{"title":"从村庄的声音到过去的回声。《Trelew的激情》,tomas Eloy martinez (1973-2009)","authors":"Victoria García","doi":"10.5195/ct/2020.483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"La pasión según Trelew occupies a paradoxical place in the work of Tomás Eloy Martínez. On the one hand, it is the book that changed the author's life, as he himself has described it, and the only one whose writing process went through practically all the stages of his literary work: it originally appeared in 1973 and was re-edited in 1997 and 2009, each time with textual variations introduced by the author. On the other hand, the book seems to constitute the crystallization of a concept of writing, based on trust in absolutes and on the militant confrontation between the true and the false, from which the writer sought to distance himself in later on his career. In this article, we propose to analyze the way in which this displacement is reflected in the different versions of the book. We will see that the versions of 1997 and 2009 tend to dilute the confrontation between truth and falsehood that initially shaped the account of the events that took place in Trelew in 1972. Likewise, the rewritings detract from the People's role as a collective subject that provided the basis for the confrontation between truth and lie that organized the text.","PeriodicalId":40660,"journal":{"name":"Catedral Tomada-Revista de Critica Literaria Latinoamericana-Journal of Latin American Literary Criticism","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Del sonido del Pueblo a los ecos del pasado. Las versiones de La pasión según Trelew, de Tomás Eloy Martínez (1973-2009)\",\"authors\":\"Victoria García\",\"doi\":\"10.5195/ct/2020.483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"La pasión según Trelew occupies a paradoxical place in the work of Tomás Eloy Martínez. On the one hand, it is the book that changed the author's life, as he himself has described it, and the only one whose writing process went through practically all the stages of his literary work: it originally appeared in 1973 and was re-edited in 1997 and 2009, each time with textual variations introduced by the author. On the other hand, the book seems to constitute the crystallization of a concept of writing, based on trust in absolutes and on the militant confrontation between the true and the false, from which the writer sought to distance himself in later on his career. In this article, we propose to analyze the way in which this displacement is reflected in the different versions of the book. We will see that the versions of 1997 and 2009 tend to dilute the confrontation between truth and falsehood that initially shaped the account of the events that took place in Trelew in 1972. Likewise, the rewritings detract from the People's role as a collective subject that provided the basis for the confrontation between truth and lie that organized the text.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catedral Tomada-Revista de Critica Literaria Latinoamericana-Journal of Latin American Literary Criticism\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catedral Tomada-Revista de Critica Literaria Latinoamericana-Journal of Latin American Literary Criticism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5195/ct/2020.483\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catedral Tomada-Revista de Critica Literaria Latinoamericana-Journal of Latin American Literary Criticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/ct/2020.483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
La pasión según Trelew在Tomás Eloy Martínez的作品中占据了一个矛盾的位置。一方面,正如作者自己所描述的那样,这本书改变了作者的生活,也是唯一一本在写作过程中几乎经历了他文学作品所有阶段的书:它最初出现于1973年,1997年和2009年重新编辑,每次都有作者介绍的文本变化。另一方面,这本书似乎构成了一种写作观念的结晶,这种观念建立在对绝对的信任和对真实与虚假的激进对抗的基础上,作者在后来的职业生涯中试图与之保持距离。在这篇文章中,我们打算分析这种位移是如何反映在这本书的不同版本中。我们将看到,1997年和2009年的版本倾向于淡化真实与虚假之间的对抗,这种对抗最初塑造了1972年发生在特雷卢的事件的叙述。同样,这些改写削弱了人民作为一个集体主体的作用,而这个主体为组织文本的真理与谎言之间的对抗提供了基础。
Del sonido del Pueblo a los ecos del pasado. Las versiones de La pasión según Trelew, de Tomás Eloy Martínez (1973-2009)
La pasión según Trelew occupies a paradoxical place in the work of Tomás Eloy Martínez. On the one hand, it is the book that changed the author's life, as he himself has described it, and the only one whose writing process went through practically all the stages of his literary work: it originally appeared in 1973 and was re-edited in 1997 and 2009, each time with textual variations introduced by the author. On the other hand, the book seems to constitute the crystallization of a concept of writing, based on trust in absolutes and on the militant confrontation between the true and the false, from which the writer sought to distance himself in later on his career. In this article, we propose to analyze the way in which this displacement is reflected in the different versions of the book. We will see that the versions of 1997 and 2009 tend to dilute the confrontation between truth and falsehood that initially shaped the account of the events that took place in Trelew in 1972. Likewise, the rewritings detract from the People's role as a collective subject that provided the basis for the confrontation between truth and lie that organized the text.