法律文本和法律规范:

Nicolas Bortolotti Bortolon
{"title":"法律文本和法律规范:","authors":"Nicolas Bortolotti Bortolon","doi":"10.46901/revistadadpu.i10.p114-142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The changes introduced by Law 13.105 of March 16, 2015, which established the new Brazilian Civil Procedure Code, are, to a large extent, structural of all procedural law, without, therefore, being limited to the civil sphere, given its express linkage (Article 1st) to the fundamental rules of the Constitution. Among these changes, we highlight the issue of formally binding jurisprudential precedents, in particular the provisions of art. 486, §1, incs. V and VI, and 927, a subject that finds total pertinence with the activity of interpretation of the law, which, in turn, is also highlighted in art. 486, §§2nd and 3rd. This article deals with this preliminary theme with the question of precedents, namely the interpretation of the law (in the broad sense) as a process of formation of the legal norm and introduces the importance of the consensual limits to the activity of the interpreter of law.","PeriodicalId":34669,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Defensoria Publica da Uniao","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Texto de lei e norma jurídica:\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Bortolotti Bortolon\",\"doi\":\"10.46901/revistadadpu.i10.p114-142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The changes introduced by Law 13.105 of March 16, 2015, which established the new Brazilian Civil Procedure Code, are, to a large extent, structural of all procedural law, without, therefore, being limited to the civil sphere, given its express linkage (Article 1st) to the fundamental rules of the Constitution. Among these changes, we highlight the issue of formally binding jurisprudential precedents, in particular the provisions of art. 486, §1, incs. V and VI, and 927, a subject that finds total pertinence with the activity of interpretation of the law, which, in turn, is also highlighted in art. 486, §§2nd and 3rd. This article deals with this preliminary theme with the question of precedents, namely the interpretation of the law (in the broad sense) as a process of formation of the legal norm and introduces the importance of the consensual limits to the activity of the interpreter of law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Defensoria Publica da Uniao\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Defensoria Publica da Uniao\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46901/revistadadpu.i10.p114-142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Defensoria Publica da Uniao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46901/revistadadpu.i10.p114-142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2015年3月16日第13.105号法律带来的变化,确立了新的巴西民事诉讼法,在很大程度上是整个程序法的结构,因此,鉴于其明确的约束力,不限于民事领域(第13.105条)。1º)宪法的基本规则。在这些变化中,有一个主题是具有正式约束力的判例法,特别是第1条的规定。第486条第1款,incs。V、VI和927,这是一个与法律解释活动完全相关的主题,而法律解释活动在第1条中也有突出的特点。486,第2和第3段。本文讨论了判例问题的初步主题,即法律解释(广义上的)作为法律规范形成的过程,并介绍了共识限制对法律解释者活动的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Texto de lei e norma jurídica:
The changes introduced by Law 13.105 of March 16, 2015, which established the new Brazilian Civil Procedure Code, are, to a large extent, structural of all procedural law, without, therefore, being limited to the civil sphere, given its express linkage (Article 1st) to the fundamental rules of the Constitution. Among these changes, we highlight the issue of formally binding jurisprudential precedents, in particular the provisions of art. 486, §1, incs. V and VI, and 927, a subject that finds total pertinence with the activity of interpretation of the law, which, in turn, is also highlighted in art. 486, §§2nd and 3rd. This article deals with this preliminary theme with the question of precedents, namely the interpretation of the law (in the broad sense) as a process of formation of the legal norm and introduces the importance of the consensual limits to the activity of the interpreter of law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信