(多)素养研究:教师在论坛和学术聊天中构建理论和教学假设

D. Hissa
{"title":"(多)素养研究:教师在论坛和学术聊天中构建理论和教学假设","authors":"D. Hissa","doi":"10.5216/LEP.V24I1.62536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to understand theoretical and didactic premises of teachers about (multi)literacies, we analyzed five discursive forums and seven chats of students of a post-graduate course in Literacy and Multiliteracies in e-learning modality. We verified the discussions about the new studies of teaching and pedagogy of multiliteracies focused on social practices. Our aim is to comprehend how teachers understand such theoretical premises and how they experience issues about literacy(ies) and multiliteracies in school environment. For a discussion on new literacies studies, we are based in the works of Street (2003, 2014), Soares (2002, 2003, 2004), Kleiman (1995, 2006); and for multiliteracies studies, we take NLG base (1996); Kalantzis and Cope (2008). The analyzed posts demonstrate that teachers of this course have more theoretical knowledge than concrete experiences in classroom, that is, they can conceptualize the terms, but they make few links with their experiences in classroom.","PeriodicalId":40597,"journal":{"name":"Linguagem-Estudos e Pesquisas","volume":"24 1","pages":"101-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ESTUDOS DE (MULTI)LETRAMENTOS: CONSTRUÇÃO DE PREMISSAS TEÓRICO-DIDÁTICAS POR PROFESSORES EM FÓRUNS E CHATS ACADÊMICOS\",\"authors\":\"D. Hissa\",\"doi\":\"10.5216/LEP.V24I1.62536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to understand theoretical and didactic premises of teachers about (multi)literacies, we analyzed five discursive forums and seven chats of students of a post-graduate course in Literacy and Multiliteracies in e-learning modality. We verified the discussions about the new studies of teaching and pedagogy of multiliteracies focused on social practices. Our aim is to comprehend how teachers understand such theoretical premises and how they experience issues about literacy(ies) and multiliteracies in school environment. For a discussion on new literacies studies, we are based in the works of Street (2003, 2014), Soares (2002, 2003, 2004), Kleiman (1995, 2006); and for multiliteracies studies, we take NLG base (1996); Kalantzis and Cope (2008). The analyzed posts demonstrate that teachers of this course have more theoretical knowledge than concrete experiences in classroom, that is, they can conceptualize the terms, but they make few links with their experiences in classroom.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguagem-Estudos e Pesquisas\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"101-120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguagem-Estudos e Pesquisas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5216/LEP.V24I1.62536\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguagem-Estudos e Pesquisas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5216/LEP.V24I1.62536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了了解教师关于(多重)读写能力的理论和教学前提,我们分析了电子学习模式下读写能力和多重读写能力研究生课程的五个话语论坛和七个对话。我们验证了以社会实践为中心的多元素养教学和教学法新研究的讨论。我们的目的是了解教师如何理解这些理论前提,以及他们如何在学校环境中经历有关读写和多元读写的问题。关于新识字研究的讨论,我们参考了Street(2003年、2014年)、Soares(2002年、2003年、2004年)、Kleiman(1995年、2006年);对于多元读写研究,我们采用NLG基础(1996);Kalantzis and Cope(2008)。从分析的岗位来看,该课程教师的理论知识多于具体的课堂经验,即他们可以对术语进行概念化,但与课堂经验的联系很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ESTUDOS DE (MULTI)LETRAMENTOS: CONSTRUÇÃO DE PREMISSAS TEÓRICO-DIDÁTICAS POR PROFESSORES EM FÓRUNS E CHATS ACADÊMICOS
In order to understand theoretical and didactic premises of teachers about (multi)literacies, we analyzed five discursive forums and seven chats of students of a post-graduate course in Literacy and Multiliteracies in e-learning modality. We verified the discussions about the new studies of teaching and pedagogy of multiliteracies focused on social practices. Our aim is to comprehend how teachers understand such theoretical premises and how they experience issues about literacy(ies) and multiliteracies in school environment. For a discussion on new literacies studies, we are based in the works of Street (2003, 2014), Soares (2002, 2003, 2004), Kleiman (1995, 2006); and for multiliteracies studies, we take NLG base (1996); Kalantzis and Cope (2008). The analyzed posts demonstrate that teachers of this course have more theoretical knowledge than concrete experiences in classroom, that is, they can conceptualize the terms, but they make few links with their experiences in classroom.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Linguagem-Estudos e Pesquisas
Linguagem-Estudos e Pesquisas LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信