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness scale version 3 (UCLA v3). Objective. The aim of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties of UCLA v3 for the European Portuguese population. Method: A sample of 282 participants was surveyed in Portugal. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported a model portraying a global loneliness bifactor solution for positive and negative wording items, which achieved optimal fitness. Multi-group CFA indicates scalar and metric invariance across gender. Loneliness test scores (global score, positive items and negative items) correlated with well-established mental health indicators such as psychological stress, depressive and anxiety symptomatology, or psychological inflexibility. Internal consistency of the loneliness test scores was optimal for the global measure (α =.91;ω =.91) as well as for the positive (α =.87;ω =.87) and the negative factors (α =.86;ω =.88). Conclusions: Results support UCLA v3 as a reliable and valid measure of loneliness for future research studies interested in examining the prevalence of loneliness and impact in health in the context of Covid-19 in the Portuguese population and as a health indicator in health promotion and clinical interventions. © 2023 Sociedad Española para el Estudio de la Ansiedad y el Estrés - SEAS. Colegio de la Psicología de Madrid. Todos los derechos reservados.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress
Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信