学生对客户导向型与非客户导向型团队项目教学感知的多元分析

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Philip Appiah-Kubi
{"title":"学生对客户导向型与非客户导向型团队项目教学感知的多元分析","authors":"Philip Appiah-Kubi","doi":"10.3991/IJEP.V8I3.8498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The classroom experience has evolved from traditional lecture, PowerPoint and whiteboards to a more active environment where students and instructors work together more on hands-on activities to achieve the course objectives. Various names have been given to this pedagogy; experiential learning, project-based learning, active learning, problem-based learning are a handful of names used to describe this evolving pedagogy. The main challenge faced by educators in educating undergraduate students to be independent thinkers and problem solvers, has been the driving force fueling the shift in pedagogy. The skill sets needed to be successful in the workforce has also evolved over the years. Today’s employees are not only expected to demonstrate proficiency in green skills in their field of study, but must also possess soft skills required to be competitive in the industry. Gone are the days where engineers worked in silos applying their green skills to create for the common good. To be productive, employers expect today’s engineer to demonstrate the ability to work in teams, communicate effectively, while applying the technical and analytical know-how needed to achieve a desired goal. To ensure that undergraduate students have these desired skills, most engineering educators have shifted away from the traditional all lecture classes and are applying active learning pedagogies. This research looks into student’s perception on project-based learning with client based and non-client based projects in terms of: the project as a learning device, contribution to research knowledge, motivation to learn, contribution to skills and personal benefits, and their effects on student evaluation of teaching and motivation to learn.","PeriodicalId":45481,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multivariate Analysis of Students Perception on Teaching with Client Based and Non-Client Based Team Projects\",\"authors\":\"Philip Appiah-Kubi\",\"doi\":\"10.3991/IJEP.V8I3.8498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The classroom experience has evolved from traditional lecture, PowerPoint and whiteboards to a more active environment where students and instructors work together more on hands-on activities to achieve the course objectives. Various names have been given to this pedagogy; experiential learning, project-based learning, active learning, problem-based learning are a handful of names used to describe this evolving pedagogy. The main challenge faced by educators in educating undergraduate students to be independent thinkers and problem solvers, has been the driving force fueling the shift in pedagogy. The skill sets needed to be successful in the workforce has also evolved over the years. Today’s employees are not only expected to demonstrate proficiency in green skills in their field of study, but must also possess soft skills required to be competitive in the industry. Gone are the days where engineers worked in silos applying their green skills to create for the common good. To be productive, employers expect today’s engineer to demonstrate the ability to work in teams, communicate effectively, while applying the technical and analytical know-how needed to achieve a desired goal. To ensure that undergraduate students have these desired skills, most engineering educators have shifted away from the traditional all lecture classes and are applying active learning pedagogies. This research looks into student’s perception on project-based learning with client based and non-client based projects in terms of: the project as a learning device, contribution to research knowledge, motivation to learn, contribution to skills and personal benefits, and their effects on student evaluation of teaching and motivation to learn.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3991/IJEP.V8I3.8498\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3991/IJEP.V8I3.8498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

课堂体验已经从传统的讲座、ppt和白板演变为一个更加活跃的环境,学生和教师在实践活动中更多地合作,以实现课程目标。人们给这种教学法起了各种各样的名字;体验式学习、基于项目的学习、主动学习、基于问题的学习是用来描述这种不断发展的教学法的几个名称。教育工作者在培养大学生成为独立思考者和问题解决者方面面临的主要挑战,一直是推动教学法转变的动力。多年来,在劳动力市场取得成功所需的技能也在不断发展。今天的员工不仅要在自己的研究领域展示出熟练的绿色技能,还必须具备在行业中具有竞争力所需的软技能。工程师们在竖井里工作,运用他们的绿色技能为共同利益创造的日子已经一去不复返了。为了提高工作效率,雇主希望今天的工程师能够在团队合作、有效沟通的同时,运用所需的技术和分析知识来实现预期目标。为了确保本科生拥有这些所需的技能,大多数工程教育工作者已经从传统的全讲座课程转向采用主动学习教学法。本研究从项目作为一种学习工具、对研究知识的贡献、学习动机、对技能和个人利益的贡献,以及它们对学生评价教学和学习动机的影响等方面,探讨学生对基于客户和非客户的项目学习的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multivariate Analysis of Students Perception on Teaching with Client Based and Non-Client Based Team Projects
The classroom experience has evolved from traditional lecture, PowerPoint and whiteboards to a more active environment where students and instructors work together more on hands-on activities to achieve the course objectives. Various names have been given to this pedagogy; experiential learning, project-based learning, active learning, problem-based learning are a handful of names used to describe this evolving pedagogy. The main challenge faced by educators in educating undergraduate students to be independent thinkers and problem solvers, has been the driving force fueling the shift in pedagogy. The skill sets needed to be successful in the workforce has also evolved over the years. Today’s employees are not only expected to demonstrate proficiency in green skills in their field of study, but must also possess soft skills required to be competitive in the industry. Gone are the days where engineers worked in silos applying their green skills to create for the common good. To be productive, employers expect today’s engineer to demonstrate the ability to work in teams, communicate effectively, while applying the technical and analytical know-how needed to achieve a desired goal. To ensure that undergraduate students have these desired skills, most engineering educators have shifted away from the traditional all lecture classes and are applying active learning pedagogies. This research looks into student’s perception on project-based learning with client based and non-client based projects in terms of: the project as a learning device, contribution to research knowledge, motivation to learn, contribution to skills and personal benefits, and their effects on student evaluation of teaching and motivation to learn.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy
International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
35.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信