成人闭合性肱骨骨干骨折保守治疗的疗效

M. Muzahim
{"title":"成人闭合性肱骨骨干骨折保守治疗的疗效","authors":"M. Muzahim","doi":"10.3844/AMJSP.2011.32.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem statement: Fractures of the humeral shaft are commonly encountered by the \northopaedic surgeons; accounting for approximately 3% of all fractures. There is a wide array of good \noptions for their treatment and controversy over the best methods for many situations. Appropriate \nnonoperative and operative treatment of patients with humeral shaft fractures, however, requires an \nunderstanding of humeral anatomy, the fracture pattern and the patient’s activity level and expectations. Although good techniques of osteosynthesis are available, the aim of this article is to emphasize on the benefit and good outcome of conservative treatment for properly selected cases to decrease the cost and avoid the complications of surgery. Approach: During the period from Jan 2008 to Jun. 2009 seventy-eight fractures of humeral shaft were treated at Orthopaedic Department in the Tikrit Teaching hospital. 20 fractures considered suitable for the study. The patients treated conservatively by using the‘U’ shaped coaptation slab and the patients evaluated both clinically and radiologically every two weeks. If there is much pain or any degree of malalignment, we shift to POP cast. Then we follow the patient clinically and radiologically every 2-4 weeks and until the fracture had united and the limb functions were restored. The outcome of treatment was assessed by specific parameters which include alignment, rate of union and limb functions. Results: This study showed that the initial deformities of angulation were considerably reduced by the use of U slab and the POP cast which act as a dynamic rather than a static splint, correcting angulation to less than 30° in coronal plane and less than 20° in sagital plane. Manipulation of the fracture was not required and did affect neither the rate of union nor the final position, as the cast appeared to be capable of correcting angulation deformities. Perfect anatomical reduction was found not to be essential for satisfactory limb function, which was present with virus angulation and posterior bowing. The incidence of delayed union compares favorably with other reported series, although the definition of delayed union is variable. Conclusion: In fracture shaft of humerus, neither rigid immobilization nor perfect alignment are of great importance for final outcome, so conservative treatment is one of the most effective methods of treatment and the operative treatment can lead to adverse effect on the outcome in case of bad judgment and should be limited as much as possible to specific indications.","PeriodicalId":89887,"journal":{"name":"American medical journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"32-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3844/AMJSP.2011.32.39","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Outcome of Conservative Treatment of Closed Fracture Shaft Humerus in Adult Patients\",\"authors\":\"M. Muzahim\",\"doi\":\"10.3844/AMJSP.2011.32.39\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Problem statement: Fractures of the humeral shaft are commonly encountered by the \\northopaedic surgeons; accounting for approximately 3% of all fractures. There is a wide array of good \\noptions for their treatment and controversy over the best methods for many situations. Appropriate \\nnonoperative and operative treatment of patients with humeral shaft fractures, however, requires an \\nunderstanding of humeral anatomy, the fracture pattern and the patient’s activity level and expectations. Although good techniques of osteosynthesis are available, the aim of this article is to emphasize on the benefit and good outcome of conservative treatment for properly selected cases to decrease the cost and avoid the complications of surgery. Approach: During the period from Jan 2008 to Jun. 2009 seventy-eight fractures of humeral shaft were treated at Orthopaedic Department in the Tikrit Teaching hospital. 20 fractures considered suitable for the study. The patients treated conservatively by using the‘U’ shaped coaptation slab and the patients evaluated both clinically and radiologically every two weeks. If there is much pain or any degree of malalignment, we shift to POP cast. Then we follow the patient clinically and radiologically every 2-4 weeks and until the fracture had united and the limb functions were restored. The outcome of treatment was assessed by specific parameters which include alignment, rate of union and limb functions. Results: This study showed that the initial deformities of angulation were considerably reduced by the use of U slab and the POP cast which act as a dynamic rather than a static splint, correcting angulation to less than 30° in coronal plane and less than 20° in sagital plane. Manipulation of the fracture was not required and did affect neither the rate of union nor the final position, as the cast appeared to be capable of correcting angulation deformities. Perfect anatomical reduction was found not to be essential for satisfactory limb function, which was present with virus angulation and posterior bowing. The incidence of delayed union compares favorably with other reported series, although the definition of delayed union is variable. Conclusion: In fracture shaft of humerus, neither rigid immobilization nor perfect alignment are of great importance for final outcome, so conservative treatment is one of the most effective methods of treatment and the operative treatment can lead to adverse effect on the outcome in case of bad judgment and should be limited as much as possible to specific indications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American medical journal\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"32-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3844/AMJSP.2011.32.39\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3844/AMJSP.2011.32.39\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3844/AMJSP.2011.32.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

问题陈述:肱骨干骨折是骨科医生经常遇到的;约占所有骨折的3%。治疗这些疾病有很多好的选择,但在许多情况下,关于最佳方法的争议很大。然而,肱骨干骨折患者的适当非手术和手术治疗需要了解肱骨解剖、骨折类型以及患者的活动水平和期望。虽然良好的植骨技术是可用的,但本文的目的是强调对适当选择的病例进行保守治疗的益处和良好的结果,以降低成本并避免手术并发症。方法:2008年1月至2009年6月在提克里特教学医院骨科治疗肱骨干骨折78例。20处骨折被认为适合本研究。保守治疗采用“u”型贴合板,每两周进行一次临床和影像学检查。如果有很大的疼痛或任何程度的错位,我们转向POP石膏。然后我们每2-4周对患者进行临床和影像学随访,直到骨折愈合,肢体功能恢复。治疗结果通过具体参数评估,包括对齐、愈合率和肢体功能。结果:本研究表明,使用U板和POP铸型作为动态夹板而不是静态夹板,将成角矫正到冠状面小于30°,矢状面小于20°,大大减少了成角的初始畸形。不需要对骨折进行操作,也不影响愈合率和最终位置,因为石膏似乎能够纠正成角畸形。完美的解剖复位被发现不是必要的满意的肢体功能,这是存在的病毒角和后弓。虽然延迟愈合的定义是可变的,但与其他报道的系列相比,延迟愈合的发生率较好。结论:肱骨骨干骨折,无论是刚性固定还是完全对准对最终结局都不太重要,保守治疗是最有效的治疗方法之一,如果判断不良,手术治疗会对预后产生不良影响,应尽量局限于特定适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Outcome of Conservative Treatment of Closed Fracture Shaft Humerus in Adult Patients
Problem statement: Fractures of the humeral shaft are commonly encountered by the orthopaedic surgeons; accounting for approximately 3% of all fractures. There is a wide array of good options for their treatment and controversy over the best methods for many situations. Appropriate nonoperative and operative treatment of patients with humeral shaft fractures, however, requires an understanding of humeral anatomy, the fracture pattern and the patient’s activity level and expectations. Although good techniques of osteosynthesis are available, the aim of this article is to emphasize on the benefit and good outcome of conservative treatment for properly selected cases to decrease the cost and avoid the complications of surgery. Approach: During the period from Jan 2008 to Jun. 2009 seventy-eight fractures of humeral shaft were treated at Orthopaedic Department in the Tikrit Teaching hospital. 20 fractures considered suitable for the study. The patients treated conservatively by using the‘U’ shaped coaptation slab and the patients evaluated both clinically and radiologically every two weeks. If there is much pain or any degree of malalignment, we shift to POP cast. Then we follow the patient clinically and radiologically every 2-4 weeks and until the fracture had united and the limb functions were restored. The outcome of treatment was assessed by specific parameters which include alignment, rate of union and limb functions. Results: This study showed that the initial deformities of angulation were considerably reduced by the use of U slab and the POP cast which act as a dynamic rather than a static splint, correcting angulation to less than 30° in coronal plane and less than 20° in sagital plane. Manipulation of the fracture was not required and did affect neither the rate of union nor the final position, as the cast appeared to be capable of correcting angulation deformities. Perfect anatomical reduction was found not to be essential for satisfactory limb function, which was present with virus angulation and posterior bowing. The incidence of delayed union compares favorably with other reported series, although the definition of delayed union is variable. Conclusion: In fracture shaft of humerus, neither rigid immobilization nor perfect alignment are of great importance for final outcome, so conservative treatment is one of the most effective methods of treatment and the operative treatment can lead to adverse effect on the outcome in case of bad judgment and should be limited as much as possible to specific indications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信