�?�?团队项目 ?胎盘介导妊娠并发症(PMC)的管理结果:血栓倾向试验和低分子肝素预防血栓对PMC复发的影响

A. Santamaría, E. Marti, C. Medina, A. M. Rodríguez, M. Stevenazzi, Y. Mira, Meritxell López, A. M. Redondo, R. Aguinaco, M. Sabater, A. Oliver
{"title":"�?�?团队项目<e:1> ?胎盘介导妊娠并发症(PMC)的管理结果:血栓倾向试验和低分子肝素预防血栓对PMC复发的影响","authors":"A. Santamaría, E. Marti, C. Medina, A. M. Rodríguez, M. Stevenazzi, Y. Mira, Meritxell López, A. M. Redondo, R. Aguinaco, M. Sabater, A. Oliver","doi":"10.37421/JBL.2019.9.241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: In placenta-mediated pregnancy complications, evidence-based guidelines are based on studies with controversial results or expert opinion. In this context, the implementation of those guidelines is quite different among physicians. Our aim was to analyze the management of PMC in a real-world scenario. Methods: From 2010 until 2016, we started the “TEAM Project” as a nested project within a working group of the Spanish Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SETH : Sociedad Espanola de Trombosis y Hemostasia). Results: We included 666 women with PMC, including recurrent pregnancy loss (50%), fetal death (25%), preeclampsia- eclampsia (20%), intrauterine growth restriction (5%) and placental abruption. Although a thrombophilia test was indicated in more than 80% of these patients, antiphospholipid antibodies were tested in less than 70% cases. The presence of PT20210A mutation and positive antiphospholipid antibodies were the most common findings observed. Among the 257 women with previous PMC who were assessed for thrombotic risk, 88.7% received antithrombotic prophylaxis, most frequently (46.8%) low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)+aspirin (AAS) and recurrence was observed in 14% of women. Conclusion: This is the first observational, multicentric and multidisciplinar phase IV study analyzing the real-life clinical management of PMC and other hemostatic/thrombotic events in women from Spain and Uruguay. Our results evidence a lack of homogeneity in the management of these complications as a result of the wide discordance among the existing guidelines, as well as a need for a call to action in fetal-maternal medicine.","PeriodicalId":90886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of blood & lymph","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"â�?�?The TEAM Projectâ�? Results on Management of Placenta-Mediated Pregnancy Complications (PMC): The Impact of Thrombophilia Test and Thromboprophylaxis with Low-Molecular-Weight-Heparin on Recurrences of PMC\",\"authors\":\"A. Santamaría, E. Marti, C. Medina, A. M. Rodríguez, M. Stevenazzi, Y. Mira, Meritxell López, A. M. Redondo, R. Aguinaco, M. Sabater, A. Oliver\",\"doi\":\"10.37421/JBL.2019.9.241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: In placenta-mediated pregnancy complications, evidence-based guidelines are based on studies with controversial results or expert opinion. In this context, the implementation of those guidelines is quite different among physicians. Our aim was to analyze the management of PMC in a real-world scenario. Methods: From 2010 until 2016, we started the “TEAM Project” as a nested project within a working group of the Spanish Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SETH : Sociedad Espanola de Trombosis y Hemostasia). Results: We included 666 women with PMC, including recurrent pregnancy loss (50%), fetal death (25%), preeclampsia- eclampsia (20%), intrauterine growth restriction (5%) and placental abruption. Although a thrombophilia test was indicated in more than 80% of these patients, antiphospholipid antibodies were tested in less than 70% cases. The presence of PT20210A mutation and positive antiphospholipid antibodies were the most common findings observed. Among the 257 women with previous PMC who were assessed for thrombotic risk, 88.7% received antithrombotic prophylaxis, most frequently (46.8%) low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)+aspirin (AAS) and recurrence was observed in 14% of women. Conclusion: This is the first observational, multicentric and multidisciplinar phase IV study analyzing the real-life clinical management of PMC and other hemostatic/thrombotic events in women from Spain and Uruguay. Our results evidence a lack of homogeneity in the management of these complications as a result of the wide discordance among the existing guidelines, as well as a need for a call to action in fetal-maternal medicine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of blood & lymph\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of blood & lymph\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37421/JBL.2019.9.241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of blood & lymph","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37421/JBL.2019.9.241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在胎盘介导的妊娠并发症中,循证指南是基于有争议的结果或专家意见的研究。在这种情况下,这些指导方针的实施在医生之间是完全不同的。我们的目的是分析现实场景中的PMC管理。方法:从2010年到2016年,我们在西班牙血栓和止血学会(SETH: Sociedad Espanola de Trombosis y止血学会)的一个工作组内启动了“TEAM项目”作为嵌套项目。结果:我们纳入了666名PMC患者,包括复发性妊娠丢失(50%)、胎儿死亡(25%)、先兆子痫-子痫(20%)、宫内生长受限(5%)和胎盘早剥。尽管超过80%的患者需要进行血栓形成试验,但在不到70%的病例中检测了抗磷脂抗体。PT20210A突变和抗磷脂抗体阳性是最常见的发现。在257名有PMC病史的妇女中,有形成血栓的危险,88.7%的妇女接受了抗血栓预防治疗,最常见的是(46.8%)低分子肝素(LMWH)+阿司匹林(AAS), 14%的妇女观察到复发。结论:这是第一个观察性、多中心、多学科的IV期研究,分析了西班牙和乌拉圭女性PMC和其他止血/血栓事件的现实临床管理。我们的研究结果表明,由于现有指南之间的广泛不一致,这些并发症的管理缺乏同质性,也需要呼吁在胎母医学中采取行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
â�?�?The TEAM Projectâ�? Results on Management of Placenta-Mediated Pregnancy Complications (PMC): The Impact of Thrombophilia Test and Thromboprophylaxis with Low-Molecular-Weight-Heparin on Recurrences of PMC
Aim: In placenta-mediated pregnancy complications, evidence-based guidelines are based on studies with controversial results or expert opinion. In this context, the implementation of those guidelines is quite different among physicians. Our aim was to analyze the management of PMC in a real-world scenario. Methods: From 2010 until 2016, we started the “TEAM Project” as a nested project within a working group of the Spanish Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SETH : Sociedad Espanola de Trombosis y Hemostasia). Results: We included 666 women with PMC, including recurrent pregnancy loss (50%), fetal death (25%), preeclampsia- eclampsia (20%), intrauterine growth restriction (5%) and placental abruption. Although a thrombophilia test was indicated in more than 80% of these patients, antiphospholipid antibodies were tested in less than 70% cases. The presence of PT20210A mutation and positive antiphospholipid antibodies were the most common findings observed. Among the 257 women with previous PMC who were assessed for thrombotic risk, 88.7% received antithrombotic prophylaxis, most frequently (46.8%) low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)+aspirin (AAS) and recurrence was observed in 14% of women. Conclusion: This is the first observational, multicentric and multidisciplinar phase IV study analyzing the real-life clinical management of PMC and other hemostatic/thrombotic events in women from Spain and Uruguay. Our results evidence a lack of homogeneity in the management of these complications as a result of the wide discordance among the existing guidelines, as well as a need for a call to action in fetal-maternal medicine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信