比较使用不同尺寸旋风分离器收集的 PM2.5 的化学特性和毒性

IF 1.1 Q4 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Zikrilla Bobamuratovich Alimov, Hyunwoo Youn, Ayumi Iwata, Kohei Nakano, Takuma Okamoto, Ayaha Sasaki, Takuya Katori, Tomoaki Okuda
{"title":"比较使用不同尺寸旋风分离器收集的 PM2.5 的化学特性和毒性","authors":"Zikrilla Bobamuratovich Alimov,&nbsp;Hyunwoo Youn,&nbsp;Ayumi Iwata,&nbsp;Kohei Nakano,&nbsp;Takuma Okamoto,&nbsp;Ayaha Sasaki,&nbsp;Takuya Katori,&nbsp;Tomoaki Okuda","doi":"10.5572/ajae.2022.062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cyclone sampling devices have been helpful in assessing the toxic effects of fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>). The particle collection efficiency of sampling devices is critical. This study investigated the effect of cyclone size on particle size, chemical composition, and particle toxicity. Three cyclones with different inner diameters (12–68 mm) were tested for penetration using an aerodynamic particle sizer, fluorescent polystyrene latex, and a differential mobility analyzer. The elemental and water-soluble ion compositions of the particles collected by different cyclones were compared. An evaluation of the particles’ toxicity was conducted by comparing the results of dithiothreitol (DTT), limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL), and cell exposure assays. The experimental evaluation showed a 50% cut-size of the cyclones between 0.17–0.28, 0.34–0.36, and 0.70 μm for the small, medium, and large cyclones, respectively. To collect PM<sub>2.5</sub> and evaluate separation performance in the real environment, the small and large cyclones were selected according to the particle penetration and flow rate. A comparison of chemical composition and enrichment factor values found that the particles in the small cyclone samples contained smaller and more anthropogenic sources than those in the large cyclone samples. The oxidative potential (OP) measured by the DTT assay of the samples collected using the small and large cyclones differed across sampling periods and associated with the transition metals. The viability of human epithelial A549 cells after exposure to the collected particles using the cyclones was different across sampling periods and associated with OP. The endotoxin concentrations measured in the LAL assay were found only in the large cyclone samples; they affected the estimated level of cytokine based on IL(interleukin)-6 release from human leukemia monocytic (THP-1) cells derived macro-phage-like cells. Regardless of the size, the cyclone techniques used in this study to collect aerosol particles would be a powerful tool for a detailed evaluation of particle toxicity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45358,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.5572/ajae.2022.062.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Chemical Characteristics and Toxicity of PM2.5 Collected Using Different Sizes of Cyclones\",\"authors\":\"Zikrilla Bobamuratovich Alimov,&nbsp;Hyunwoo Youn,&nbsp;Ayumi Iwata,&nbsp;Kohei Nakano,&nbsp;Takuma Okamoto,&nbsp;Ayaha Sasaki,&nbsp;Takuya Katori,&nbsp;Tomoaki Okuda\",\"doi\":\"10.5572/ajae.2022.062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Cyclone sampling devices have been helpful in assessing the toxic effects of fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>). The particle collection efficiency of sampling devices is critical. This study investigated the effect of cyclone size on particle size, chemical composition, and particle toxicity. Three cyclones with different inner diameters (12–68 mm) were tested for penetration using an aerodynamic particle sizer, fluorescent polystyrene latex, and a differential mobility analyzer. The elemental and water-soluble ion compositions of the particles collected by different cyclones were compared. An evaluation of the particles’ toxicity was conducted by comparing the results of dithiothreitol (DTT), limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL), and cell exposure assays. The experimental evaluation showed a 50% cut-size of the cyclones between 0.17–0.28, 0.34–0.36, and 0.70 μm for the small, medium, and large cyclones, respectively. To collect PM<sub>2.5</sub> and evaluate separation performance in the real environment, the small and large cyclones were selected according to the particle penetration and flow rate. A comparison of chemical composition and enrichment factor values found that the particles in the small cyclone samples contained smaller and more anthropogenic sources than those in the large cyclone samples. The oxidative potential (OP) measured by the DTT assay of the samples collected using the small and large cyclones differed across sampling periods and associated with the transition metals. The viability of human epithelial A549 cells after exposure to the collected particles using the cyclones was different across sampling periods and associated with OP. The endotoxin concentrations measured in the LAL assay were found only in the large cyclone samples; they affected the estimated level of cytokine based on IL(interleukin)-6 release from human leukemia monocytic (THP-1) cells derived macro-phage-like cells. Regardless of the size, the cyclone techniques used in this study to collect aerosol particles would be a powerful tool for a detailed evaluation of particle toxicity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.5572/ajae.2022.062.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.5572/ajae.2022.062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.5572/ajae.2022.062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

旋风取样装置有助于评估细颗粒物(PM2.5)的毒性影响。采样装置的颗粒收集效率至关重要。本研究调查了气旋大小对颗粒大小、化学成分和颗粒毒性的影响。使用空气动力颗粒测定仪、荧光聚苯乙烯胶乳和差分迁移率分析仪测试了三个不同内径(12-68 毫米)的旋风分离器的穿透性。比较了不同气旋收集的颗粒的元素和水溶性离子成分。通过比较二硫苏糖醇(DTT)、灰质卵母细胞裂解液(LAL)和细胞暴露试验的结果,对颗粒的毒性进行了评估。实验评估显示,小型、中型和大型旋风分离器的 50%切割尺寸分别为 0.17-0.28、0.34-0.36 和 0.70 μm。为了收集 PM2.5,并评估其在实际环境中的分离性能,根据颗粒穿透力和流速选择了小型和大型旋风分离器。对化学成分和富集因子值进行比较后发现,与大型旋风分离器样品相比,小型旋风分离器样品中的颗粒更小,含有更多的人为来源。通过 DTT 分析法测量的小旋风和大旋风收集的样本的氧化电位(OP)在不同采样期有所不同,并且与过渡金属有关。人类上皮细胞 A549 暴露于使用旋风收集器收集的颗粒后,其存活率在不同采样期有所不同,这与 OP 有关。在 LAL 检测法中测得的内毒素浓度仅出现在大型旋风样本中;根据从人类白血病单核细胞(THP-1)细胞衍生的类巨噬细胞释放的 IL(白细胞介素)-6,它们影响了细胞因子的估计水平。无论颗粒大小如何,本研究中用于收集气溶胶颗粒的旋风技术都将成为详细评估颗粒毒性的有力工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Chemical Characteristics and Toxicity of PM2.5 Collected Using Different Sizes of Cyclones

Cyclone sampling devices have been helpful in assessing the toxic effects of fine particulate matter (PM2.5). The particle collection efficiency of sampling devices is critical. This study investigated the effect of cyclone size on particle size, chemical composition, and particle toxicity. Three cyclones with different inner diameters (12–68 mm) were tested for penetration using an aerodynamic particle sizer, fluorescent polystyrene latex, and a differential mobility analyzer. The elemental and water-soluble ion compositions of the particles collected by different cyclones were compared. An evaluation of the particles’ toxicity was conducted by comparing the results of dithiothreitol (DTT), limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL), and cell exposure assays. The experimental evaluation showed a 50% cut-size of the cyclones between 0.17–0.28, 0.34–0.36, and 0.70 μm for the small, medium, and large cyclones, respectively. To collect PM2.5 and evaluate separation performance in the real environment, the small and large cyclones were selected according to the particle penetration and flow rate. A comparison of chemical composition and enrichment factor values found that the particles in the small cyclone samples contained smaller and more anthropogenic sources than those in the large cyclone samples. The oxidative potential (OP) measured by the DTT assay of the samples collected using the small and large cyclones differed across sampling periods and associated with the transition metals. The viability of human epithelial A549 cells after exposure to the collected particles using the cyclones was different across sampling periods and associated with OP. The endotoxin concentrations measured in the LAL assay were found only in the large cyclone samples; they affected the estimated level of cytokine based on IL(interleukin)-6 release from human leukemia monocytic (THP-1) cells derived macro-phage-like cells. Regardless of the size, the cyclone techniques used in this study to collect aerosol particles would be a powerful tool for a detailed evaluation of particle toxicity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment
Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
22
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信