{"title":"是原发疾病的耐药复发还是持续性戒断综合征?长期服用苯二氮卓类药物患者的“镜像”症状","authors":"Anna Basińska-Szafrańska","doi":"10.5114/ppn.2019.89138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: In benzodiazepine (BZD) iatrogenic addiction, doses often run behind the growing level of the patient’s need. This creates experience of deficiency (withdrawal) symptoms, despite continued drug intake. As mirror reflections (negatives) of all the therapeutic actions of the drug, they mimic the original ailment, with extra symptoms. Despite observed resistance to standard treatment and responsiveness exclusively to BZD, these may be misinterpreted as a genuine malady, which dooms the outcome. Such mistakes need to be prevented. Case description: Two patients who began taking BZD to treat anxiety (female) and stress (male), over time became disability pensioners for “drug-resistant” anxiety disorders and “drug-resistant” somatic complaints. These ineffective treatments lasted until the dependence scenario was recognised. Proper treatment (detoxification) eliminated symptoms or made them responsive to standard treatment. Comment: Treating the “mirror” symptoms as a drug-resistant, genuine malady (or new diseases) worsens the patient’s condition and prognosis. Proper identification of the origin of a growing set of symptoms may result in a spectacular improvement.","PeriodicalId":39142,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5114/ppn.2019.89138","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A drug-resistant recurrence of the primary illness or a persistent withdrawal syndrome? “Mirror” symptoms in patients in long-term treatment with benzodiazepines\",\"authors\":\"Anna Basińska-Szafrańska\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/ppn.2019.89138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: In benzodiazepine (BZD) iatrogenic addiction, doses often run behind the growing level of the patient’s need. This creates experience of deficiency (withdrawal) symptoms, despite continued drug intake. As mirror reflections (negatives) of all the therapeutic actions of the drug, they mimic the original ailment, with extra symptoms. Despite observed resistance to standard treatment and responsiveness exclusively to BZD, these may be misinterpreted as a genuine malady, which dooms the outcome. Such mistakes need to be prevented. Case description: Two patients who began taking BZD to treat anxiety (female) and stress (male), over time became disability pensioners for “drug-resistant” anxiety disorders and “drug-resistant” somatic complaints. These ineffective treatments lasted until the dependence scenario was recognised. Proper treatment (detoxification) eliminated symptoms or made them responsive to standard treatment. Comment: Treating the “mirror” symptoms as a drug-resistant, genuine malady (or new diseases) worsens the patient’s condition and prognosis. Proper identification of the origin of a growing set of symptoms may result in a spectacular improvement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5114/ppn.2019.89138\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/ppn.2019.89138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ppn.2019.89138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A drug-resistant recurrence of the primary illness or a persistent withdrawal syndrome? “Mirror” symptoms in patients in long-term treatment with benzodiazepines
Purpose: In benzodiazepine (BZD) iatrogenic addiction, doses often run behind the growing level of the patient’s need. This creates experience of deficiency (withdrawal) symptoms, despite continued drug intake. As mirror reflections (negatives) of all the therapeutic actions of the drug, they mimic the original ailment, with extra symptoms. Despite observed resistance to standard treatment and responsiveness exclusively to BZD, these may be misinterpreted as a genuine malady, which dooms the outcome. Such mistakes need to be prevented. Case description: Two patients who began taking BZD to treat anxiety (female) and stress (male), over time became disability pensioners for “drug-resistant” anxiety disorders and “drug-resistant” somatic complaints. These ineffective treatments lasted until the dependence scenario was recognised. Proper treatment (detoxification) eliminated symptoms or made them responsive to standard treatment. Comment: Treating the “mirror” symptoms as a drug-resistant, genuine malady (or new diseases) worsens the patient’s condition and prognosis. Proper identification of the origin of a growing set of symptoms may result in a spectacular improvement.
期刊介绍:
The quarterly Advances in Psychiatry and Neurology is aimed at psychiatrists, neurologists as well as scientists working in related areas of basic and clinical research, psychology, social sciences and humanities. The journal publishes original papers, review articles, case reports, and - at the initiative of the Editorial Board – reflections or experiences on currently vivid theoretical and practical questions or controversies. Articles submitted to the journal are evaluated first by the Section Editors, specialists in the fields of psychiatry, clinical psychology, science of the brain and mind and neurology, and reviewed by acknowledged authorities in the respective field. Authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other.