房颤卒中预防:药理学更新

W. Saeed, J. Kusick, M. R. Sardar, E. Gnall, S. Wajihuddin, J. Burke
{"title":"房颤卒中预防:药理学更新","authors":"W. Saeed, J. Kusick, M. R. Sardar, E. Gnall, S. Wajihuddin, J. Burke","doi":"10.3844/AMJSP.2013.143.149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For nearly half a century, the therapeutic options for the risk reduction of stroke in atrial fibrillation have been stagnant with vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin, being the primary therapy. Although antiplatelet agents have been investigated over this time, they were never shown to reduce the risk of stroke at the level warfarin has. Considering the limited therapeutic options, the main decision facing clinicians was not determining which agent to use, but whether a patient was at high enough risk of stroke to benefit from anticoagulation. The CHADS2 and, more recently, the CHADSVASC risk assessment schemes have been shown to be a simple and predicable tool in determining an individual's risk for stroke. Now, after nearly 50 years with limited alternatives, there has been a surge in therapies in the form of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban, which have been shown to be non-inferior and in some cases, superior to warfarin in their respective randomized controlled trials. This increase in available options is exciting but at the same time adds another layer of confusion to the process of selecting the appropriate agent for individual patients.","PeriodicalId":89887,"journal":{"name":"American medical journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"143-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3844/AMJSP.2013.143.149","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: Pharmacologic Update\",\"authors\":\"W. Saeed, J. Kusick, M. R. Sardar, E. Gnall, S. Wajihuddin, J. Burke\",\"doi\":\"10.3844/AMJSP.2013.143.149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For nearly half a century, the therapeutic options for the risk reduction of stroke in atrial fibrillation have been stagnant with vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin, being the primary therapy. Although antiplatelet agents have been investigated over this time, they were never shown to reduce the risk of stroke at the level warfarin has. Considering the limited therapeutic options, the main decision facing clinicians was not determining which agent to use, but whether a patient was at high enough risk of stroke to benefit from anticoagulation. The CHADS2 and, more recently, the CHADSVASC risk assessment schemes have been shown to be a simple and predicable tool in determining an individual's risk for stroke. Now, after nearly 50 years with limited alternatives, there has been a surge in therapies in the form of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban, which have been shown to be non-inferior and in some cases, superior to warfarin in their respective randomized controlled trials. This increase in available options is exciting but at the same time adds another layer of confusion to the process of selecting the appropriate agent for individual patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American medical journal\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"143-149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3844/AMJSP.2013.143.149\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3844/AMJSP.2013.143.149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3844/AMJSP.2013.143.149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

近半个世纪以来,降低房颤卒中风险的治疗选择一直停滞不前,维生素K拮抗剂,如华法林,是主要的治疗方法。虽然抗血小板药物在这段时间里已经被研究过,但它们从未显示出像华法林那样降低中风的风险。考虑到有限的治疗选择,临床医生面临的主要决定不是确定使用哪种药物,而是患者是否有足够高的卒中风险从抗凝治疗中获益。CHADS2和最近的CHADSVASC风险评估方案已被证明是确定个人中风风险的简单且可预测的工具。现在,经过近50年的有限替代方案,达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班等治疗形式出现了激增,在各自的随机对照试验中,这些治疗已被证明不低于华法林,在某些情况下甚至优于华法林。可选药物的增加令人兴奋,但同时也增加了为个别患者选择适当药物的过程中的另一层混乱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: Pharmacologic Update
For nearly half a century, the therapeutic options for the risk reduction of stroke in atrial fibrillation have been stagnant with vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin, being the primary therapy. Although antiplatelet agents have been investigated over this time, they were never shown to reduce the risk of stroke at the level warfarin has. Considering the limited therapeutic options, the main decision facing clinicians was not determining which agent to use, but whether a patient was at high enough risk of stroke to benefit from anticoagulation. The CHADS2 and, more recently, the CHADSVASC risk assessment schemes have been shown to be a simple and predicable tool in determining an individual's risk for stroke. Now, after nearly 50 years with limited alternatives, there has been a surge in therapies in the form of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban, which have been shown to be non-inferior and in some cases, superior to warfarin in their respective randomized controlled trials. This increase in available options is exciting but at the same time adds another layer of confusion to the process of selecting the appropriate agent for individual patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信