Małgorzata Figlus, Magdalena Obrembska, E. Miller, A. Głąbiński
{"title":"阿登布鲁克认知检查- iii (ACE-III)测试作为筛查多发性硬化症过程中认知功能障碍的潜在新工具","authors":"Małgorzata Figlus, Magdalena Obrembska, E. Miller, A. Głąbiński","doi":"10.5114/PPN.2018.79556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Cognitive dysfunction occurs in more than half of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The evaluation of the level of cognitive functioning in MS patients is important for the assessment of the disease course and deciding on appropriate therapeutic interventions. The purpose of the study was to analyse the suitability of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III) as a screening tool for detecting cognitive dysfunctions in MS. Methods: The study included 28 MS patients and 24 ageand gender-matched controls. The evaluation of cognitive functioning was conducted with ACE-III. The results were subjected to statistical analysis expanded by determining the optimal cut-off points for individual subscales of the test. Results: The level of all cognitive functions was lower in MS patients. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.005) were demonstrated for the results of the ACE-III total score, memory, Mini-ACE (M-ACE) and fluency. The highest AUC values were obtained for total score, memory, M-ACE and fluency. With the cut-off level of 97 points, the test was characterised by sensitivity of 75% and specificity of over 95%. In terms of memory and fluency, the test was characterised by sensitivity close to 60% and specificity over 90%. Conclusions: The ACE-III presents high diagnostic accuracy, good sensitivity and diagnostic specificity in the assessment of cognitive dysfunctions in MS. The results of the study concerning the deteriorated functioning of MS patients in terms of memory and fluency coincide with the conclusions from the literature and are an attempt to characterise the profile of cognitive dysfunctions in MS patients.","PeriodicalId":39142,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5114/PPN.2018.79556","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III) test as a new potential tool for screening of cognitive dysfunctions in the course of multiple sclerosis\",\"authors\":\"Małgorzata Figlus, Magdalena Obrembska, E. Miller, A. Głąbiński\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/PPN.2018.79556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Cognitive dysfunction occurs in more than half of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The evaluation of the level of cognitive functioning in MS patients is important for the assessment of the disease course and deciding on appropriate therapeutic interventions. The purpose of the study was to analyse the suitability of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III) as a screening tool for detecting cognitive dysfunctions in MS. Methods: The study included 28 MS patients and 24 ageand gender-matched controls. The evaluation of cognitive functioning was conducted with ACE-III. The results were subjected to statistical analysis expanded by determining the optimal cut-off points for individual subscales of the test. Results: The level of all cognitive functions was lower in MS patients. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.005) were demonstrated for the results of the ACE-III total score, memory, Mini-ACE (M-ACE) and fluency. The highest AUC values were obtained for total score, memory, M-ACE and fluency. With the cut-off level of 97 points, the test was characterised by sensitivity of 75% and specificity of over 95%. In terms of memory and fluency, the test was characterised by sensitivity close to 60% and specificity over 90%. Conclusions: The ACE-III presents high diagnostic accuracy, good sensitivity and diagnostic specificity in the assessment of cognitive dysfunctions in MS. The results of the study concerning the deteriorated functioning of MS patients in terms of memory and fluency coincide with the conclusions from the literature and are an attempt to characterise the profile of cognitive dysfunctions in MS patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5114/PPN.2018.79556\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/PPN.2018.79556\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/PPN.2018.79556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
摘要
目的:超过一半的多发性硬化症(MS)患者发生认知功能障碍。评价多发性硬化症患者的认知功能水平对于评估病程和决定适当的治疗干预措施具有重要意义。本研究的目的是分析阿登布鲁克认知检查- iii (ACE-III)作为检测MS认知功能障碍的筛查工具的适用性。方法:研究包括28例MS患者和24例年龄和性别匹配的对照组。认知功能评估采用ACE-III。结果通过确定测试的各个子量表的最佳截止点进行统计分析。结果:MS患者各项认知功能水平均降低。ACE-III总分、记忆、Mini-ACE (M-ACE)和流畅性的差异有统计学意义(p < 0.005)。总分、记忆、M-ACE和流畅性的AUC值最高。截断水平为97点,灵敏度75%,特异度95%以上。在记忆和流畅性方面,该测试的特点是灵敏度接近60%,特异性超过90%。结论:ACE-III在评估MS认知功能障碍方面具有较高的诊断准确性、良好的敏感性和诊断特异性,关于MS患者在记忆和流畅性方面功能恶化的研究结果与文献结论相吻合,是表征MS患者认知功能障碍特征的一种尝试。
Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III) test as a new potential tool for screening of cognitive dysfunctions in the course of multiple sclerosis
Purpose: Cognitive dysfunction occurs in more than half of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The evaluation of the level of cognitive functioning in MS patients is important for the assessment of the disease course and deciding on appropriate therapeutic interventions. The purpose of the study was to analyse the suitability of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III) as a screening tool for detecting cognitive dysfunctions in MS. Methods: The study included 28 MS patients and 24 ageand gender-matched controls. The evaluation of cognitive functioning was conducted with ACE-III. The results were subjected to statistical analysis expanded by determining the optimal cut-off points for individual subscales of the test. Results: The level of all cognitive functions was lower in MS patients. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.005) were demonstrated for the results of the ACE-III total score, memory, Mini-ACE (M-ACE) and fluency. The highest AUC values were obtained for total score, memory, M-ACE and fluency. With the cut-off level of 97 points, the test was characterised by sensitivity of 75% and specificity of over 95%. In terms of memory and fluency, the test was characterised by sensitivity close to 60% and specificity over 90%. Conclusions: The ACE-III presents high diagnostic accuracy, good sensitivity and diagnostic specificity in the assessment of cognitive dysfunctions in MS. The results of the study concerning the deteriorated functioning of MS patients in terms of memory and fluency coincide with the conclusions from the literature and are an attempt to characterise the profile of cognitive dysfunctions in MS patients.
期刊介绍:
The quarterly Advances in Psychiatry and Neurology is aimed at psychiatrists, neurologists as well as scientists working in related areas of basic and clinical research, psychology, social sciences and humanities. The journal publishes original papers, review articles, case reports, and - at the initiative of the Editorial Board – reflections or experiences on currently vivid theoretical and practical questions or controversies. Articles submitted to the journal are evaluated first by the Section Editors, specialists in the fields of psychiatry, clinical psychology, science of the brain and mind and neurology, and reviewed by acknowledged authorities in the respective field. Authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other.