过着有人类价值的生活玛莎·努斯鲍姆的全球健康

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 Q4 ETHICS
Odin Lysaker
{"title":"过着有人类价值的生活玛莎·努斯鲍姆的全球健康","authors":"Odin Lysaker","doi":"10.5324/EIP.V9I2.1871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nylig igangsatte FN Post-2015, sin nye utviklingsagenda. Sentralt er en global kamp for bedret helse, hvor det a leve et menneskeverdig liv star i sentrum. Imidlertid er forstaelsen av selve helsebegrepet omstridt. Noen mener at det bor knyttes an til jus og menneskerettigheter, mens andre foreslar etikk og menneskeverd. Dette hviler i sin tur pa motstridende menneskesyn i den globale helseetiske diskursen, nemlig mennesket som enten autonomt eller avhengig. I artikkelen analyserer jeg denne debatten ut fra det jeg hevder er Martha Nussbaums globale helseetikk, som baseres pa hennes kapabilitetstilnaerming sa vel som begrep om ‘helse som livskvalitet’. Min konklusjon er at Nussbaums normative begrunnelse for Post-2015 ut fra et kroppslig forankret menneskeverd er det mest overbevisende av de to konkurrerende svarene. Nokkelord:  global helseetikk, Martha Nussbaum, menneskeverd, menneskerettigheter, post-2015 English summary:  Living a dignified life - Martha Nussbaum's global health ethics The UN recently launched Post-2015, which is its new development agenda. Central here is the global struggle for improved health, in which what it takes to live a dignified life is stressed. However, the understanding of the notion of health is disputed. Some believe that it should be linked to law and the human rights, while others suggest ethics and human dignity. Which in turn rests on conflicting stands in the global health ethical discourse regards to the view of humanity, namely either as autonomous or dependent. In the paper I analyse this discourse, in which my point of departure is Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities approach as well as her concept of health as life quality. This I read exactly as a global health ethics. Thus, I conclude that between the two competing answers, Nussbaum’s normative justification for Post-2015 on the basis of bodily grounded human dignity is the most convincing. Keywords:  global health ethics, Martha Nussbaum, human dignity, human rights, Post-2015","PeriodicalId":42362,"journal":{"name":"Etikk I Praksis","volume":"9 1","pages":"53-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Å leve et menneskeverdig liv - Martha Nussbaums globale helseetikk\",\"authors\":\"Odin Lysaker\",\"doi\":\"10.5324/EIP.V9I2.1871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nylig igangsatte FN Post-2015, sin nye utviklingsagenda. Sentralt er en global kamp for bedret helse, hvor det a leve et menneskeverdig liv star i sentrum. Imidlertid er forstaelsen av selve helsebegrepet omstridt. Noen mener at det bor knyttes an til jus og menneskerettigheter, mens andre foreslar etikk og menneskeverd. Dette hviler i sin tur pa motstridende menneskesyn i den globale helseetiske diskursen, nemlig mennesket som enten autonomt eller avhengig. I artikkelen analyserer jeg denne debatten ut fra det jeg hevder er Martha Nussbaums globale helseetikk, som baseres pa hennes kapabilitetstilnaerming sa vel som begrep om ‘helse som livskvalitet’. Min konklusjon er at Nussbaums normative begrunnelse for Post-2015 ut fra et kroppslig forankret menneskeverd er det mest overbevisende av de to konkurrerende svarene. Nokkelord:  global helseetikk, Martha Nussbaum, menneskeverd, menneskerettigheter, post-2015 English summary:  Living a dignified life - Martha Nussbaum's global health ethics The UN recently launched Post-2015, which is its new development agenda. Central here is the global struggle for improved health, in which what it takes to live a dignified life is stressed. However, the understanding of the notion of health is disputed. Some believe that it should be linked to law and the human rights, while others suggest ethics and human dignity. Which in turn rests on conflicting stands in the global health ethical discourse regards to the view of humanity, namely either as autonomous or dependent. In the paper I analyse this discourse, in which my point of departure is Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities approach as well as her concept of health as life quality. This I read exactly as a global health ethics. Thus, I conclude that between the two competing answers, Nussbaum’s normative justification for Post-2015 on the basis of bodily grounded human dignity is the most convincing. Keywords:  global health ethics, Martha Nussbaum, human dignity, human rights, Post-2015\",\"PeriodicalId\":42362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Etikk I Praksis\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"53-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Etikk I Praksis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5324/EIP.V9I2.1871\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etikk I Praksis","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5324/EIP.V9I2.1871","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

最近启动了联合国2015年后,这是他的新发展日。中心是一场全球健康斗争,在这场斗争中,过上有人类价值的生活是中心。然而,对卫生部门本身的理解却被包围了。一些人认为这与法律和人权有关,而另一些人则认为这与道德和人类价值观有关。这反过来又开启了全球健康自由裁量权中相互矛盾的人类愿景,这意味着人类要么自主,要么依赖。在这篇文章中,我从玛莎·努斯鲍姆的全球健康实践中分析了这场辩论,基于她的能力适应,以及“健康即生活质量”的含义。我的结论是,努斯鲍姆对2015年后从改变身体的人类价值观出发的正常基础是两个竞争性答案中最令人信服的。Nokkelod:全球健康seetikk,Martha Nussbaum,人权,2015年后英文摘要:过有尊严的生活-Martha Nuss baum的全球健康伦理联合国最近推出了2015年后,这是其新的发展议程。这里的核心是改善健康的全球斗争,在这场斗争中,人们强调过上有尊严的生活需要什么。然而,对健康概念的理解存在争议。一些人认为它应该与法律和人权联系在一起,而另一些人则认为道德和人的尊严。这反过来又取决于全球健康伦理演讲中关于人类观的相互冲突的立场,即自主或依赖。在本文中,我分析了这篇文章,其中我的出发点是玛莎·努斯鲍姆的能力方法以及她将健康视为生活质量的概念。我读这篇文章完全是作为一种全球健康伦理。因此,我得出结论,在这两个相互竞争的答案中,努斯鲍姆基于身体为基础的人类尊严为2015年后做出的规范性辩护是最令人信服的。文字:↓全球健康伦理,玛莎·努斯鲍姆,人类尊严,人权,2015年后
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Å leve et menneskeverdig liv - Martha Nussbaums globale helseetikk
Nylig igangsatte FN Post-2015, sin nye utviklingsagenda. Sentralt er en global kamp for bedret helse, hvor det a leve et menneskeverdig liv star i sentrum. Imidlertid er forstaelsen av selve helsebegrepet omstridt. Noen mener at det bor knyttes an til jus og menneskerettigheter, mens andre foreslar etikk og menneskeverd. Dette hviler i sin tur pa motstridende menneskesyn i den globale helseetiske diskursen, nemlig mennesket som enten autonomt eller avhengig. I artikkelen analyserer jeg denne debatten ut fra det jeg hevder er Martha Nussbaums globale helseetikk, som baseres pa hennes kapabilitetstilnaerming sa vel som begrep om ‘helse som livskvalitet’. Min konklusjon er at Nussbaums normative begrunnelse for Post-2015 ut fra et kroppslig forankret menneskeverd er det mest overbevisende av de to konkurrerende svarene. Nokkelord:  global helseetikk, Martha Nussbaum, menneskeverd, menneskerettigheter, post-2015 English summary:  Living a dignified life - Martha Nussbaum's global health ethics The UN recently launched Post-2015, which is its new development agenda. Central here is the global struggle for improved health, in which what it takes to live a dignified life is stressed. However, the understanding of the notion of health is disputed. Some believe that it should be linked to law and the human rights, while others suggest ethics and human dignity. Which in turn rests on conflicting stands in the global health ethical discourse regards to the view of humanity, namely either as autonomous or dependent. In the paper I analyse this discourse, in which my point of departure is Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities approach as well as her concept of health as life quality. This I read exactly as a global health ethics. Thus, I conclude that between the two competing answers, Nussbaum’s normative justification for Post-2015 on the basis of bodily grounded human dignity is the most convincing. Keywords:  global health ethics, Martha Nussbaum, human dignity, human rights, Post-2015
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Etikk I Praksis
Etikk I Praksis Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信