巴基斯坦白沙瓦与交通有关的空气污染测量 - 一项试点研究

IF 1.1 Q4 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Mohsin Khan, Mohammad Abdul Aziz Irfan, Najeeb Ullah
{"title":"巴基斯坦白沙瓦与交通有关的空气污染测量 - 一项试点研究","authors":"Mohsin Khan,&nbsp;Mohammad Abdul Aziz Irfan,&nbsp;Najeeb Ullah","doi":"10.5572/ajae.2021.096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This pilot study measured Traffic-Related Air Pollution (TRAP) and calculated the corresponding Air Quality Index (AQI) in Peshawar. Using Libelium wireless sensors, the research measured outdoor TRAP and monitored indoor air quality for 48 days. The maximum outdoors daily mean concentration was 47 µg m<sup>−3</sup> for PM<sub>1</sub>, 90 µg m<sup>−3</sup> for PM<sub>2.5</sub>, 356 µg m<sup>−3</sup> for PM<sub>10</sub>, 258 ppb for SO<sub>2</sub>, and 219 ppb for NO<sub>2</sub>, respectively. This corresponds to PM<sub>2.5</sub> AQI of 158 (Unhealthy), PM<sub>10</sub> AQI of 148 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups; USG), SO<sub>2</sub> AQI of 181 (Unhealthy), and NO<sub>2</sub> AQI of 123 (USG). The maximum daily average concentration for the indoor condition was 31 µg m<sup>−3</sup> for PM<sub>1</sub>, 49 µg m<sup>−3</sup> for PM<sub>2.5</sub>, 78 µg m<sup>−3</sup> for PM<sub>10</sub>, 465 ppb for SO<sub>2</sub>, and 247 ppb for NO<sub>2</sub>, respectively. The corresponding AQI was 135 (USG) for PM<sub>2.5</sub>, 62 (Moderate) for PM<sub>10</sub>, 254 (Very Unhealthy) for SO<sub>2</sub>, and 129 (USG) for NO<sub>2</sub>. Data analysis shows that about 73% of the overall indoor AQI falls in the category of “USG”, while SO<sub>2</sub> was the largest contributor to overall AQI. The study concludes that indoor AQI was slightly better than outdoor AQI because of the distance and height from the outdoor location. Moreover, Pakistan’s AQI for PM<sub>2.5</sub> exceeds WHO’s 24-hours limit; however, it was relatively better by 23%, 65%, and 170% compared to China, India, and Bangladesh, respectively. In contrast, AQI for SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> was poor as compared to the same countries. The concentration and AQI for traffic-related air pollutants remain unhealthy and sometimes becomes hazardous, which means the sensitive groups are at greater risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45358,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.5572/ajae.2021.096.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of Traffic-Related Air Pollution in Peshawar, Pakistan - A Pilot Study\",\"authors\":\"Mohsin Khan,&nbsp;Mohammad Abdul Aziz Irfan,&nbsp;Najeeb Ullah\",\"doi\":\"10.5572/ajae.2021.096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This pilot study measured Traffic-Related Air Pollution (TRAP) and calculated the corresponding Air Quality Index (AQI) in Peshawar. Using Libelium wireless sensors, the research measured outdoor TRAP and monitored indoor air quality for 48 days. The maximum outdoors daily mean concentration was 47 µg m<sup>−3</sup> for PM<sub>1</sub>, 90 µg m<sup>−3</sup> for PM<sub>2.5</sub>, 356 µg m<sup>−3</sup> for PM<sub>10</sub>, 258 ppb for SO<sub>2</sub>, and 219 ppb for NO<sub>2</sub>, respectively. This corresponds to PM<sub>2.5</sub> AQI of 158 (Unhealthy), PM<sub>10</sub> AQI of 148 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups; USG), SO<sub>2</sub> AQI of 181 (Unhealthy), and NO<sub>2</sub> AQI of 123 (USG). The maximum daily average concentration for the indoor condition was 31 µg m<sup>−3</sup> for PM<sub>1</sub>, 49 µg m<sup>−3</sup> for PM<sub>2.5</sub>, 78 µg m<sup>−3</sup> for PM<sub>10</sub>, 465 ppb for SO<sub>2</sub>, and 247 ppb for NO<sub>2</sub>, respectively. The corresponding AQI was 135 (USG) for PM<sub>2.5</sub>, 62 (Moderate) for PM<sub>10</sub>, 254 (Very Unhealthy) for SO<sub>2</sub>, and 129 (USG) for NO<sub>2</sub>. Data analysis shows that about 73% of the overall indoor AQI falls in the category of “USG”, while SO<sub>2</sub> was the largest contributor to overall AQI. The study concludes that indoor AQI was slightly better than outdoor AQI because of the distance and height from the outdoor location. Moreover, Pakistan’s AQI for PM<sub>2.5</sub> exceeds WHO’s 24-hours limit; however, it was relatively better by 23%, 65%, and 170% compared to China, India, and Bangladesh, respectively. In contrast, AQI for SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> was poor as compared to the same countries. The concentration and AQI for traffic-related air pollutants remain unhealthy and sometimes becomes hazardous, which means the sensitive groups are at greater risk.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.5572/ajae.2021.096.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.5572/ajae.2021.096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.5572/ajae.2021.096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项试点研究测量了白沙瓦市与交通有关的空气污染(TRAP),并计算了相应的空气质量指数(AQI)。研究使用 Libelium 无线传感器测量了室外 TRAP,并对室内空气质量进行了 48 天的监测。室外最大日平均浓度分别为:PM1 47 微克/立方米、PM2.5 90 微克/立方米、PM10 356 微克/立方米、二氧化硫 258 ppb、二氧化氮 219 ppb。这相当于 PM2.5 的空气质量指数为 158(不健康),PM10 的空气质量指数为 148(敏感人群不健康;USG),二氧化硫的空气质量指数为 181(不健康),二氧化氮的空气质量指数为 123(USG)。室内环境的最大日平均浓度分别为:PM1 31 微克/立方米、PM2.5 49 微克/立方米、PM10 78 微克/立方米、二氧化硫 465 ppb 和二氧化氮 247 ppb。相应的空气质量指数分别为:PM2.5 135(USG),PM10 62(中度),SO2 254(非常不健康),NO2 129(USG)。数据分析显示,约 73% 的总体室内空气质量指数属于 "USG "类别,而二氧化硫是总体空气质量指数的最大贡献者。研究得出结论,由于与室外地点的距离和高度不同,室内空气质量指数略好于室外空气质量指数。此外,巴基斯坦 PM2.5 的空气质量指数超过了世界卫生组织规定的 24 小时限值;不过,与中国、印度和孟加拉国相比,巴基斯坦的空气质量指数相对要好 23%、65% 和 170%。相比之下,二氧化硫和二氧化氮的空气质量指数则低于上述国家。与交通有关的空气污染物的浓度和空气质量指数仍然不健康,有时甚至是危险的,这意味着敏感人群面临更大的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measurement of Traffic-Related Air Pollution in Peshawar, Pakistan - A Pilot Study

This pilot study measured Traffic-Related Air Pollution (TRAP) and calculated the corresponding Air Quality Index (AQI) in Peshawar. Using Libelium wireless sensors, the research measured outdoor TRAP and monitored indoor air quality for 48 days. The maximum outdoors daily mean concentration was 47 µg m−3 for PM1, 90 µg m−3 for PM2.5, 356 µg m−3 for PM10, 258 ppb for SO2, and 219 ppb for NO2, respectively. This corresponds to PM2.5 AQI of 158 (Unhealthy), PM10 AQI of 148 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups; USG), SO2 AQI of 181 (Unhealthy), and NO2 AQI of 123 (USG). The maximum daily average concentration for the indoor condition was 31 µg m−3 for PM1, 49 µg m−3 for PM2.5, 78 µg m−3 for PM10, 465 ppb for SO2, and 247 ppb for NO2, respectively. The corresponding AQI was 135 (USG) for PM2.5, 62 (Moderate) for PM10, 254 (Very Unhealthy) for SO2, and 129 (USG) for NO2. Data analysis shows that about 73% of the overall indoor AQI falls in the category of “USG”, while SO2 was the largest contributor to overall AQI. The study concludes that indoor AQI was slightly better than outdoor AQI because of the distance and height from the outdoor location. Moreover, Pakistan’s AQI for PM2.5 exceeds WHO’s 24-hours limit; however, it was relatively better by 23%, 65%, and 170% compared to China, India, and Bangladesh, respectively. In contrast, AQI for SO2 and NO2 was poor as compared to the same countries. The concentration and AQI for traffic-related air pollutants remain unhealthy and sometimes becomes hazardous, which means the sensitive groups are at greater risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment
Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
22
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信